All user reviews for the Samson Technologies Resolv 65a

I use a Yamaha console MG16/6FX mainly pourdes electro sounds. Premire impression: it's great playing with my net headphones or amplified speakers logitech has changed me dramatically.

SOUNDS

All sounds are well Perus. The bass is good it's better if you add a box of course. The treble is clear and well-slap. The possibility of rgler "MID Presence" -3 / +6 dB.
Basically a change in depth especially acute. BMOL level frquences MID / HIGH. Not much changes when I triturated knob of the yam.

OVERALL OPINION

This is the very first time I use the monitor, but it is necessary despite what I thought to be prcis in these compounds. For use in Electro / techno is what I need, not need more. In addition to the power of these small bx is quite impressive, there's good moy dcoll on his own compositions. For use with more traditional acoustic instruments I do not know because they are a little lgre medium level but good for electronic music was so good.
Good speakers overall.

J did the aqusition of reolv 65a has 2 months now as part of a regular utimlisation computer music to techno. What motivated my choice, it is the price (400 € a pair of expo-model)! and dimensions that make it a discreet speaker which fits easily in the studio. however, careful to position equidistant from the head for a good record of the stereo)
As for the features, k is seen on the website of the brand. www.samsontech.com (active speaker 75w 25 w-what is more than enough for a studio of 15m ². you can even say that this tape. The amplification quality is perfectly suited to the product. electromaniétique shielded, titanium tweeter. Hp 6.5-inch event of decompression on the front so no problem with the wall (AC as it is seen for small studios) connectivity varied (c nice for the price!) I'm sorry just a digital input but good is all this luxury ...
As against this, or they screwed up is the positioning information from the Food and Mid control buttons. They would also have better protect the front of the speaker ... gaffe to blow the tweeter in the manip-unpacking and yes .... g shit but the sound was not altéré.ouff
Basically a good job and finish more than adequate for the price of these speakers.

SOUNDS

Not being expert in the field so I will leave the analysis of more competent people.
My impression all the same, it sounds good! neutral if I do not know but the sound is clear, precise even the bass is present (not as much as can be on-alesis mkII) and for those who criticize --- Zave ka learn to adjust your sound - because in my case the result is there (and since that is on the techno I work you can imagine that I expect a report.)
For those who think the subwoofer as a complement, it's just for the comfort of listening-it's more for use as stereo mix itself ...
Finally, these speakers do not tire of listening to long and can afford to work many hours without saturating.
Even at low volume rendering is good light dynamics. c nice when the little Hugo (that my friend's baby) is asleep at the top.
A good thing too, the knob of mediums, seems they can get closer to the sound of the legendary NS10!! a check ...
c of the good stuff especially for the price. of course there are more precise and better on the market but much more !!!!!!

OVERALL OPINION

After hesitating between Edyrols MA20D, the Alesis mkII active, I turned to resolv 65a (thank you the promo) and I have no regrets. Prepare to find before long the big techno balls to Jeff Mills, Ben Sims or Adam Beyer in the tanks, but with the French touch!!
and +:
sound, the price, the knob of mediums, dimensions
the -:
the power supply and the buttons on the rear, not to protect the front .....
Ah! j also were going to forget: the speakers are not ventilated and heat a bit much. I do not know if this has influence on the sound or longevity of the speakers but it noted. (By the way if anyone can give me information on this subject ....)
Conclusion: I would do without a doubt and with the same budget that choice. Excellent value for money! remains to be seen if the SAV of the brand is serious, and if the speakers pass the ultimate test "LONGEVITY!"
A GOOD CHOICE FOR THE computer music and also I think to use HI-FI (with subwoofer brand ca should give even better).
Special dedication to The Dark. succession of French dj / techno composers ... Finally j hopes!! lol

The technical features that have motivated my choice:
- Their size really ideal for a room of 13 square meters
- A good listener even at low volume
- The bass port at the front (which allows me to leave them almost against the wall)
- The ability to easily adjust the midrange positions via 3
- The super connectivity complete (XLR, Jack, RCA / Sinch)
- The excellent build quality for the price!
- The power which shoed alluciner more than one
- They all intersect only when there is no signal
- The diodes ... blue (well there's not super important)

