All user reviews for the Zoom G9.2tt

All the major guitar effects are available
The technology is mixed transistor + 2 lamps to magnify the sound.
Sounds ditables pc.
Connectivity complte.

UTILIZATION

Simple configuration.
shipping simple for those who know dja multi-effects.
Manual clear and sufficient.

SOUND QUALITY

Effects effective and responsive.
I use a Variax 500 and I did not choose the effect of multi brand.
The sound is good for trs amp simulations.
The pRSET trs are bad, not to be trusted.
I like wha, the fuzz, things analog tape. I like the grain brought by the lamps.
Although sr loadings are simulated and do not replace a real amp close to the feedback.
However the zoom is enough for me to save.
The sound quality is excellent.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for several months.
OCCAZ bought 300 euros.
I tried the others who are in the same price range (from 250 600 euros) and it is one I prfre.
The report price for a quality multi purpose prampli lamps is unbeatable.

Everything was preceded tell ment with an amp simulator lampe.Possibilité of the patch was edited using the PC and a USB MIDI cable

UTILIZATION

This is my first multi-effects, so I learned to use it without any basis in the field:
very simple configuration, it is industry, we support the small button and op is fun to party with the following patch for the standard edition is easy to see how it works my day is enough to know everything changed. Well, since I'm not very good I did not have midi-usb cable and therefore I recorded all manuellement.Le manual is pretty clear on the general use of the device but to connect it to pc still a little fuzzy. very good point nonetheless the g9!

SOUND QUALITY

The standard sounds are really so so I play with two days and after I modified against the possibility of parameter setting are enormous patch is an extension of thought almost illimitée.donc for sounds bad at first, but as soon as we know it all settled we're happy! I use an ibanez with steve vai and an amp marshall 30th anniversary all-tube and a roland cube60 (the sound is obviously ...). meillure with the marshall distortion with excellent simulation and mesa boogie marshall are very good I think the wah-wha are good especially the "vox" and "cry" which are beautiful.

OVERALL OPINION

I use this multi for 3 months and have a blast like crazy by repeating and loved me (not test it live) I love the amp simulations and the ability to set as its desired sons.c ' is also my first pedal and I think it's simply the best value for money because I am not misinformed before you buy to get things right. this is my four that I have that choice and I would do without hesitation.

The ZOOM G9 2tt is an amp simulator and a multi-effect (2 time)

Attention, although sturdy and heavy gear.

UTILIZATION

The edition sounds manually is not what I prfre, I got used to the PC edition, so much more comfortable. The edition is hand may not be the most intuitive.
To change sound patch, go on:
" http://giasso.s42.eatj.com/ZooM/home.jsp "gnial.

Giasso thank you.

Otherwise, you will appreciate the management on the PC.

SOUND QUALITY

APRS over two years of use, I can not say enough boxes:

- Beautiful;
- Superb;
- Large;
- Hot
- Pure;
- Trs net;

It's beautiful.

The lamps of origin may be not the best. They can be changed by tubes and get better quality sound even better. However, APRS trying even if you can have a more expressive and richer still, it is not obvious that new lamps are adapted to the simulations, which are, I think, Established on the basis of original lamps (with new lights that I tried I could not find the sound of boogie msa Fidler also the original home with the lights).

Effects (including reverb and chorus) trs are good and enhanced by the sound of the lamps.

Never seen until Submitted with a built-in sound as good.
Some say the lights are for the Global Warming sound. From a technical point of view this may be the case, your exact as it is HUGE.

OVERALL OPINION

APRS 2 years of use:

Most:

- The warm sound, natural.
- The basic sound is trs "end" means finely the sound of each string. sounded more "end" with the acoustic simulation, add a chorus on the whole and is ultra thin and Christalin.
- The game concervé of elasticity and rebound (a trs is important).
- Possibility according rglages (eq, comp, or to obtain gain ...), sounds so sweet trs trs sharp / slammin, through sounds very fat or very s sales (bcp opportunities, jazz, and grungeman mtalleux surely find their happiness).
- Configuration from the pc, it is simply gnial (plus, no need to break the back).
- The expression PDAL 3D is really nice, although not too useful (vzaiment luxury).
- I particulirement simulations Msa Boogie and Marshall.
- Other effects are good and trs trs own (flanger, trmolo, rverbe, chorus and many others).
- The acoustic guitar simulation: trs good.
Other simulations interreassante: metal zone, tube screamer, fuzz, Proco RAT.
- J'apprcie really qualiser strips (6 strips), I prfre qualiser this one parameter.

