N/D468 classified ad
New ad alertImages
Reviews
5.0/5(2 reviews)
50 %
Write a user review
N2h2Very good mic for its price.
Published on 09/14/11 at 04:51 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Hypercardioid microphone instruments. Phantom power supply not required.
OVERALL OPINION
Purchased a year ago (€ 209) together with a shure SM57 (cheaper) with the aim to sample the battery and record the guitar.
In the end compared to the SM57 sound is better, because the microphone is less rough than the SM 57 BEYOND 12,000 Hz
Used on snare drum, the report was the height of our expectations, same for the cymbals (although some will find it just a bit at this level).
For toms is also pafait.
Not bad for the bass drum kick but not low enough for the "pom".
Tested also on clarinet and flute, violin, he came out brilliantly every time.
At low rendering is satisfactory,...…
OVERALL OPINION
Purchased a year ago (€ 209) together with a shure SM57 (cheaper) with the aim to sample the battery and record the guitar.
In the end compared to the SM57 sound is better, because the microphone is less rough than the SM 57 BEYOND 12,000 Hz
Used on snare drum, the report was the height of our expectations, same for the cymbals (although some will find it just a bit at this level).
For toms is also pafait.
Not bad for the bass drum kick but not low enough for the "pom".
Tested also on clarinet and flute, violin, he came out brilliantly every time.
At low rendering is satisfactory,...…
Read more
Hypercardioid microphone instruments. Phantom power supply not required.
OVERALL OPINION
Purchased a year ago (€ 209) together with a shure SM57 (cheaper) with the aim to sample the battery and record the guitar.
In the end compared to the SM57 sound is better, because the microphone is less rough than the SM 57 BEYOND 12,000 Hz
Used on snare drum, the report was the height of our expectations, same for the cymbals (although some will find it just a bit at this level).
For toms is also pafait.
Not bad for the bass drum kick but not low enough for the "pom".
Tested also on clarinet and flute, violin, he came out brilliantly every time.
At low rendering is satisfactory, it captures very well the "Ronron" food and do not low frequencies.
On the guitar, be it clean, crunch or heavy saturation, rendering each aa was better compared to the SM57, much less make a correction on a mix, the frequency ranges are made broader and more balanced.
It has also been tested on the song, we were very happy (after all it was not tested in the group, singing is only guttural / screamed. No clear path)
Right now it is also used to amplify the kick of the bass drum (which is a bit lightweight in repeated if not amplified), never had the problem of non-transplanted Larcena or other desirable instu.
At present it is still our favorite for recording micro compared to the same range of microphones.
it'll be a remake, so I again without hesitation, and so I will take two has to do instead of taking an SM57, the price difference he has with this one is greatly justified.
The only thing that I blame him that's form, but hey you knew before you buy.
OVERALL OPINION
Purchased a year ago (€ 209) together with a shure SM57 (cheaper) with the aim to sample the battery and record the guitar.
In the end compared to the SM57 sound is better, because the microphone is less rough than the SM 57 BEYOND 12,000 Hz
Used on snare drum, the report was the height of our expectations, same for the cymbals (although some will find it just a bit at this level).
For toms is also pafait.
Not bad for the bass drum kick but not low enough for the "pom".
Tested also on clarinet and flute, violin, he came out brilliantly every time.
At low rendering is satisfactory, it captures very well the "Ronron" food and do not low frequencies.
On the guitar, be it clean, crunch or heavy saturation, rendering each aa was better compared to the SM57, much less make a correction on a mix, the frequency ranges are made broader and more balanced.
It has also been tested on the song, we were very happy (after all it was not tested in the group, singing is only guttural / screamed. No clear path)
Right now it is also used to amplify the kick of the bass drum (which is a bit lightweight in repeated if not amplified), never had the problem of non-transplanted Larcena or other desirable instu.
At present it is still our favorite for recording micro compared to the same range of microphones.
it'll be a remake, so I again without hesitation, and so I will take two has to do instead of taking an SM57, the price difference he has with this one is greatly justified.
The only thing that I blame him that's form, but hey you knew before you buy.
See less
70
»
rrolandPublished on 03/03/10 at 10:45 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Ultra cardio dynamic microphone. It should be taken for guitar amps, snare, percussion ...
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for years. On a snare drum, it is part of one of my prfrs. It makes good lme character of the snare, and captures well the tone, even from above (it is almost unnecessary to add a microphone for the stamp when using a ND468).
If it is well positioned, there is almost no repisse Charleston, which is apprciable. The eyeball is practical. Good mic not very expensive.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for years. On a snare drum, it is part of one of my prfrs. It makes good lme character of the snare, and captures well the tone, even from above (it is almost unnecessary to add a microphone for the stamp when using a ND468).
If it is well positioned, there is almost no repisse Charleston, which is apprciable. The eyeball is practical. Good mic not very expensive.
90
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Electro-Voice
- Model: N/D468
- Category: Dynamic Microphones
- Added in our database on: 04/05/2004
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in Microphones
Other names: n d468, nd468, n d 468, n/d 468, n/d468