What I like least in the long run:
- The screen is not enough and despite a difference of more than 80 cm tour of my Pc and my monitors, speakers recover parasites (it really is a big minus)
- There is no cooling fins to the back (as on tapcos) and it's really hot! Well it is nothing serious in the winter but I will morfler this summer!
- The color of the decor is super kitsch! they look like toys (though weight, quality plastic and assembly reassured very quickly)
- And the power settings are at the back but the buttons are big enough and well placed (not need a screwdriver) so that you get to make his adjustments quickly.
- Missing a control input for peak saturation, the coup is sought over the entire audio chain

SOUNDS

Well here we feel that the engineers have really dug the head and there are zicos with them! the sound to finally determine the criterion of choice despite some small rédibitoires least not at all. I could compare them with the Truth by Beringer, the Fostex PM05, the M-Audio (BX5 and 8), Krk V6, Makiese (600 and few) the yam MSP5, the alesis mk2, the Roland D- 30, I still called the edirol and EgoSys but it really is not level.

Well those are really above the krk (really amazing) and Mackie (especially on the definition of acute and low mids).

As I did not like the personal thruth (but that defended well though), the Roland and the yams (which really miss too many serious despite their super definition of mediums).

I really love m-audio (particularly 8 but more expensive) and fostex but the price differences were justified by no means (see the contrary with respect to characteristics such as setting the mediums of 65a or events of low in front).

so the + and -:
- Neutral curve with a slight bump in the lower medium that is corrected quickly.

- Excellent stereo although still too high directionality of the sound. should really be located in relation to the speakers (the tweeters at ear equidistant). Well that's only when have pre-master mix huh!

- Precision is really great to be on the low share of high acute when one feels that it mixes faster than on krk example but it does not hurt in any case not the final mix

- A dynamic that it's hard to find fault: you can push them cashing the jades! I wonder as they do elsewhere, the mix of frequencies is the same as low-volume high-volume, I think this is something super important to mix at 3 am low volume with the baby sleep in the next room and re-listen to the next without having to make corrections to ... yes and no tiring for a sub, you can mix it with a happy hour

- The sound is very clear and precise, careful there is no infrabass it will mix with headphones or a subwoofer (which is optional). But they are really low and there is a pleasure to hear them, their sound is clear and it blows it right (well it blows hot air but it's nice to wet hair in the morning .

OVERALL OPINION

I use them for 8 months, it was really hard in the beginning because we feel that our sound mixes well, and so that the speakers are nazes ... but those are the mixes that are bad!

It took me 3 to 4 months still to learn, time to understand that we should not necessarily cut all the treble hiss but when they equalize the sound fishing ...

they finally do their job but it's hard to be with so many corrections to make: you end up with all the defects of the samples, taken votes, all queues reverb rework.

It was especially hard on older songs that sound at once so badly that the new material made from the start it is much easier to mix (for example, I did "Blazz" on multimedia speaker and "face" since start with the resolver).

well it's true, whenever I can I go to Dynaudio or krk but frankly the price difference does not really justify the use I make of my components and are not yet to deserve better.

Therefore recommend great buy! especially on the quality / price ratio! after each of his ears and his music ...

The technical specifications that have motivated my choice:

Not to take anything that has t said before, I would say that Resolv65a are indeed remarkable in every sense of the word. (Finishing, Aesthetics, and connectors rglages, sales of low front)
The price is reasonable trs screws from the competition and at the same quality sound
The arrangement of my monitors is such that I had no parasites at ESG, I have closer to my screen (Iiyama) less than 20 cm and no worries or no monitors at the level the same notch it. In my opinion the screen is more than enough and I also think that some notches may be better conus.
It is true that a slightly warm (not more than other active monitors for that matter) but hey!
The rear face is not too bad, I'd even done well, leaving some originality this product. (Well I will not m'terniser )

SOUNDS

Well for the record, having worked with several major brand or even have the cost and test (Alesis, Yamaha NS10, the Fostex PM-1, M-Audio BX8, Beringer TRUTH B2031, of krk V6, V8, Mackie HR824, Yamaha MPS5, GENELEC 1030A - The NS10, 1030A, and HR824 V6, V8 Studio Pro) I would say that RESOLV 65a tonn me by the quality of sound and their power.
In compare with friends mixes made with in the studio with NS10 and then with RESOLV 65a we concluded that the only matres board are our ears, and we gots our style. The mix taient all as thundering as each other. Like every human being is unique we do not perceive things the same fawn at the same instant (in fact fortunately!)