Or the + or -:

- The distos paratrent may resemble each other. This is true for some. In fact, some are similar.
To get the best of each simulation, it is the rgler qualisation. It is true that without some rglages Prior may be similar. And that can dcevoir at first.
At the same time I think every multi-effects sound basis of its own and I say that APRS having a Zoom 3000, Boss GT8 tried, heard on VOX ToneLab who all have their basis of their own (I did not like at all for that matter, that of the BOSS GT8, too sharp, snapping and cold (numrique)).
- Contrary to the opinion of "Greenbean" above, there is no breath of clean sounds and sometimes a little breath on distos shoots, but the gate is effective and trs every breath is withdrawn in the blink of an eye, with an ease dconcertante, without detriment to the sound.

The -:

- No sustainer (see with the existing compressors), it was a shame.
- No simulation of the synth (but the effect can vibe reminds the synth in a different kind).
- The effect "String", which can delay the arrival of sound to imitate the sound of a violin is not adjustable enough (it should be possible to further shorten the time limit minimum delay (the effect comes with too much delay)).
- No arpgiateur, it was less severe.
- Attention buttons rglages numriques may have problem with running time (and not rare when it happens irrmdiable).
- Manual editing of the sounds could be more intuitive (especially for qualisation would have required manual drawbars).
- The rponse of BCAN frquence in the pc via a graph for qualisation t would be the icing on the cake (too bad).
- The pedals are well whawha but to get a better prsence (I think that is worth the real high-end analog pedals dunlop crybaby type and others ...) however the potential for r adjuster are quite large.

Q: Some people want to change the lights to install better.
I tried the JJ Tesla and Golden Dragon, not bad, silent sound warmer, but less prcis. And finally, some sounds are dnaturs from the original. The simulation becomes more msaboogie any, when she was the characters.
In the end, I think the original lamps were chosen for t go with the amp simulations. So I choose to keep them.

I say, thank you for this pdalier ZOOM bold, who really wants these promises sound issue. The best sound I've encountered this type of pdalier.Il Only VOX ZOOM and that I take up this challenge, others will do well to consider.

Ds that the fate of his hair is on the bluff thing, something solid in a class of hell ... I'm interested!
Then they branch (and as a microwave, it does not open the user manual), and l. .. it falls on the pRSET plants ... A little too artificial I gots, but has come!
Then from one thing to hack is the trick, and LA ..... is the cata! This contraption is incredibly incomprhensible ds getting started, ways stuff, this patch, modules tartempions ... So as qu'tres censs human and intelligent than we are, we open the manual of the beast, and finally a s'claircit!
The two 12AX7 Chinese are provided by tubes change worthy of the name (DD, EH, GE ...).
With the new effects processor ZOOM ZX-3, we go groping and everything seems to come naturally! What happiness! Even if we regret the absence of a looper Intgr like its cousin the BOSS GT-10 ... But hey, we forgive him happy when discovering the amp simulations that are absolutely stupendous, and effects .... hummmm a rgal!
And attention ladies and gentlemen, there are two pedals of expression ... including a one possdant rglage vertical and horizontal, so that you get to the final three pedals! of happiness ...
However, I am lover of vintage analog sound, but I must admit that this bug me bluff. I play a stratocaster 96-US as well as a deluxe reverb reissue 65 and I play mostly blues, funk, reggae, and this allows me to pdalier have more varieties of sound as int drought, although I only use basic effects like a phaser, a wah (ALSO TRY THE SIMULATION OF THE VOX V847 !!!!!!), delay, tape echo, etc ...
But .... breath ... little, but the same breath as ... That said, I'm a little perfectionist on the banks finally ...

UTILIZATION

Apart from the first steps with this pdalier, use is actually quite simple. I do not know, moreover, too many advise dcortiquer the manual with the guitar on hand.
But one thing to hell on this little wonder is the USB interface that transmits the signal from a PC avecun Sampling 96kHz at 24 bits (the processor as it processes the signal in 32bit).
On scne, a self-evident, if only one ale prpar patches and banks of effects that dchirent the sound barrier ... All fawns in this thing there is a total of 200 patches, so there is room unless you Soyer David Gilmour and Jean Michel Jarre.
In the studio or home, you have a sound Stereo, trs useful for 2 channel effects spars or a nice panning

SOUND QUALITY

Excellent, pdalier normment respects the instrument! Aside from a little breath that the only efficiently remove noisegate

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a year and ....
My that!! It is given that the price! I LIKE IT!
I do it again 569 times if this purchase c'tait possible (one in the car, a home, one at work, on the terrace ...)

