All user reviews for the Steinberg Cubase SX 2

No problem install level, if not the original version does not work on Panther, don c must be the update and ho surprise, finally walking fawn talk ...

ADQUATION / PERFORMANCE

Mac Ti 1 GHz 1 GB RAM, 60 gigs of HD RME Hammerfall Multiface sound card
The software is full of bugs, the most unbearable is the graphic bug: the windows disappear and rapparaissent whenever they seem
The performance on this machine are very limited compares the perf on an average PC ...
SX2 mac Panther is not optimized for Steinberg after it would be the fault Apple !!! ??? HA ... HA ... HA !!

NOTICE GLOBAL

I bought this software in November or December, and I sincerely believe that I'll sell it to point me to DP4 or logic ...
The price quality ratio is more than bad and still I'm lucky it's an upgrade so I did not pay 800 euros for this bouze.
If I had known that this app was not finished on the Mac, I would have never buy
The least is that Steinberg offers its customers an alternative (eg license limited in time until SX1 SX2 is finished !!!!) or Nuendo a Preferential price, because it seems to be little prs finished !!!

Steinberg Cubase SX2 has been upgraded at this point but I still own it and can provide a good review. At first glance for a newbie it can be a little bit overwhelming if you havent worked with any DAW’s before. Or even if you have worked with other DAW’s you will still need to pull out the manual because everything is a little different than you are probably use to. When installing it on my Dell laptop it gave me no troubles at all and it was a pretty quick installation. All of your basic functions with it like play, record, stop, are right in front of you and easy to find. Its just when you want to get more indepth with some stuff that you will have to learn all of the menus and how to navigate through them. Its not hard at all, you will just have to get use to it and get the feel of Cubase SX2 first.


SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Steinberg Cubase SX2 works great on my system, I don’t think I had any problems with it ever. Everything with it is pretty good with CPU , keeping your CPU down when working with a DAW or music program is crucial because it can make your system start to get a little fuzzy. When I was using SX2 I was using it with a lot of plug ins and even some hardware running in through my Behringer interface. At first I couldn’t figure out how to get all of my midi and stuff set up with the audio. It was a difficult task, even after reading through the manual it still took sometime for me to get it.


OVERALL OPINION

Overall, Cubase has been doing DAWS for years now and they continue to be one of the best on the market. It this is your first time around with Cubase SX2 you could be hooked and wont use any other DAW’s on the market.

Steinberg Cubase SX2 is a sequencer that I have been using off and on for about 6 years or so. There is no particular reason why I havent made it my man sequencer. I guess I am just not as confortable with it as I am some other sequencers that are on the market. Plus at the time when it first came out I was still using a lot of hardware so I never really fully committed to being a Cubase SX2 user. But when I do decide to open up Cubase SX2 is always runs great on my system. I have no problems with it,


SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

I ran it on a 2 gig laptop from Toshiba and it ran great and never froze up or crashed. Even as my laptop got older and couldn’t run some other programs Cubase SX2 still worked like it did the first day that I purchased it. I know a lot of people who choose cubase sx2 over pro tools 7, (or they did at the time). I myself prefer pro tools because every studio uses it. Not every studio has Cubase SX2 on hand.


OVERALL OPINION

Overall, Cu base SX2 has a very good sequencer that is similar to most all the sequencers in most other daw systems. Some of the plus things that I like about Cubase SX2 is the mixer track. I really like the flow of the mixer tracks over any other mixer in softwares. It just works great for me, plus the compression in Cubase SX2 seems to be better than it is in acid pro and fl studio. Cubase’s mixier system with compression and some of the reverbs seem like they model off of Pro tools very closely. Maybe that’s why Cubase is compared to pro tools so much. But I would choose pro tools any day over Cubase SX2. But I still have my SX2 just don’t use it that much anymore.

Easy or hard: since the time I got used to how to Steinberg. Security system just as binding as the updates. More work on this side and on the side prices for the update is far from free ...

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

So there I am happy! More stable and (presumably) less greedy than the version 1.06!
No bugs found in 5 days on a PIV 2.8GHz taf, 1GB DDR400, win XP pro and Delta 66.
Only a few conflicts with cubase old projects (but nothing serious).