- The curve is neutral frequency drives and corrected in case.

- Stereo image is excellent. Once the speakers well placed, the precision is remarkable.

- The sound is clear trs, although prcis across the spectrum, low trs trs agree well despite what some say on the forums. The bass may even be trs heavy, with excellent precision (again, make your own expriences) now, depending on what you want to mix or take a box. The acute excelled net clean and shine well.

- The dynamic is amazing and well respected. Surprising even when the template for the speakers. They will surprise you, test them and you tell me the news. For pregnant Proxim nothing better. They respect the quality of your mixes high and low volume. No draping observation.
Perfection n'tant not of this world, it is well worth 9 / 10 10/10 but I vote to give a boost that will make these monitors and mritent proven to have a place in the world Audio Pro.

OVERALL OPINION

Use for 10 months.

Say anything except that "pay what is Samson Samson." They are Gniales. I have friends who make their mix of big names and found them all as gniales. (It should be tamed his gear)
Again, make your choice based on your ideas of music, your style, your feelings, your exprience forcment for some and not with everyone else.
In my opinion the best tools will not forcment the best sounds when the musician is dpourvu sense of logic and crativit.
The biggest highlight studios such and such stuff because for some, be "BIG" is to buy what is more, it's as close to but watch out marketing, sponsorship and the socity of consumption in which we live.

There is no reason quune good mix appears from your home with RESOLV 65a

To recommend the report qualitprix excellent and the rest too.

Cest the man who tames the gear and not the other way but good design and all the rest ......

With exprience, it's a choice I would do without hsiter.

Musically,

First monitors in my possession, I was looking to replace my Hi-Fi set which I used to COSTS Systm of previously and whose trs trs trs silent rendering of what diffrent I had the headphones. So I have notice of an amateur who might be in enlighten others in the same case.
I orient my choice of product for the following reasons:

1 - opinions with other users among them, people who could compare this to other hardware range and this config in their home. This product seems plutt good for its class: power, speaker (diameter / bass response ,...), coloration of sound ergonomics.
I for one did not compare with other instructors, I would say that nanmoins 75W/25W are pretty impressive and I do not really see why they would need more. At home, the cost is 20% of the rgl max. Likewise, the diameter of the woofer provides a low return correct, at least Fidler. If I want more, I can always hook up my hi-fi amplifier
Ditto for the quality of sound, though I look, I see no diffrence for the time between his headphone and the sound of these monitors. Ergonomics is good unless you DCID to control the volume directly on the speakers. I use my table to mix the output level, continuously monitors both 20%.
Note, a mode of eco NRGi that cuts the amps after a while (I think 10 minutes) of inactivity.

2 - the price: yes, they are cheap so what? as a novice, has made me a little afraid to invest in this kind of hardware with an elastic my wallet. Two fingers to take the NF06A Thomann, half the price, I finally chose them by compromise between the popularity and price. I'm waiting to find someone who has to judge whether the NF06A it possible to have silent as well (relative to need) for even cheaper.

3 - I need: in an amateur home studio, in a room together without sound worthy of the name, these monitors are utiliss component cost for guitar / synthvoix Save to PC Waveterminal 192M through a POD2 a SBLive for drums / bass / synth and a Yamaha MG10 table / 2. It seemed to me that given the quality of the recording chain / restitution, nothing served to go higher in the range of monitors. I am satisfied with this choice trs in this context.

I use the entries symtriques TRS 6.3. These monitors have nanmoins XLR input (symtriques) or RCA (asymtriques).

SOUNDS

No noticeable diffrence over costs at the headphone.
Several possible rglages curve frequency drives (MID FREQ).
Clear, full, dynamic sound.
Low frequencies properly made.
Power to go bous.
Shielded environment without default for PC + screen + amp + effects + guitar ...