There are all possible effects (see product features).
We can arrange in any order you want.
All parameters are editable via MIDI / USB to PC.
The computer interface is very easy to use. Without the GUI computer adjusting the pedal quickly becomes a hell.
Zoom G9.TT uses two lamps in addition to digital technology. The sound is warm.
Level connections, 2 outputs (stereo), midi in / out.On can also add an external effects loop that can pilot using a button.

Foot level, it is equipped with two pedals one of which includes two axes. Pure gadget that does not serve me. We can condemn it.
Their disadvantages: a short stroke.

UTILIZATION

The general configuration is simple as long as the program using a PC.
The manual is clear and well explained.
Editing sounds is easy and changing a setting fairly quickly if you know how it is affected knob. The small screen still gives some explanation.

SOUND QUALITY

The effects are very good in the sense that they are fully customizable.
This implies that we will always arrive at the desired, but it will take some time to get there.
I use it with my Samick electric guitar and an Ovation electro.
I have no favorite effects in the sense that the effects are there to make a sound.
I'm not back, I seek not to imitate a particular sound. I make my sounds for my taste.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 6 months, and I begin to learn to code jute.
It is very good but quite complex compared to many editable parameters, but it's also why I took it .
Previously I was using a Boss SE-70. The advantage is that during the transition, I could put my Boss loop outside and continue to use the sounds of it (by adding lamps u Zoom!)
Quality / price ratio excellent compared to what it brings.

I do it again this choice without hesitation.

Many possibilities that can not find devices that much more expensive:

- Effects loop (for the 4 cable method, for example)
- 2.5 expression pedals 100% programmable (the lateral pedalle want a little gadget, it is true)
- Interface usb / asio for the sound (a time of this writing, no driver windows 7)
- Two small lamps to warm the sound
- It is noon (which I did not try) and you can program presets via MIDI and a computer.

UTILIZATION

The setup is clear and very complete. We can do almost everything. The manual is excellent.

SOUND QUALITY

Well then this is the whole problem in my opinion ... The sounds are super bad for my taste. It sounds bad, even to my ears beginners. I had the opportunity to buy to make 4CM what he has done wonders with a small tube preamp. Even so, hard to get excited about the effects (and amp models, I tried not too but it's the same barrel). Example: There are plenty of different reverb, but numerical modeling of rooms (bathroom, hall, stadium, etc.). It is not necessarily dégeux, but it looks nothing like a reverb amp, and it's hard enough to blow exploited.
I changed my amp for a big head lamp, and did some test: 4CM and bypass (guitar input - input zoom - zoom effect send - amp input, and all the effects turned off on the photo) the sound is already slightly compressed and a few harmonics through the cracks. So beware, even in bypass is not neutral!
So it will go 100% effects loop, so I just remove it completely from the signal and enjoy all the effects when my j'enclenche loop (anyway modeled pedals do not sound well enough to justify that we put them before the preamplifiers).

I put 4 points anyway, because the simulation is super convincing HP to play with headphones, the boost doesn't hurt and there are a lot of choice noisegate which can be useful.

OVERALL OPINION

That will make 6 months since I have it, the sound never convinced me even out of the box with the pleasure of novelty (and yet I'm quite a beginner at all demanding). It seemed to me at the time of purchase that I would sacrifice for his abilities, and it did not miss even if I did not expect such a record. But in retrospect, in value for money there's no much to say, since it has incredible potential for this price range. If I had to redo the election in the same circumstances I would do it again, since no other device has all the opportunity at this price. However in hindsight I do not have enough effect and now I can choose the quality of some analog pedals that sound good in the place of a super multi-effect that does everything but very moderately.

Note that my diet has cramer fairly quickly exchanged without question but with a lot of time by the importer (business managed by my store).

I have been in contact with Zoom japan direct mail for some questions, they are very responsive and very competent.

pa I will list them all, it is editable via PC, is a rack-mount model, tech lamps and transistors, the connection is very complete!!

UTILIZATION

for beginners in multi effects, we better get a smaller model because there are still quite full!! the manual is very well done, it aids stepper! editing sounds is easy if you know the various reactions of his

SOUND QUALITY

effects are very believable, I use a guitar jackson dx10 d, I love everything about this multi effect unless the lamps to be changed (the original lamps are made in china screaming and the sound is very poorly distributed )!!!!

