All user reviews for the Pioneer CDJ-100S

I used these two turntables Foit Salamanca (Spain, for conaisseur junk) and I am extremely due ...
I had a lot of beugues as auto cue does not work or the cd that jumps. The absence of a loop is more than remarkable to get to do something drinking there must be at least 30 seconds of intro to each song. In my ca I had to go to comercial impeut therefore take on such Bob Sinclar-rock this party, barely 10 seconds of INTROP, not possible to chain.
the jog is compltement imprci and the pitch!
I can be at Pioneer CDJ1000 impeut abituer traditional club but I deprecated the hardware especially beginners who will nitre time impresionant stalling until you know! plutt not start on platinum vinyl CHRE is more his style is Aprende a stall has the ear without bpm counter and other dj console.

- How long have you use it?
Used for 3 or 4 years of fairly intensive ...
- What is so special that you like most and least?
I like the simplicity of the concept, while in pioneer seems logical enough ... I did not find any particular fault, except perhaps the ZIP effect a little cheap but it's still pretty subjective ... Among the spots can also hold the plastic finish that can put off some (I eagerly await the release of solid oak with the jog set with diamonds and 24k gold buttons ...). Provided this toy is strong enough (at least it will not rust!)
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
It was my first platinum cd, since I switched from Denon and Pioneer plans to return home ...
- How would you rate the quality / price?
Now I find it a bit excessive compared to other models that have a little more advanced functions (loops) ...
- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
I hesitate to just take me a pair used to couple them with a mix of computer, I find it more flexible than working on a dedicated control surface ...

I want to add my total disagreement with the previous opinion: the man probably had no luck with his stuff on my own self-cue cd's worked and never jumped, but then absolutely ever! I add here that this board, if it does not read cd-mp3, cd-bed perfectly properly engraved r ... So of course it does not loop, which is rather unfortunate today, but everything else is so very correct, the pitch is clear and the jog is very flexible ... In the end it is very reliable hardware and really enjoyable to use. I advise to start of course, but also to go further into the mix, for those who do not particularly need a plate that rotates or scratch ...

Used for quite some time with a DJM 600, I used a lot of other models from other brand and product lines.
Cheap Used they can establish a board-level pro (fontionne capable of long and reliable). The qualities of reading Pioneer are above the average for other brands even for CDJ 100.
Very good understanding and usability of commands in a mix of basic pitch, fast loading CD, ACCURATE and so instinctive. Good big square buttons that do not loupent (not like the CDJ 200 or 800par example). Extremely solid and reliable, a real tank. Do not fear (or less than others) to work outdoors in conditions dificiles. Works well and benefits from BPM starts with some missing Mix Piopio. They will, for example the plates of the beginner, amateur or discomobile bug who wants to work without jumping or hard after three nights (it's not Ge ... or Nu .... etc.).
The least? We will not blame him she did not ... (BPM, MP3, effects) It's obvious that he prefers a 200 if you do not mix that has a BPM or if you want to play MP3
Value unbeatable bargain price, but testing with a bad CD and the starts. In nine, it is true that with such a small price difference it is better to take CDJ 200.
I have and I keep them and there are better but more expensive ...

Aging product but very nice and reliable, do not literally the opinion which is much lower Completely false (pseudo dj who mix in Spain Bob Sinclar (squeaker squeaker) you entered star ac 'and get the pom pom, it's not glorious brief opinion) ...
Me and unlike what is often said, I think the cdj 100s are not bad for Plutt mixer at the tempo even very good, much more specific on that availing oneself cdj 200 than I so I can talk about any negatives Manir reviews on this product comes mostly apprentices already in short, they do not know everything btement mix and buying a Pioneer they think will do everything ... any one fawn a true artist who calls himself DJ starts by learning to mix on vinyl end point!, the real essence of art & mix learned about the 1200 MK2 (vinyl) because I specific on certain n are again at odds with this format ..
In rsum and in view of his age the cdj 100 is robust, reliable, hassle free binds all brands of cd's market is relatively specific on the timing with the beat, oblivion cdj 200 ( jog too imprcis) on the other hand is ideal for uses cut, fade, etc., when the pseudo DJ rvise your apprciations on this kind of product that I think is Completely bidone and filled with lies ..

* For how long have you been using it?
10 months

* Did you try many other models before getting this one?
this is my first decks, I just tried the cdj 400 ...

* What thing do you like most/least about it?
most, the three effects pioneer, aesthetics (not needed), the absence of BPM counter (to learn it better to my taste), and its still a bargain price!

the less the price New ... CUE not very easy to use at the beginning ...

* What is your opinion about the value for the price?
good when it is excessive enough to ACCase and when it is new ...

* Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice?
I think these turntables have given me the taste of the mix (even if I am only my debut) ... Now I will move the biggest I think cdj 800, cdj 1OOS are good mouthing to learn and not to invest in a loss of monsters ... 300 euro bought the pair I am very satisfied ...

For how long have you been using it?

I use it for 1 month or so

Did you try many other models before getting this one?

-Yes: CDJ1000MK3, cdj200, cdj800mk2, cdj350, cdj2000, numark stanton C314 and axis9

What thing do you like most/least about it?

-With respect to the plate and everything and good price! except maybe the lack of loop

What is your opinion about the value for the price?

-Unbeatable for 60 euro! quality is the same in the low-end Pioneer!

Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice? ...

"Yes and no, yes-because of these very good turntable-but not because that after a time must evolve, here I am on a cdj 2000 ....

-For how long have you been using it?

Since ... this morning! Yep, replacement project AXIS 9 CR ...

Did you try many other models before getting this one?

Axis 9, Yeah, cdj 800-1000 ... But long ago ...

What thing do you like most/least about it?

Simple! It is certainly frugal, but we are not disappointed by what is
She has the mouth! It will easily make
Even if I find that this effect is not a big thing on the plate, it always helps for those that have not (I would have preferred a loop ^ ^)

Less:

It's simple, exactly! A bit too! I indeed liked at least one loop, but hey, it must be said that even party catalog now ...
What is your opinion about the value for the price? Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice? ...

Exellent value for money! It's reliable! The platinum price has to start down par excellence! I would not even take the axis 9, which are stews of a beautiful side!

In short, yes I would do, since I'm going directly to a second, and obviously, if I had more money, I would go directly to 850, or the DN-S 3700, but it's different.

(Originally written by laulaulastar/translated from Audiofanzine FR)
- I used this player for several events.

- Pros: effects, pitch, CD tray and CD loading system

Cons: Obsolete cue point system, somewhat old...

- I've mixed with a CDJ200, a CDJ800 and a DNS1000. There is simply no comparison with this one.

- This player is obsolete and very expensive. You'll find better players or the same price (however the quality of this one is pretty high!).

- I wouldn't buy it again because it's too old. I recommend you the CDJ200.