OVERALL OPINION

APRS 2 months of use, I am so far satisfied with this product trs.
Efficient, no frills.
On the form, these monitors are less sober than some other parraitront and the same shot a little less certain pros ... the blue LEDs are nice and the standby mode is welcome if you do not want to tamper Derri re every 5 mins.
I did not test other monitors and consquent, it is difficult to assess objectively the report qualitprix but since this product is among the cheapest in the range and it is perfect in my context of use, which must be one of many AF members, I would simply say that if c'tait again, would be the case without hsiter.
Purchased from Musik-Produktiv for 344? pair in 09/2004.

The watts on offer by these monitors have directed my choice.
I have also cost well over before! compared with several in the same game price.
for home studio use, models and mix small batteries compos ...
I directly connected my desk dpuis mix UB2442
PRS are my PC screen and spacings of 1.7m towards me following their axis 1.5m (!)
placed in a pice of 9m2 o is my battery and others.
I have a dja sgate (noise gate) home samson audio, the quality also convinced me that choice.

SOUNDS

I possdent for 1 week trs not yet critical, however:
- I have compared to the TRUTH B2031A and I believe that there is no photo (in the low and others).
even if it's not like I compare speakers prfr 2000 euros that aktiv Alesis, Behringer Truth, Roland DS50, who fail their ankles (to resolv65a I mean ...)
I think they lack Notore but will quickly find out ...
I found the Behringer super bad in low-medium and low Samson super good!
Stereo image is super Retailer, treble at all "fi" and the bass at all "loudness" Brief rgal and power ... selling for my pice of 9m2! ...
I think I would come back on DS for a while ...

OVERALL OPINION

The report qualitprix (320 euros) could not be sharper, go compare.
I read lots of opinions on behringer date, I am all the costs and compare:
nothing to do with the resolv65a, I think it is not in the same CATEGORY of stuff and all points of view (and finish) even if I say "ears adpend "I do not think the ...
I am not of this choice because for about 2000 bullets I'll be able to work without srieusement prtendre great job but just the correct ...

- 2-way active - bass reflex with wind laminar faade.
- Bi-amplified 75W bass + 25W (RMS well sr).
- Bandwidth (APRS to my doc) 45 Hz> 22 kHz

- Boomer 16.5 cm 6.5 "titanium tweeter and a 2.5 cm" pice with phasing.

- Between 1 XLR - 1 x RCA (gold plated!) - Jack from a 6.35 (symtrique and asymtrique)

- A volume and a correction of mdium the rear.
- Switch power on the rear.

I put 9 / 10 only because it would t better to put in rglages faade.

SOUNDS

Dpendant rglage of the mdiums (the rear knob), the sound can be completely neutral (mdium 0) - Stereo sound more (mdium -1) or strengthen mdium (NS10 and Genelec sound type).
Stereo image as it is exemplary. It locates each sound perfectly. In addition, these monitors are not too prescriptive, which keeps a good image Stromme so eccentric.

The sound is really clear trs including the entire spectrum. This also does not forgive bad mix with ...
The bass is perfect with Dfine mdium warm. The treble can not rest, as they are both trs "son" and powerful.

For the dynamic, trs important point: It is standard!

It's amazing what these monitors and especially restore cashing! I did not even pushed back so the volume is important is to say ...
The bass can be gentle but they can also hit hard, trs trs down low. And all this while remaining fully Dfine! No need to invest in a subwoofer, it would be too much for a cost of proximity. Besides, I do not understand Samson Specifies a BP on their site down 62 Hz, while on my note book with the speakers it is marked 45 Hz?!
All I can say is that it descends down. In any case below 62 Hz, sr!

So the dynamics, one word: HUGE!

OVERALL OPINION

I am in love since ending for a month.
I love their sound and their dynamic gnrale. The finish exudes quality. In fact I love everything about these monitors!

What I like least, though I find I can not find ... Finally, if the fact that they can be quite warm. But that does not appear to pose problem and must be Conuention for.

Actually, I tried other models such as M-Audio, Behringer B2030. I prfr Samson as the opinions are unanimous in the positive Resolv65. I found the bass and dynamics Dfine greater.
The report qualitprix is ​​excellent. The Samson Chres are the least of the three!

Without hsiter, I would do this choice. Moreover j'espre soon buy two pairs to switch to multichannel monitoring.

