All user reviews for the Roland JUNO-G
|3 reviews||43 %|
|3 reviews||43 %|
|1 user review||14 %|
gianni34's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
-Can simply plug it into your computer (I work a few times on logic pro audio with this synth)
120-polyphony notes (more than enough for the sounds of piano sustain pedals but still required to get good sound)
-The setup is simple to type a regular synth, but you still had a lot of both if you want to tamper with the sound. I often splits that are a long program.
I play in a rock band, progressive metal, I was looking for a versatile synthe possdant a piano bocoup correct and sounds of synthetic, groundwater and the powerful leader.
I tried a korg tr Premire but I dcu t by the sounds. Then a roland juno-g I t sduit by some tablecloths.
the tablecloths are excellent but lack gnral lgrement of agressivit for my taste.
lead the same ^ ^
piano own (hint: add the reverb and use the sustain pedal!)
Low: not bad at all
organ: I do not like the hammond organ
Electric pianos: Fender rodes nice not bad at all!
Ethnic sounds: large variety of choice!
Problem in general: I find the time to change the sound too long.
I use it for 6 months it suits me very well for my progressive rock band (like Dream Theater).
I love the versatility of this synth.
incomparable quality price ratio, but you must love the roland sound.
I would do this choice! certe hammond organs fail me but he has other quality
1 people found this review helpful
cotto's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
The configuration is simple but it takes a bit to get to the rowing menu souhaitbr /> a very useful guide for exploring the deep juno g (french)
700 звуков половину обычной бросали в Roland
карт возможность SRX у меня платины на Юнона и коллекции мира, но mc909 карты составляет 210 евро больше за диапазон звуков ЗАИНТЕРЕСОВАНА
по отношению к внутренним звуки Juno довольно фортепиано, несколько слоях синтезаторов забава для остальных Bof!
Я иду к воздействию Samplitude через ПК
I use it for 3 months
bought nine 750 euros is a good product for the price
AIM requires any thing before tournament roland
1 people did not find this review helpful
parafuso's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
There are 1260 ROM waveforms
(This figure is not indicated on the site)
I had a Korg M1 12 years ago and since I did not touch one
keyboard while forcing the possibilities have nothing to do.
Sounds are easily accessible (sorting categories) but
the edition, it needs to be faire.Le edition software is handy.
The manual (books in English and in French ...) is clear but must be handled, there is no miracle before
make the most a few Sundays cloister the house without it.
The squenceur very easy despite the small screen (compared to screens
TritonExt and FantomX) but I use that comes with SonarLe.
The edition of combinations (performance) is very easy.
The sounds are varied (classic styles, modern appliances, sound effects and bizar phew) with good acoustic and ethnic instrumentals.
It is true that some patches are totally unnecessary and Incas in a component (such as "autotrance" "groove007" or robot voice "try this" etc ...)
Another criticism of the drumskits (there are certainly a lot but sometimes unnecessary noises ..)
But there are 768 patches with 256 editable is more than enough to customize any a.
The effects are numerous and give a real dimension to sounds,
multitimbral mode but can be used as 3 insert effects (which is not bad compared to the TR or X50).
The controller is DBeam funny but I can not find it indispensable. (One would be more useful after touch)
Note the Possibility of importing samples to create patches via the memory card (not included) and therefore the possibility to sample ....!
But I have yet to try everything audio.
It is mandatory to add RAM, 4MB (23secondes of registered) is not much.
After one week of use, I'm glad trs!
Varis and sounds good, easy to use, provided the soft drinks are a real plus.
His report is unbeatable qualitprix (compared to TR, X50 and MO6).
I manipulbr />-X and the TR-50 (which sound really good but there are fewer features)
Motif6es it (but it is not comparable)
-Juno-d and (I immediately remove from the list after the hearing)
Later I would take probably an SRX (world collection), but used.