OVERALL OPINION

Cubase is like a fine wine, the more it matures more he is good. The new GUI is beautiful (and looks more and more Logic as the new fonctons some essential so you do not understand that they have not thought of it before! (Freeze. ..).
Short but good and unfortunately for our wallets once again indispensable.

Installing the software alone, fastoche. As against the check-in is boring but it's not drink the sea.
No incompatibility with my system.
The manual is in English, is the black dot.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Motherboard Asus A7M266-D, two Athlon MP2200 +, 1 GB RAM, 2 HDD SCSI Ultra 160, Delta 1010 in sound card.
SX 2 works without problem of primary bug, as the opinions prcedent, which should direct their anger at the author version of unofficial ultra bugg like Nuendo 2, rather that Steinberg.
Ergonomics manages a little more and thus more fast gaining. The sound seems more dynamic than the previous version.
Stability in the appointment. Some small problems with importing vst format or the old version but nothing serious trs.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for two days (10 hours above) the interface is quite nice and nothing Drout when Cubase practice long ago. It is rich in tools as mulo and there must be some, however, a tool tip for each tool is for the acclrer habits. The tracks are a rgale of automation and easy management track vst-i greatly facilitated. Only downside for the moment, the instructions in pdf and English.

Setup is extremely "HARD" ... hard drive if you're not a tank + 12 in the area ...
on the other hand midi impossible to read to the banks of my MOTIF RACK (Yamaha) yet correctly configured puuisqu'il works "normally" with its own squenceur SQ1 ...
If qq has an ide ... super welcome ... ke ah yes, yes

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

The interface is intuitive and enjoyable, o saus midi Whereas thickens and becomes a fast trs "casse-head" enough ... Chinese! ! ! and yet it is this which m'intresse because squenceurs audio abound while good "midi" gentlemen bennnnn designers ... not hat ... at all

OVERALL OPINION

Not a destiny "beginners" and I feel in a be (so my rating may be a little STRID), using the ct ... there is still work Mr. Steinberg ... eh ...

.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

.

OVERALL OPINION

Pfffffff it is clear that none of you bought it!

AND everyone can give their opinion on a little soft on it just download emule crack and no matter how ....

I reserve my well being to give an opinion given that I do not have a real version with dongle ...

Users say they have bought all that stability is a copy!

How can you imagine two seconds that put an app on the market that will crash on all the config in less than 5 minutes ?????????

Stop talking nonsense guys ....

Make a real test on a demo version or official .... and after ... allow you to give an opinion ....

Installation made in 5 minutes dbalage understood without problem.
Configuration very simple.
No software compatibility problems and rewire UA1000 immediately recognized.
Manual handling is in French. Trs is clear and easy for beginners to accsmme. He explains through examples the main features. The manual is supplied in PDF Retailer in English, but it's not complicated to understand.
I put 10 because it's really simple to implement ...

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

My PC is low on an ASUS A7N8X motherboard, Athlon 2.5 barton, 2x256 Corsair XMS400 RAM, graphics card GForce 4 Ti 4200 64MB Leadtek, and 80 GB Maxtor drive 8 MB cache, 7200 Tr / m ...
No incompatibility reports.
I have not Russi Exceeds 25% CPU load with Absynth, Kontakt, plugs of 8 different audio tracks Stro 48KHz + 5 MIDI tracks with Reason 2.5 in rewire ...
I have an Edirol UA1000 in sound card, and runs perfectly.

OVERALL OPINION

I have Cubase SX 2 for 1 week, and I do m'arrte more to play with. I do not Russi after planting, even trying
I like it because it's beautiful and enjoyable to use, but also because I always used Cubase since version 3 and XT and VST32 and R5, and SX, etc ...
I agree that the versions antrieures n'taient not conceived for the height of which goes to the audio processing. But now with this new version, bad language have that much to stand, because it's really the height of the top of the market Dtd. I compare Digital Performer, Logic or samplitude no problem. The new audio engine is REALLY suprieur concurence. The limitless possibilities of routing places the height of the best. The possibilities are always twelve o'clock t is strength, and VSTi or Rewire intgration is Steinberg who invented ... For 700 euros available software really gnial with a report qualitprix gal without exception may be the ct Sonar 3 producer who provided more than extensions of apps, but not at Cubase SX2. Sonar may be more suited for someone looking for a product a while with all the effects, synths and virtual sampler Intgr. But necessarily, this is not the height of a Cubase SX2 + Kontakt + Access Virus C. .. They do not apply to same customers I think.
In conclusion, I would do the same choices Obviously, since I am satisfied ...