Future that require very recognized REFERENCE - A MUST

The technical specifications have not motivated my choice ... Yet they are good on paper trs. I say on paper, because in fact, the bandwidth, I do not Get You Started Verify that 65Hz, which is just to get my feet and lower in my mix (I make hiphop ). I work with to sound, to see my shots, and work my mixes, which is a big mistake. I remain persud they are sufficient to sound, and the limit, rev limit, to catch votes. Another pair would come in handy for the mix.

SOUNDS

It's the me that these speakers are a vritable problem: they do not sound neutral at all as I have seen on other reviews. They must be able to work with connatre. I'm working on it for two years or so, and I can not get used. We need a death shines in if you want to have a mix prcis and correct in a good majority of speakers. There is a big bump in the frquence prsence of voice, high-mdium therefore, is to place the voice trspnible correctly. Dynamic level, it is not bad, but it is not luxury.

OVERALL OPINION

If c'tatit again, I would opt for the M-Audio BX8. But I had not the budget era. Today I'm going lcher, I think, on Gnlec 1030APM, used 'the best I could cost from my work in DIFFERENT studio.

Uh, frankly I chose based on price and forums AF, thank you for all of you also because I do not really regret my choice.
Usage: trs small home studio to the electro. They had to be not too large as I step back. No wind the rear bass reflex in order to put the wall prs.
Config: they are powered by a sound card EDIROL UA 25

SOUNDS

I am not a professional sound, I do not know what value my ears. REFERENCE is my only my cost on my hardware HiFi "high end" (Onyx 713K2 JMLab speakers, amplifier and CD Onkyo Integra SERIES, wiring own blind). I just t bluff by the precision sound of the little things. The highs are sparkling trs, trs so well for monitor, the bass is good Submitted (this is also true that I am the corner between two walls which strengthens). They seem neutral, a bit aggressive in the treble, however, but again I find a good rev to compose. The image stro frankly with an amp for each cot I do not see how it could not be good ...
The sound is clear and for me trs prcis across the spectrum, but with a small hole in the mdium around 3500-3800Hz and then c my JMLab with a 3500-3800Hz tip? But I look for the hole because plutt aprsvrification lgre I had a hump in my qualisation this frquence qualiseur mastering. Mchant nothing anyway.
RULES are in neutral, may be I should change a. ..

OVERALL OPINION

I have for a month.
I love them, so much so that now I have CD Listen to it to thoroughly understand
C The least the power button and the stop-knobs of the adjustable rear, but well faade would not have made a pretty and would disrupt the sound.
I never cost of the monitors before them.
Report qualitprix really excellent, when I think of my 4500 euros Hifi together ... even if the cost is not the same it is true (the JMLab a strong if pete trs you get angry and without any disturbance!)
As long as I have not cost the other I Rasht same eyes closed

Last day 8.5
It's been a little more time than I use and I must say that even if I love them as always, I am somewhat in agreement with Brahma as to flicker. You really have acute Submitted trs and plutt in the upper part of the spectrum, for this to become standard on other Systmes of cost. So the ears are a lightweight blow because it gives her a trs aggressive, but the "benefit" is that one just a short and clear trs trs prcise of everything about things and other noises. So I go down in note 9.

- What characteristics have motivated your choice?

The advertised power, shielding, solid appearance, the look, the jack or XLR inputs, Mid control

- For what purpose?

Essentially the recording and listen to homestudio amp simulator (AdrenaLinn GNX4 and 2).

- What amp / What configuration? ...

65 announced ... and they are there!

SOUNDS

- The frequency curve is sufficiently neutral?

I find these speakers very neutral to the extent that high volume can become very tiring to the ears ... a small flat for mediums that need a little adjustment.
Send the bass you need without making the porridge that is a treat with my Gibson, whose character "serious" is historically said! The treble can just "whistle" at high speed.

- The stereo image is good?

Nickel chrome ... it changes from enciente multimedia ... we are in another world and become a treat mix when you're picky in the placement of sounds.

- The sound is clear and precise on the spectrum?

Yes, he is with the flat at high volume. But I am in a small room, gold, high volume is not sustainable ... so my flat is not "neutral"

- The dynamics are respected? ...

2norme momentum after several attempts elsewhere, is the main feature that made the song to bring these speakers.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?

4 months now

- What is so special that you like most and least?