Sufficiently large-screen end
-Quality of general synthbr />-variety of sounds
-Edition patch and multitimbral mode possible via PC
-Sequencer succeeded, and software "Sonar The" provided
-4 Output jack
RAM-home almost zero
Price-€ 300 extensions SRX
1 people found this review helpful
jfherts's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Controller standard (volume, modulation, and 2-3 bend funny stuff as the cutoff etc. ..)
4 audio outputs
The keys are slightly smaller than the norm, but you get done I think.
Trs intuitive use. I did not open many of the manual.
The sound for the price are really not bad at all. I find it versatile trs, trs is the wide range of sounds to me sounds acoustic, some electric pianos, strings, clavinet, pads, leads, pulse, and electronic sounds plutt efficient, etc. ...
I bought it because my JV 80 loose slowly. And it's a gnration suprieure (logic). The sound is much softer, fuller, cleaner. Sounds s'intgrent dj trs well in a mix (if well chosen).
At most I use it, the more I tell myself that I made the right choice.
I have long hsit with other models in the same price range. I find the report qualitprix really impressive. You can really do a lot of things with this keyboard. There are a few features that make using INTERESTED trs enjoyable.
I just fear for her strong. It is trslger (too may be) and j'espre the buttons hold up a little more than a year and a half. We'll see.
For the price: 9 / 10
----------- EDIT ------------
Voil ... just a small point ngatif makes me a little scared for the long term because the screen does not really support the hot. So play in the sun is clearly deprecated! Dernirement, the screen really does not place an AIM (the shadow) but with a heat intense enough and powerful enough spots 2-3 m). I agree that it is deprecated to play with a machine of this kind in such conditions, but I find that it is sensitive enough.
1 people found this review helpful
petitsynthe's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Very easy to use
Many presets are unusable as part of an arrangement and difficult to mix them. it is necessary to tweak the filters and effects to make it sound
acoustic sounds lagging behind the competition but all the same correct
beautiful tablecloths, good synth sounds
the addition of an SRX is almost essential as it greatly improves qualitée presets
Purchased for 8 months, I am generally satisfied it is very well to models quickly but when the sound is even below what can be done with a computer
synthetic sounds in general
the simple and powerful sequencer
possibilities to record audio tracks that will be fully integrated with MIDI tracks
sampler basic but very useful ability to import waveforms and loops and use them as a Patch
certain sounds frankly useless and a bit overwhelmed
keyboard keys feel too soft and shorter than normal
srx card prices
I do it again this choice may be that the price of a pattern are currently nine'd hesitate
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
channelOD's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
- Polyphony 128
- Report qualitprix exceptional
- Manuel course in french (it was purchased or you??)
- For those who have the habit of Roland, ds is the continuity ...
- For those who have used the Yamaha Motif, a breeze!
- Squenceur ultra-intuitive, 4 audio tracks possible
- Keyboard synth trs of good quality (personal opinion)
Well it is called Juno more for marketing than anything else because it really is a versatile synth. While it sounds pretty typical of the old Roland synths (Junos, Jupiter8, Jx, TB303, etc. ...), the rhodes and Wurli I love, Mellotron, Fairlight type synth voices (remember Art of Noise!), tablecloths gentle, leads well-edged ...
But also very good acoustic sounds: Listen to the folk and electric guitars ...!!! Good piano sound (better than Reason, not talking about the Korg ...), of strings ... Trs good ethnic sounds, flutes, shaku, sitar, etc ...
So yes, there are sound effects as pointed out earlier opinion. But have to see where! It is closer to that of Distorted Reality quack qd Himself! Are there other sound banks that the bank costs which are not GM? (See review previous ones)
Ok it makes a synth bastard for some, but I would rather versatile ... You can do everything with ... And you saw the price?