OVERALL OPINION

after a few months of use and change in different lights, I finally found my sound with this zoom! "I tried various multi-effects including gfx 707 which was to begin at the time, I having 3 pedals was available, I like the warmth of the sound settings amperage lamps and transistors, like the lights in. origins that merits a change! report qual price more reasonable than the qualitée seen the beast! I buy it back again and again !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Everything has been said.
Bonus, comes with Cubase LE 4. I have not used yet but it's nice to have it!

UTILIZATION

Taking the setup! At first glance I was like everyone lost! The manual is in French and very well explained. Essential.
After a few hours to tweak right to left I think I have grasped the most simple settings. I come already programmed roughly the sounds I want. So I would say much less difficult than the Pod X3.

SOUND QUALITY

Now what interests us most: THE SOUND!
There are 2 lamps, it seems we must change the original lamps for a better sound ... For my part I have not changed yet and frankly what a pleasant surprise the first time I plugged in my Zoom!
The sound is warm, pleasant, powerful! Really a striking quality .. I can not even imagine if the statements are true. (That sounds better with other lamps ..)
The amp models are mostly successful. (Mention the Metalzone and H & K drive I love this one!)

By clean I have not tested it but too few simus amp is really great, especially Marshall. Moreover claps a lot! There is even a simulator that transcribes and acoustics is a success. The distos are on top. I really think you can get great sound with virtually anything and everything in this photo if you take the time to work a little. However the simulation Fuzz hast not too convinced but it is only my opinion.

The wah is not bad too, especially the Vox. The reverbs are few but they agree .. Only small problem of the lack substain, but this can be added through the effects loop so do not extend to the top.
I played a little of everything and believe me, it's not really difficult to find the sound we need. The factory sounds apart from 4 or 5 does not ring, but give a good starting point and benchmark for hack .. (Required guys!)

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for over a week and What happiness! Before she was on the pod X3 and I can clearly see the difference .. THE zoom is better at any point of view! More heat, less cold and robotic and easiest to fix! Warning I do not spit on the Pod is a great product especially if you work in the studio, but honestly guys this photo is worth a look.
If you hesitate between it and the competition personally I recommend the Zoom G9 2TT! The value for money is unbeatable for me! Try it if you are confirmed. If you're like me at a fairly low level so go there with confidence.
With experience I will ever be that choice without problem. Oh happy that Zoom! (You'll understand that I love madly muli-effects!)

All has already been said

UTILIZATION

relatively simple manual, I got the manual francais.la creature was designed intuitively and if you proceed logically, there will be no problem.

SOUND QUALITY

This is where I wanted to expand a bit more my own sounds commantaire.Les G9.2tt and has an impressive range of sons.Je want (to clarify that I use roland cube on a 30 ...... so far from being a great amp ..... but it sounds as halala ...., use.The sound factory FRO FRO, but when you start grind a little buttons, one takes a shot concience that this investment has not been useless, and also have many hours of pleasure ahead.

OVERALL OPINION

I have been using 2 days and have never used other pedals auparavant.ce I like most is the sound quality and the possibilities open to us to create, the less ,..... ......... no, I really do not see sincèrement.rapport money ..... very very interresting, bought 249 euros TTC shipping available on "sonovente.com. I many informed before you buy and all that I could be read as opinion (and since its release in 2006 (I think)), this pedal to the air of being one of the best on the market ... ... at least to this price range.

YES, it is obvious that I make the election again without hesitation.

Originally written by alex42xx on Audiofanzine FR.

Tube amp simulation. Possibility to edit the patches with a PC with a Midi USB cable.

UTILIZATION

It's my first multi-effects processor and I learned how to use it without having any experience with such equipment:
very easy setup: just connect, press the on/off button and have fun with the factory presets. Editing is very easy: one day was enough for me to edit all presets I need. The manual is very clear except for the part related to the connection to a PC.


SOUND QUALITY

The presets don't sound very good: I used them for two days then I edited all parameters. The editing possibilities are almost endless. I use it with an Ibanez Steve Vai, an all-tube Marshall 30th Anniversary and a Roland Cube60 (the sound is obviously better with the Marshall...). I get very nice distortions with the Marshall and Mesa Boogie simulations. The wah effects sound also very good, especially the Vox and Cry models, which are wonderful.

OVERALL OPINION

I've been using it for three months at home and for band rehearsals and it makes lots of fun (I haven't used it on stage). I love the amp simulations and the editing possibilities. It has the best value for money in this category. I wouldn't hesitate to buy it again.