As I said above ... dynamics huge, the bass really well (for a small room 12 m2).
What I like moisn is the power behind each speaker. Maneuver painful!
Attention as they heat up faster then carefully vented behind in your disposal ... inquiry, it is normal ...

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?

Uh ... yes there I think I try everything that exists on the market between 300 and 500 euros a pair!

- How would you rate the quality / price?

The value for money is excellent for those who want the real monitoring speakers that do not compensate with a large dynamic (bass and drums come out badly on these machines! My neighbors would love if they liked the music) and the bass response.

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...

Yes, without hesitation ... Now that I've found I'm not going to change anytime soon

What characteristics have motivated your choice?
For what purpose?

I needed the monitor to record, mix and mastering dessu and a small surplus puissanse n is thus seen not refuse the price and the reviews on Audiofanzine, I have purchased. (Thank you for that matter)

What amp / What configuration? ...

I work with cubase and hoontec DSP 2000

SOUNDS

The frequency curve is sufficiently neutral?

I think the midle and treble are very aggressive but only at home or because I've tried, it sounded good. (A medium sized piece with lots of echo floating)

The stereo image is good? The sound is clear and precise on the spectrum? The dynamics are respected? ...

I find that c is very decent for the price. Good image, its accurate (a bit) and a super BIG PLUS dynamique.UN C is the volume which is surprising, even powerful.

OVERALL OPINION

I have a year and the quality of my songs and much higher. J had tried it once and I know what tannoy that coutait 50,000 francs a pair and I think the quality difference n is not as important as price. I think before making the same choice, I would have tried the 50 who had perhaps better suited to my room but the 65 has a OCEEI well soundproofed, it makes good.

- What characteristics have motivated your choice?

Power spectrum, dimension

- For what purpose?

For the mix, record sound without coloration.

- What amp / What configuration? ...

amp not just out of my master table.
Mixer Ecler Smac Pro 40 + 2 CDJ800 (Pioneer)

SOUNDS

- The frequency curve is sufficiently neutral?

impec 'a bit too low, but otherwise nikel.

- The stereo image is good?

Yes, after this depends on the installation. but I think to have them at ear level is impeccable '...

- The sound is clear and precise on the spectrum?

yes just ds deep bass, ability to set mediums really well ...

- The dynamics are respected? ...

Yes.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?

for 5 months now.
- What is so special that you like most and least?

power, clear sound with no coloration, just as little power not fully exploitable to me, sniff! but operated in return for halloween pub they are hell

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?

no, I trust the opinions of several different monitoring, and make my choice, it's risky but I'm happy with the result.

- How would you rate the quality / price?

well.

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...

again and rather than 2 times

I chose these speakers because of the sound that I found simply beautiful. In the limit I was afraid that was a little too flattering. This reassured me (besides the reviews on the Internet) is the possibility of digging mdiums costs more for a hi-fi, or the booster to work "a scalpel" on the sound. I have AIM as the reserve of power.

SOUNDS

I lack comptence to compare other monitors. What I know is that the CD is costing me a lot of rvl dtails in almbums trs though I knew well. I hear more about these speakers Lesme anoint nuances of legalization or compression on my costs Previous (stereo) would pass inapperu. The cost is unforgiving for treble: I think it's a good quality. The "boom" psycho-acoustic bass is Submitted, which may be more questionable for the mix but can work with a certain pleasure to cost you, that counts too.

OVERALL OPINION

Before I got to mix with almost 4 months just to cost a max of her through. My first mix with them t have catastrophic costs when I have elsewhere. In fact I had to learn mixing with them. So I'm not sr they can be described as truly neutral?

But now I understand how they work, I can really make a mix that goes everywhere, I've never been able to make up Submitted. In fact it should be understood that any dtail is enhanced so you can afford not to mix too "wise" one lment emerges only on the monitors disparate compltement on costs hi-fi. Low that "booment" just all become sour in my car! In short, a can mix a little nag and be a finesse rsultat . Do own these speakers or is it the case for any costs of the studio, I do not know, but for résumé:

YES, we can make a good mix trs prcis with these monitors, but you have to learn to use them. Moi took me 9 months.

In short, I can not compare with the other, but they do get what I bought, and if c'tait again, in the present state of things, I will resume.