Anonymous 's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Connects to industry, 128 voice poly ... etc etc ... (see the official website: p)
An impressive number of sounds (but also an impressive number of sounds useless and unusable my taste)
4 audio tracks as well ... but you buy a synth for MIDI eh? (And to see how the guitars make the synth: a joke (despite the 78 presets Varis little anyway) connect the PC with a large jack-converter mini jack and rendering is the same ... if cot is the audio you are interested in the juno g. .. buy an audio interface!
But despite some attractive CHARACTERISTICS ... unfortunately, it changes little from synths we have on the market today ... and that damn feeling that stagnates at the roland sound is particularly frustrating. ..
Yamaha clearly gives the impression of modified without stop (not yet j'tais party to lean towards the yamaha sounds, but must admit that is.)
Trs trs intuitive, it's no problem, we change the sounds without any problems navigating in the menus just trs (large hand over the quality of the screen, just standard) is cr e its sounds easy etc etc ...
The ease of use is exemplary and the screen plays a crucial role ...
Caution in full manual in English (in french edition expected by some time, ask your dealer, normally it gratos (still happy you might say)
I will not dwell on the point since there is no reproach.
The simplicity caractrise further juno G that quality.
Well, here we are, I think the big downside ... dailleurs existential darkness.
The realism of certain sounds is city insert (I think the violins and the following sounds: Gang Strange and Syn Opra)
But the problem is that hundreds of sounds on offer (again my opinion) take a clearly techno (trs of bad-quality-sound unclassifiable and lctriques mdiocres-going square ment with sound effects! it's great: 1000 to hear a dog aboit, a car that crashed, a door that opens ... but oh no roland Bravo!
And the fashion these days: you press a button it's been the music (this is common with all the synths I have yamaha test (I'm not talking about the Korg TR, I jou not above)
I find even more to my words ... evokes the 'quality (?) Sounds on offer ...
On the VLOC to capture all the subtleties of the sounds, it is advisable to activate it, but what price ... it is not natural at all my taste, as it is forced is not permitted by the effects cons are correct.
Based on patches (which I reviewed 100 times) I have a special affection for the violin (hats off) and some fall quite successful overall.
As against the SRX are trs convincing ... but 300 more per card to enjoy the synth here's what ...
A word about sound audio dj presents:
The young lady who is "um oh yeah, can u dig a girl like me? I think i love you ..." loop and its partner does not know that "yeah k'mon! uh uh" ... frankly it sounds with those they hope to convince the public? (Dailleurs we hear in the videos in BMD.)
I t also a bit of quality in terms of patterns from the dynamic again, Yamaha MO6. But none of trs marking either, let's say it was not really that EHJV in juno G.
(I'm certainly severe trs in my rating is subjective Obviously it is only my opinion and my tastes. Try it, do not rely totally on my personal appreciation, but think what I say I am not far from the goal trs ...)
How long have you use it?
I speak in the pass I sold (and yes dj), so I used one week (I've certainly not seen everything, but the 3 / 4 of what I have seen no I was not given a clear desire to continue playing it).
I read on a forum someone said that the juno g sounded less than the pro YAMAHA MO6 ... and I confirm! It stinks of full ears superficial, no depth, no expression for 9/10me ... it sounds hollow, it any, trs is disappointing, I expected for so long, well it's the slap in the wrong direction ... the term
Dmonstrations in the video on the official website (https://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.aspx?ObjectId=756&ParentId=72) reflect the quality trs well overall synth note c ' well, they could lie, but not what we are the sounds!
though I am saying is that BMD but not etc etc ... and no!
3 videos of roland on the official website (above) are not sufficient to reach the ankle BMD YAMAHA MO6
No, frankly, for a hundred dollars more, I highly recommend TRS which is precisely the MO6 much warmer sound in color, although BMD in orientating techno, it offers a depth not negligible (and I'm not pro yamaha at all, I test today)
(And then what do they have our manufacturers we refourguer sound effects in our synths? Is a modern music?)
I will return to correct any errors on this opinion, maybe a little post on a whim, but there is nothing better than whim to bring out the (sad) vrit!
5 of 6 people found this review helpful