Published on 05/06/06 at 06:52
See Korg.com
UTILIZATION
This is the highlight of this machine: ergonomics. The edition of the sounds is very simple via the touch screen, and I do my presets scne in the blink of an eye. The manual is clear when you need. Note that I use basically the program mode, combi, rarely the sequencer and sampler ever.
SOUNDS
So is the more complicated: The sounds of Manir gnrale trs are good. The organs (the fire cx-3) are well-trs, trs good electric pianos. The acoustic pianos, blah, but it's not new to Korg.
The highlight: tablecloths, organs, synthetic sounds, and some trs good brass sounds, which once reworked trs going well in the mix.
My biggest complaint concerns the bass sounds: not enough ralistes too synthetic at all, lack of roundness (acoustic as electric).
Otherwise the lamp amne a real plus.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it on intensment scne for 8 months. I am generally happy. If the pattern are silent as ergonomic as the Triton, I would change right away!
I'm in a band as a trio www.goodvibeslesite.com (http://www.goodvibeslesite.com) o I low. As the directory is trs East 70's 80's, needless to say that the bass is super important, and I'm from. But I do all my presets, so I do not (yet) have the courage to move on the ground are.
However, for typical synthetic sounds (lead, brass, pad) I am happy with the korg trs. Ergonomics is gniale.
A dtail important instrument sounds trs good "noyquot; in the mix. It is - to say, ideal for scne. BUT ... we are all three at the ear -monitor, and the sound is largely DEFINITIONS suprieur a poor Wadge. However, this fawn all default to happen in a mix of traditional front and back become obvious.
If I had to change, I would take the ground, but I would lose in the organ.
What I like most: usability and its relationship qualitprix unbeatable. The least you understood: the electric bass sounds.
Note that I do not use any of the sounds of piano and rhodes, for my newt has over a rd700sx with SRX-12.
A +
UTILIZATION
This is the highlight of this machine: ergonomics. The edition of the sounds is very simple via the touch screen, and I do my presets scne in the blink of an eye. The manual is clear when you need. Note that I use basically the program mode, combi, rarely the sequencer and sampler ever.
SOUNDS
So is the more complicated: The sounds of Manir gnrale trs are good. The organs (the fire cx-3) are well-trs, trs good electric pianos. The acoustic pianos, blah, but it's not new to Korg.
The highlight: tablecloths, organs, synthetic sounds, and some trs good brass sounds, which once reworked trs going well in the mix.
My biggest complaint concerns the bass sounds: not enough ralistes too synthetic at all, lack of roundness (acoustic as electric).
Otherwise the lamp amne a real plus.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it on intensment scne for 8 months. I am generally happy. If the pattern are silent as ergonomic as the Triton, I would change right away!
I'm in a band as a trio www.goodvibeslesite.com (http://www.goodvibeslesite.com) o I low. As the directory is trs East 70's 80's, needless to say that the bass is super important, and I'm from. But I do all my presets, so I do not (yet) have the courage to move on the ground are.
However, for typical synthetic sounds (lead, brass, pad) I am happy with the korg trs. Ergonomics is gniale.
A dtail important instrument sounds trs good "noyquot; in the mix. It is - to say, ideal for scne. BUT ... we are all three at the ear -monitor, and the sound is largely DEFINITIONS suprieur a poor Wadge. However, this fawn all default to happen in a mix of traditional front and back become obvious.
If I had to change, I would take the ground, but I would lose in the organ.
What I like most: usability and its relationship qualitprix unbeatable. The least you understood: the electric bass sounds.
Note that I do not use any of the sounds of piano and rhodes, for my newt has over a rd700sx with SRX-12.
A +