Behringer Ultracoustic ACX1800

Amp ultrasonics Berhinger ACX1800.

180 watt is saying, but to the ear, not even 60

UTILIZATION

36000 EFFECTS OF THIS OR THAT, with frequency at all costs. Be more of a physicist than a musician. However, not a single button BASS, MIDDLE, TREBLE, finally, the base.
Its crap, a feast for the eyes but not for the ears, use it only to decorate the background of a scene.

SOUNDS

No sound is adjustable, just dozens and dozens of different flanger.

OVERALL OPINION

Nothing more to say, it is unnecessary to go into details because there is no positive to attach him, except for fans of dozens of small buttons, I'm sure he uses less the NASA.

in theory sounds good, despite a somewhat cheap plastic of some buttons

UTILIZATION

the amp is easy to use. I tried it in a music store, and the grip is easy. I wanted an acoustic amp made by focusing on voice because I'm a singer before guitarist.
This amp is resulted due to liquidation of the store, I tried it with a lot of hope ...

SOUNDS

I tweaked the settings a guitarist with a friend to try to get correct rendering both the guitar for voice. There was no way to have a beautiful sound. I wanted to replace a powered speaker that I currently use with pedal effects and amp simulator lamp ... sound obtained with the Behringer was much worse and I did not want to change the given system.
The sound is cold, metallic, and gives the impression of having a permanent wave effect "phone" on the guitar. For singing, equally disappointing.

OVERALL OPINION

this test store was enough, I did not buy this amp ... About the advertised power, 180 w, I'm surprised, because we turned the knobs at 3/4 and yet the sound was not that strong ... difficult to rely on this amp for a small scene. Bad value for money in my opinion ... as finding a good occaze another model for the same budget.

Electro-acoustic amplifier 180 w. many effects. an anti feedbach. compressors etc.
for more info, to merchant sites rfrer

UTILIZATION

The use is very simple. The manual is not ncessaire

SOUNDS

I pass the electro-acoustics to amplify and improve my voice.
I sing and accompany children with my guitar for a fifteen years. I am therefore of the popular song Franaise and English.
A marshal's amiem'a prt as50r with whom I amused myself for a month APRS have amplified my classical guitar cuenca 45
I wish qq bought something a little more powerful (on paper) and I ordered online (with return if not satisfied) this amp behringer without trying.
When I turned it on I heard a hollow sound, accompanied by a mtallique rsonnance dsagrable. in 5 minutes I had tried all rglages effects and possible, without getting anything to correct.
I pushed my song and I dyed the BTE, the hyper.
A cot that, the marshall that I found nice no more, until you have tried the behringer, I feel really great now. In comparison, the sound is warm, full.
It gives relement want to sing.
I also found by testing that the 180 watts
the behringer is not more effective than the 50 watt marshall amp larsennent since both at the same level of power. Manufacturers talk about power as he would return. Power means nothing if the return is zero.

OVERALL OPINION

By the time the service comes back looking for the behringer (more than a week), he's running 2 hours maximum (and because I had made my friend's amp).
I cut all want to sing.
Since I bought an old Marshall AS 50 R for 165 euros. reverb and chorus being hs, I added a home picoverb alesis 75 euros (excellent) and a case behringer phantom power 23 euros (trs works well)
head with a micro-hc95 t-bone 49 euros (condenser microphone) and a small hand apx6 yamha 175 euros, it's nothing but happiness for about 500 euros. The report qualitprix is ​​stunning.
To end the Berhinger, I would say that this instrument on paper seems INTERESTED trs. There are plenty of small Lumire that light. trs is beautiful. but all these and many frioritures effects only serve to look pretty. Basically, the sound is ugly and metal and 50 000 rglages not change anything. The compressor, anti feedback, it all seems also gadget ..
Voila, a test is INTERESTED when you have a point of comparison. So I cit the marshall found everywhere and very easy on occasion, but there are also Carlsbro trs that work well for not too expensive
I wanted to give this notice because I have been waiting for someone talks about the acx and this purchase has made me lose time.
If like me you live in the countryside, it's not always easy to go try a little hardware store REPRESENTATIVES.
I also left a little notice on the form of marshall.

2x 90 W RMS
it is true that some 50 w are equivalent
but even when he spits hard and well and breathless

UTILIZATION

Using very simple
no need for manual
no brainer

SOUNDS

More than correct on while singing
The effects are pretty good
for the price it's all good

OVERALL OPINION

The acx 1800 was exellent value for money
I am faithful to behringer and I find their material and very reliable
It is true that I m'attandais a little more power
but anyway, and spits ca ca remains clear and breathless
plusque effects are okay and the song exellent
For my part I am very happy and I recommend it for very low price and Polivalente
rivals without problem some brand amp (the same price)