View other reviews for this product:
fabert « good but not great »
Published on 12/18/11 at 05:35I spend the characters, visit korg.
BMOL, not possible to have it recognized in cubase and sonar while the drivers exist, bizarre, and management as with the M3 in cubase as vst.
It is abnormal that today a major manufacturer of such a korg synth without being able to communicate with a Mac or PC.
UTILIZATION
With korg from beginners, delta m1, m3, 05rw, ns5r, Wavestation, MicroX, 2000 ms, triton extreme M3, TR rack, I'm used to the philosophy and sounds korg korg, No surprise. Not open the manual.
SOUNDS
Korg sounds good in normal trs synthesis and acoustic means, my yamaha is suprieurs. It is only evolution of M3, hence my dception on Kronos.
Only advantage the 16 audio tracks
OVERALL OPINION
3 days of intense testing and the habit of synth since 1976. Whereas I though the Roland Fantom G7 suprieur but equivalent to yamaha XF6.
The report quality price is a bit expensive in terms of M3.
I put 7 / 10
BMOL, not possible to have it recognized in cubase and sonar while the drivers exist, bizarre, and management as with the M3 in cubase as vst.
It is abnormal that today a major manufacturer of such a korg synth without being able to communicate with a Mac or PC.
UTILIZATION
With korg from beginners, delta m1, m3, 05rw, ns5r, Wavestation, MicroX, 2000 ms, triton extreme M3, TR rack, I'm used to the philosophy and sounds korg korg, No surprise. Not open the manual.
SOUNDS
Korg sounds good in normal trs synthesis and acoustic means, my yamaha is suprieurs. It is only evolution of M3, hence my dception on Kronos.
Only advantage the 16 audio tracks
OVERALL OPINION
3 days of intense testing and the habit of synth since 1976. Whereas I though the Roland Fantom G7 suprieur but equivalent to yamaha XF6.
The report quality price is a bit expensive in terms of M3.
I put 7 / 10