Installing a relatively simple problem ... by installing Midiman cards (Delta / Midisport) yet Distribus by Steinberg!
Configuration gnrale Sx1.06 close enough.
Complete manual, except for simple things, not reported and found one (export LIBRARY)!

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Pentiuml IV 2.8 (hypertreading). / 1Gig Ram / ABIT IC7 MAX3/Seagate Barracuda 120G SATA / IDE Seagate B.120G.
Delta 44 Midisport M-Audio/Midiman 2x2/Sony BLACK TFT 17 Sdms73
Incredible ... all my projects turned over to the max ... Sx1.06 row, despite the Freeze! Despite the dual processor!
For projects LGERS, obviously not a problem, but to use Reason / Vsti (4ou8) + Audio (8 tracks) + Effects (3!) Or more! Forget!
I work with a professional studio .. and not to waiver SX1.06!
I specify that it is the original version ... DISEZ me that's not true! Steinberg will fix that a!!

OVERALL OPINION

From Atari and Pro24, I have always followed Steinberg (Innovative Audio in) ... and my software is Cubase prfr ... so I use it for 86 (Pro 24).
The best is the logic ... the VSTi / Vst..le worse than a ream dry, and super powerful machines that do not take it!! How far will stop on?
Still I struggled to remain faithful, but these days, no longer pays a lot!
I await an explanation for the management of Hyper Treading (which is apparently not!) In Cubase SX2!

Installation without problem,
For I c incompatibility still not too because I have just the use but I have some anomalies can be seen with V-STATION and REASON but not too bad after day hopes Kelka rglages.
many of us still think cubase is unstable but we think ke cubase nessecite an installation window more than adequate and a sound card perfectly suited for the LOG, (forget all the low-end cards you will get nothing n, c clear !).
Manual in English with the real version, or in french on the net. (Best french for french).

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Config: 2.8 Ghz P4C800 deluxe _ C _ 2 _ * 512 400DDR maxtor 120 giga 8m cache wester digital + 40 giga for SAMPLE _ audio or sound card ADC & DAC 2000 Hoontech _
Software works well with my config from my sound card is cut Defois ki! J play support on the pause button is always on and my reading bar does not move! disgust! but note I do not want to lower the average ca, because I think the prob ke just my card, not cubase, many poor grades give his lies (d in am ) to malfunction and not CUBASE (especially on PC).

OVERALL OPINION

J uses cubase vst since version 32, and cubase SX for the past two weeks,
I love the finish of all! Logic is like, I like too the permanent opening of the console MIDI kan I want my console AUDIO! the MIDI options put forward are too ambiguous for a little novice.
CUBASE is very expensive it pushes a ki in the download to per per (damage).
Cubase and a product for the semi-pro and pro, the use of Cubase SX for beginners is strongly discouraged.

Instalation no problem, no incompatibility, comfiguration trs simple, manual in English a bit boring ......

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

I have a p4 1.8 giga motherboard Gigabyte hard drive scsi p845e 1000 r / min Western digital512 ram sound card creamwre pulsar 2 + a16 + ultra rm converter, and I have no problem rolling nikel even on my big project stud configuration ..... while my motherboard, CPU begins to be on the loose ....

OVERALL OPINION

maintenand was 5 months I use it with an operating system not crack ... and turns to hell! plant it 2 times in 5 months, unwanted with an average of 10 hours per day (except weekends ...) and it works as well or better dp or a logik or ProTool .... and for those who considers that a does not work, think and review your config stop the crack ............. .

