All user reviews for the Samson Technologies Resolv 65a

What characteristics have motivated your choice?

bi amplification: 75 watts and 25 watts for the tweeter.
30Hz-30kHz bandwidth and a + - 3 db.
45Hz-20kHz and a + - 3 db.
For what purpose?
home studio, home mix.


What configuration? ...
connected to motu traveler

SOUNDS

- The frequency curve is sufficiently neutral?
- The stereo image is good?
- The sound is clear and precise on the spectrum?
- The dynamics are respected? ...
nothing to say.

modif after 5 days, ca still a bit flatter, cest hard hard to balance anyway to go anywhere on a mix of several support sheets.
but I must say jai never heard my mix that's how it scales, cest still very clear.

OVERALL OPINION

Nothing to say.
jai tried two models of Tapco, fostex 2, 1 ... Berhinger (What a waste of time the Behring)
unbeatable value for money.

This notice is the 3rd version. Does the update brings a result of r-cost of Yamaha MSP5 (which I also possde). The comparison is made here based on MSP5 (MSP3 are the part, I have therefore cart. Another factor is also taken into account, it is a question of prices and Resolv65a MSP5. As Samsons cotent cheaper, they are of between 2 of 10 paintings in all.
Points +:
_ Boomer 16cm (only 13 MSP5)
_ XLR and RCA Jack idpendants (no RCA MSP5).
_ Event bass forward.
_ Knob good and enjoyable dimension to the touch.
_ Good power (in my room of 16m, the level is 1/10me knob of his race).
_ Rglage Mid Presence.
Points -:
_ knob level of the rear and not Crant (the MSP5 have crantset are before).
_ No heat sink, hot plate rear bcp (the MSP5 do not even warm in their thanks t sink large caliber).
_ No calibration Bass / Treble (Yes for MSP5).
_ The blue plastic entourrant the speakers to give an amateur aspect monitors (the MSP5 is to look more pro).
_ Measurements of distortion and impdance of between not listed by Samson (yes Yamaha).

SOUNDS

+ Points:
_ Image Stro acceptable (less lgrement Dfine that MSP5).
_ The bank is quite frquences homogne.
_ The Mid Presence diversified somewhat the cost.

Points -:
_ Noise intrinsque speakers quite audible, especially when a heater does bcp. At low volume you can hear them. The MSP5 have not this problem: the noise of the tweeters are noticeable that less than 3cm.
_ Spatialization front / rear less audible than MSP5.
_ The serious but remain insufficient Submitted MSP5 that (thanks to the boom by 16 cm)
_ Tiring high volume (the MSP5 are less aggressive). One has the impression that Resolve65a cry, that is fairly empty on vocals. The Ssss ZZS and put forward are too empty and too compared to MSP5.

OVERALL OPINION

These monitors have been operating for four years ending for. I don 't use it to listen to music. I 've never had a problem with them and they still work (and MSP3 Resolve65a / 5). But as you can see, the sound of Samsons is not exceptional. This is a little to infrieur MSP5, although it there is a little more bass. The background music is more perceptibels and richer on the Yamaha. The default that are audible (bp mix) on the Samsons are also on MSP5, but I have the feeling that the Samsons exagrent. This feeling becomes even more empty of the voices (like Mr. Carey re: the MSP5 she cries a little instead of singing, but the Samsons she cries even more). 2 MODELS on, it lacks the clear across the spectrum: a veil more pronounced on the Samsons. That said, even when MSP5 are clearer at the top mdium and treble.

Finally, it is empty that s should not wait to wonder what price l. Nowadays, the offers are extensive, the Resolv65a REPRESENTATIVES not have much of intrts like 4 years ago.

I use to mix my models with the Korg D3200,
is the preamplified
25W acute
75W bass

SOUNDS

I chose the RESOLV65A for accuracy and good dynamic
just before, the seller made me listen to PRODIPE (FRO) which lacks clarity and momentum, I quickly made my choice.

the upper midrange is a little tough

lacks a little low but we must know how to use

OVERALL OPINION

I use them for 4 months

I tried ALESIS (its very light, as acute)
of PRODIPE (sound like the speakers to buy SUPER U)
M-AUDIO (better to take a hi-fi)

decent value for money
the sound is good, I know not what they will give over time

I bought this more pair of speakers by following the advice of my dealer in comparison to others. C'tait qualitprix the report I was looking for the era: a time that fell within my budget, both the sound I liked right away (I must say that I went to Coutes trsmdiocres!).
I used these speakers for 4 years to monitor any type of sound and music work.

SOUNDS

The curve is obviously not neutral on this type of product trs affordable. The serious and are prcis plutt well doss but lack potato, dynamics. They do not descend below trs but given the size of HP is a bit normal! The low-mids are poorly Defines and mediums plutt correct. L o these speakers do a good job is in the high-mids: prcis and highlighted (may sound rude to some) they put the bare signal fawn Drout (the slightest false note, any cart on a song, a saxophone or violin means right away). These speakers are quite effective for the treatment of voices and other sounds whose spectral energy is concentrated in areas like frquentielles.
The image is good stro condition of being well located in relation to the speakers: the correct position located in a well prcise! ! So pay attention to placement, if the image changes a lot, not to mention the rpartition treble.
What m'amne that they are quite aggressive and a little whistling in the ear training ... Not so good in fact!

OVERALL OPINION

But then when the same price ... INTERESTED!
APRS four years of using these speakers are good for me to learn to fawn monitoring cheaply. Exprience with it comes to find their limits, little by little, and what better? This proves that the hearing is refined. ^ ^

65a seemed to me the most right in the range of choices and prices that I had my disposal.

SOUNDS

Curve, as discussed below, is not neutral at the same time that the price should not dreaming too much either!
The sound is still quite good in quality price ratio. Low that in fact does not descend very low but are all the same presents, even if he lacks a bit. The lower medium is rough, I confirm. the correct medium. For the upper medium are clearly highlighted. Attention is misleading in a mix. Despite everything I find in all the dynamics is not very well respected. The stereo image seems to me everything is okay.

OVERALL OPINION

The purchase of my FIRst monitoring speakers. The landed cost from a small panel of choice.
I was left with the idea of ​​buying the Yamaha HS50 which are medium rvl too acute, with a lack of bass.
I mix with for over 4 years.
Even if they now seem anachronistic, it sharpens my ear!
For beginners they are really not bad.