Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Marshall MG412A
Images
1/91

All user reviews for the Marshall MG412A

4x12 Guitar Cabinet from Marshall belonging to the MG series

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
4.2/5
(7 reviews)
43 %
(3 reviews)
29 %
(2 reviews)
14 %
(1 review)
Write a user review
Users reviews
  • wizzywizzy

    Marshall MG412APublished on 06/23/07 at 06:57
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I would like to know whether this branch marshall cabinet can be anything other than a head -it is possible to connect a combo amp eg a marshall amp MG100DFX? thank you
  • King LoudnessKing Loudness

    Blehh....

    Marshall MG412APublished on 01/25/12 at 09:02
    The Marshall MG412A is the company's cheapest level cab and is meant to go with their solid state MG100 head, or act as a 4x12 rig for those who can't afford a 4x12 of a higher calibre. It's actually slightly smaller than the conventional 1960 cab which has its pluses and minuses. The lighter weight means that's definitely a little easier to cart around than a regular model and it doesn't cause as much strain on the back. However, it also sounds thinner and cheaper because of this. The tones are certainly lacking in low end heft as well as punchiness, especially at higher volumes. In a band mix the cab doesn't really offer the solid backbone to stand up in a mix. Using high volume tube rigs…
    Read more
    The Marshall MG412A is the company's cheapest level cab and is meant to go with their solid state MG100 head, or act as a 4x12 rig for those who can't afford a 4x12 of a higher calibre. It's actually slightly smaller than the conventional 1960 cab which has its pluses and minuses. The lighter weight means that's definitely a little easier to cart around than a regular model and it doesn't cause as much strain on the back. However, it also sounds thinner and cheaper because of this. The tones are certainly lacking in low end heft as well as punchiness, especially at higher volumes. In a band mix the cab doesn't really offer the solid backbone to stand up in a mix. Using high volume tube rigs the sound tends to get buried in a mix, especially when other guitarists are in the mix. It's loaded with cheap Celestion branded speakers that are built for this model. They aren't the same quality as a Vintage 30 or Greenback though, they are pretty flat and bland sounding without much top end sizzle or punch in the midrange. However the cheap construction is a bigger fault here, because you're left with a very thin and cheaply made enclosure that will always sound inherently thin regardless of speaker choice. It's really not a surprise given the cheaper price of this cab, but then again I've had cheaper cabs from other companies that did sound thicker than this. Your milage may vary though. For just a beater cab to use for lower volume applications it sounds okay, but it really doesn't hold up very well at higher volumes. Players might be enticed by the fact that it's a cheap cab emblazoned with the Marshall name, but if you need a decent cab for gigging applications I would look elsewhere.
    See less
  • MalparesMalpares

    Marshall MG412APublished on 12/16/06 at 01:42
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Well then, here's about a little over one month that I use.
    The sound quality is the appointment even if it is not the top of the cab. The sound is very well distributed and of good quality. This cabinet has 4 Celestion (it should be entry level but still it's good!)
    I have not tried other models, since I bought a MG100HDFX logically and I took his cabinet! But I have used other models and I can tell you that this cab is really good!
    I just contradict the previous opinion regarding the coating fragile: I carried in my car this cab to my home where I make them repeat a dozen times and I have not had a single pets ! I find it really solid! + Well now I need to transport saw that I was r…
    Read more
    Well then, here's about a little over one month that I use.
    The sound quality is the appointment even if it is not the top of the cab. The sound is very well distributed and of good quality. This cabinet has 4 Celestion (it should be entry level but still it's good!)
    I have not tried other models, since I bought a MG100HDFX logically and I took his cabinet! But I have used other models and I can tell you that this cab is really good!
    I just contradict the previous opinion regarding the coating fragile: I carried in my car this cab to my home where I make them repeat a dozen times and I have not had a single pets ! I find it really solid! + Well now I need to transport saw that I was ready for a JCM800 1960 TV repeats.
    For the price, the quality is really there! One critic Marshall lot, but I think Marshall is still good quality!
    I would do that choice again! Do the same!
    I put 9 / 10 because nothing is perfect (I note in relation to price and quality!)
    See less
  • SuperAxiomManSuperAxiomMan

    Marshall MG412APublished on 12/13/06 at 05:06
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I have a little over a year and a cab that price is acceptable frankly trs.
    its level, it comes out pretty well: the cab features four Celestion, low-end of course .. but even when Celestion.
    In addition it is still light enough (only possible transport on short distances ... well, at least)
    By the coating against him looks a little more dlicat ... I had a lot on one side but the worst is that I see how (he has 2 trip once in a lifetime). So apparently it takes is a little hitch that is dteriore ca.
    I'm sorry for against, even if it is light, there ale no wheels.

    I put a 8 / 10 for that price you can afford a good dja small amplification scne.
  • blitzkrieg-alexblitzkrieg-alex

    Marshall MG412APublished on 02/22/08 at 15:30
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I use this cabinet for four months, I used to in two concerts, it is very lightweight and still powerful, it is resistant, scratch-auncune but the sound is not worth a premium of course.
    I recommend it for those who want to start playing in two bodies but ceuxqui already have one, look elsewhere.
    Value for money not too bad, I would do bie nce choice
  • SlapKidSlapKid

    Good box that compresses well

    Marshall MG412APublished on 04/02/11 at 01:50
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I've had 2-3 years, vintage beige version (cosmetics limited edition).
    Very very nice, the smallest possible for hp it contains, rather light 24 kg approx.
    I mainly used my fender bassman up its internal hp (hp of the mg are 8 ohms so it was rewired in parallel the 2 ohm required by bassman)
    In this config the sound was just great, warm-accurate low-round and all with very little additional compression vintage but without drooling a bit. The bassman is set to max its clear sound (if it rings not in fact, typical tubes ...).
    That's actually clean, state of origin.
    Currently I put eminence alnico (see my review) in and it's super hot, killer with a different amp (Crate PowerBlock and dis…
    Read more
    I've had 2-3 years, vintage beige version (cosmetics limited edition).
    Very very nice, the smallest possible for hp it contains, rather light 24 kg approx.
    I mainly used my fender bassman up its internal hp (hp of the mg are 8 ohms so it was rewired in parallel the 2 ohm required by bassman)
    In this config the sound was just great, warm-accurate low-round and all with very little additional compression vintage but without drooling a bit. The bassman is set to max its clear sound (if it rings not in fact, typical tubes ...).
    That's actually clean, state of origin.
    Currently I put eminence alnico (see my review) in and it's super hot, killer with a different amp (Crate PowerBlock and distortion pedals), always with that little box a big compression n'offirira never acceptable volume ...
    In short unless you want to marry a 100w head lamps to catch a good choice. The 1960 g12t75 I know, and it is the worst box market in my opinion ...
    That, for the 279 roros disbursed the result was unexpected!.
    See less
  • patvmaxpatvmax

    quality in return!

    Marshall MG412APublished on 03/30/11 at 15:42
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    While this is not the 1960A, but his younger brother ... same look, same type of hp, except that instead of cash 120w 200.c is its great advantage, because you can even hook up a combo has 40W lamps, and the sound is processed. (I did it with a Peavey Classic 30 and a Fender Blues Deluxe.) Hello sound reproduction of this beast. ..... moreover, it is very robust, and not need a roadie to put it in his car trunk. and on stage, like a "pro". yeah, it's still the same reference mark! it is a bit lighter than the 1960a, and a little lower. (67 instead of 77cm) but the sound is comparable. I also have a 1960a that I keep for fun (and memories of the scene).