The install is as it were the most simplicissima. No incompatibilities with a host of diverse and varied programs of all brands and all Obedia. For the config ', Steinberg (pronounced as in Shtaillenebèrgue Derrick is German) has chosen the professional, so it's best to bring the manual to take full advantage of the wealth of the software. That said if you like me experienced the pangs of noon in Protools you should get out ... The manual is in French generally well done although it is regrettable that the publisher of partition (factory gauze) available only in English.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

PC, Gigabyte 7N400 PRO2, Athlon XP 2600 +, 1GB of RAM, MIA Midi pending Lexicon Omega Studio makes his work with the ASIO drivers in Cubase. FLOW, no latency in midi or audio recording slowed down, but the processor a bit with some plug ins (like the Verb Room M2). 5ms latency in midi audio and virtually zero, happiness. If you walk in XP, the system turns out to be a model of stability!

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 1 year (SX and SX 2). I love the score editor, the combination midi sequencer + partition editor is quite efficient. The program lacks some intuitiveness, again: always have the manual handy! I worked on Protools (audio not great in terrible noon) and Acid or Sound Forge. The advantage of Cubase is that if he did not bénificie the inimitable Protools audio engine that is superior to other products néanmmoins I quoted and, in addition to any self-respecting composer to work with midi a virtual eye on the beats and another on the partoches is simply an absolute luxury! I'm really happy to work with, no complaints.

The same instalation as it does me no problem posse if not than using a PC ddi computer music (not connected to internet) and a PC internet, I ram a little to understand and find ways to allow my usb SX1 (I'm the SX1 to SX2 MJ). But once I realized, I really found trs con not be found more quickly, o) ...
For those who know the dj SX1 config should not pose any problem.
For others, it is all fawn trs not rocket science, and following the manual handling with a minimum of logic should run without lzards ca.
I put only 8 key for this story because I am yet to get used to this kind of manipulation 'I admit to being somewhat schematic explanation of the manual on this level prcis. O)
That said, I think I have most of my t anthousiasme victim blinding; op prss making me too to see the interface, if you know what I mean; o)) So plutt 10 .

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

My PIV 2.4Ghz 1024 MB of DDR2700 and my Hoontech DSP2000 does not move the pieces of BMD (the famous Heaven and Hell, op). Indeed, under SX1, my VST gauge between 10 and 12 or 13, whereas with SX2, ca turn over between 13 and 15, but is it really a matter of consolation or plutt rle r diffrent action of the two gauges?? In short, no loss of life on this one l. The tonnage of SX2 I think all of m ^ m and more prcise Ractive before, but this may be an impression. Still, I have currently no crashes dplorer (6 hours in a row).

OVERALL OPINION

For several hours now, I rejoiced! It is fluid and galres. I rimport SX1 my keyboard shortcuts and I feel at home.
The input channel, the recording level rglage by the INVERTER phase routes because THE Panard SUPRME I tell you ...
A pure happiness.

I LOVE it!

Used with M-Audio Ozone, no problem, configure all took me a minute

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

My Nforce 2 chipset problem wonder usb management, but has nothing to do with the software that runs like clockwork. It is stable and management-vst rewire is perfect

OVERALL OPINION

+ What I like:
Automation fantastic, perfect intgration-vst rewire the audio edition drives (There's he really need a external editor), Interface o All functions are accessible One-click, and discovering all that small small (routing, scores, management rex loops, surround ...).
It's expensive, but it's pro and overkill.
Logic user for years, I can tell you that cubase has nothing to envy the use, it's all the same (when connate with the procedure to import a rotten audio file in logic ... ah if: the reverb might be a little better in logic)
I buy it eyes closed (it would beat me up)

Relatively fast, we can not say that ca be done in 2 minutes but it comes close.
No worries so the cot of the software installation.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

I'm running cubase two BCAN a P4 3Ghz 512 DDRAM, and a 733MHz with 512 also.
It's clear there's no picture! When with one I can rock a ton of VST without any concern, the other shows some weakness when automation are too heavy and the plugs are multiplying on the slopes!
BUT I have acquired the 3ghz there until a few months .. the models went through my old machine and frankly if you did not know better and if it fits comp follow your exact skills may impress!

OVERALL OPINION

For the past 2 years and a half I use cubase to record, mix etc ...
Its ease of use (condition to dive once and for all) is downright enjoyable but I regret a little busted plug ins is so expensive! (But hey we can provide software is also excellent three course ... tons of plugs.)

PRO TOOLS? yes yes I know, I have test, but if your like me and you can not afford to pay you the digi rack to go with, go your way and adopt Cubase!

Hello. j'viens arrived and I scan the forums. I'm working on SX2. actually it has nothing do with the old version. He benefitted from the same engine as Nuendo, and I will say it is even better and less Austr. Asio it with two runs without problem. My e-mu 1820 card is delighted. on the other hand for large mix, I prconise a minimum of 1 gigabyte of RAM, otherwise the link will crak. Bouncer effects, not bad too, it leaves the resource. Finally, for the installation, everyone knows that Steinberg (Pinnacle) is the least boring because no big con manipulation as some apps that shall remain nameless ....
A +

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

ASUS P4 C 800 E DELUXE RAID / 3.2GH P4 / 512 MB RAM / EMU 1820
CUBASE stable? let me laugh! No, it's true they have made efforts. the SX2, although there's no problem days.

OVERALL OPINION

I record everything in 32 bit float is the foot.

I beginners computer music on Cubase VST 32. I then pass SX1 and SX2 (have to do things in order).

Never any trouble during installation. No worries either TC plug-ins.
The manual is clear but my plutt got to play is MODR suddenly, After you install the software and configured my sound card, I go straight into the html help when I ask a question.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

I turned up the software on a config "Gentillet" K7S6, Athlon XP 1600 +, 256 MB RAM (yes, yes, I assure you), 40 GB HDD 7200tr, SB 1024. Everything c'tait because too many more to invest in a new machine.

Against all odds, despite crashing with qq I Accommodation (need not be as demanding with a config has computer music) I qq qd mm Russian Registration cool stuff (my level, I ' mean).

APRS a good year to work on soft Steinberg, I invest DCID DS hardware: Gigabyte 8I915P DUO PRO, P4 530 3GHz, 512MB Corsair, HDD 160 Maxtor SATA 8MB cache 7200tr, and by a couple of days, I order an EMU 1820 (thank you to the AF forum for all opinions found there).

I can not put a bad mark for perf as a given that I was working on a low-end PC. Even when it is not the fault of Cubase.

OVERALL OPINION

I never had the opportunity to use tools such as ProTools and some friends had suggested that Cubase n'tait not very friendly!

Honntement, even though I am far from using all the capabilities of such software must reconnatre VST32 that I have never in terms of grip. The transition SX and SX 2 (despite the change of interface) was done without too much trouble either.

Report qualitprix? In my opinion, it's all good. We have a software pro, stable and friendly enough I got.

BIG problem with the dongle installed on my bike to the point that I have to fight with Steinberg France to install the tool, it's a bad start because without the dongle not soft!

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

My config is powerful enough to do what I have to do, 3000XP athlon 64 bit, 1 Gg of RAM with 5 hard drives X2 80, 120, 160 & 200 Gg (I work a lot) and two sound cards, an Edirol 2496 I could change in some time and a m-audio firewire audiophile!
The software works well after a careful installation, the galley j'escuse hardly suffered for it!
Anyway Cubase is comparable to other programs, it is very powerful and in my case, I use only 40% of its editing capabilities, as I work on Protools and I had bossé on Logic, my choice is listed aussid'un friendly, intuitive and practical, I love working on these 3 Cubase software but still my favorite!

OVERALL OPINION

I work on Cubase long ago, I started with him 88-89 on the Atari 1024 and continues with him, despite some infidelities, via SX2 since January 2004! it's the hair with the config at home!
A rule condition that damn dongle problem, I will repeat that choice!

Linstal no problem very fast explicit
the inconpatibiliter (pr linstan must say no ke jai a PC to dedicate to this program) vs the machine going to believe me a c 500mhz with 512 ram and yes is better but as long as config ke it works (with some difficulty javoue c jarrive a slow but do what I want)
c that the basic config as I used exclusively men pr audio editing (via roland vm 3100) in my group then not very complex
the manual! nan I'm not really a fan of this kind of bedtime reading I bouquinne so I really had other Kan Marash the cheuveux c tt.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Config as I said above lai 500mhz 512 ram 20G dd catre I know its not really say a vr (pc in spare jai gro win a lot c ki me the most beautiful Brel machine right?) on the other hand jai 1catre video screen in two and one agp pci ca tro allows me to not piss me off all my pr get way more small
If it works well? yes pr me that fits me I dont really scouci of perfection but ke koi if I could have better why not!

OVERALL OPINION

It's been two months now I ke Preska PACX with this software (unemployment requires dici hopes to find a little tit job lol but these )<=== conserne mdr ca me
the special ... I would say kan ke su ke jai lon can connect via port twelve one tite Digital vr c ke c ke interesting I think for me c the connecting buses tt (subgroup) on the console little roland vm 3100! it works well (console MX 9000 pr ki want to know them a bus 8)

No problem with the installation.
No incompatibility meeting. Gnrale configuration is easy.
Ct manual is a bit lightweight.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

The app is installed on a Pentium IV with 1.5 Gig 3 Gig of Ram and a map EMU emulator x. It runs perfectly: I can run ten VSTi whose load emulator x 1.2 gig of samples and a dozen audio tracks + many effects without any problem (20% of cpu used !). J'tais far a fan of Logic 5.5 but with my config and Logic, I met a few inexplicable crashes (saturation of the memory (not seen my config), fatal errors ...) d 'o my obligatory passage to another sequencer. So far I did not think could Cubase gallery, see emagiC be better.
But I am royal plant. Whether in terms of stability (10/10) or the ergonomics, I sign for Cubase.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a month and I will not return to E-magic even since the takeover by Apple, was afraid of this ct l.
I prfre is ergonomics: Most paramtres a track are visible from one pannel: we should not spend time double click To create an all-out track. automation tracks trs is clear on this point there is nothing inferior logic.
Treatments such as time stretch audio are better than those of E-magic (prcis faster and, according to prcoute trs useful).
Only regret: the plug-ins for E-magic such as reverbs and delays: on Cubase, it's a little less pro.
Quality / price: even if a 10/10 is a good budget.

Installation is transparent to any user with respect to the protection Steinberg Key, do not hesitate to get the latest version of Syncrosoft at: http://www.syncrosoft.com/Download-78-11.html. This Protection will install the software on as many workstations as necessary, with a single computer used at the same time.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

With the following PC configuration: Motherboard GIGABYTE K8NF9 Ultra / AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200 + / 2GB DDR / 2x 300GB HD 7200T 16MB cache / RME HDSP 9632 sound card / Win XP ...
Outstanding performance and stability, it is a no-fault STEINBERG, with his long experience!

OVERALL OPINION

Used happily for over two years with great FX and VSTi plugins from different vendors, easy to use (ALL manuals in French can be downloaded at: ftp://ftp.steinberg.net/Download/Cubase_SX_2 / Docs_Francais / it is a benchmark for recorder / editor audio / midi; I moved logically to Cubase SX 3.
With - and more - the many tutorials available on the net, forums, and excellent technical support STEINBERG France ... even beginners will quickly find its bearings and to take advantage of the power of the software in its everyday work of creating audio / midi.

Steinberg Cubase SX2 is a solid piece of software. It worked great on my Rain Quad Core computer and never crashed once. I have used Steinberg Cubase SX2 for about a year before leaving to go to Acid. But all Cubase users will tell you that this software is great. When I first started using it was difficult for me because of the layout of the program, but once I picked up the manual and read through a few parts it was really clear to me how to do everything that I needed to know. I used Steinberg Cubase SX2 more for recording, it has a simple workflow for recording and its extremely quick.


SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Steinberg Cubase SX2 is a highly sought after piece of software and its expensive as well. There are a ton of other software's on the market that do the exact same thing as Steinberg Cubase SX2 and cost a lot cheaper. There is nothing special about this software that makes it worth that much more many than other software's.

On things that stands out with Steinberg Cubase SX2 is the power of the mixer and effects. I love the compression and options that come with it. The compression is something that a lot of software's don’t focus on any more. It seemed like Steinberg Cubase SX2 focused a lot on the mixing part of making great sounding music. I really appreciate the fact that you have full control over the compression and and tweak it just right and its quicker and easier in this software than it was in Fl Studio and Acid.


OVERALL OPINION

Overall Steinberg Cubase SX2 is a powerful piece of software, its well worth the money spent if you have the money to spend. I suggest downloading a trial version of it first to see how you like that layout of it and if you can see your self doing production , recording, or mixing with it.