All user reviews for the Digidesign Digi 002 Rack

Buys records for demos and songs.
I utilsie with a PC and a Mac.
the char are allchantes ... but not everything is so rosy (yeah iben must find defects)
I have set 8-9 but something makes me tilter again, you'll see below

USE

Win xp install gavante, I have had problems DAE of compatiblit ja i install the patch and several times because I avai untimely reset.
mac osx tiger: while being under 6.4, I had to buy the FORCE update 7.0 for power utilsier the beast on osx ca ... short mamis in a supreme state of rage. fast and efficient installation otherwise.

nonexistent manual paper.
should read the pdf or BUY (the 3 times I think)

config is fast and clear
paper manual that is provided is of a total failure, so be ... BUY

IMPLEMENTATION

Drivers rather stable but it is normal for a sequencer did ... well ... anyway I have had problems DAE ...
updated often enough, PAY, so must BUY (5th) and parfoi in updatant your OS, your protools'm not! So no choice but to BUY.
are the MaJ can I find nothing aprticulier to 7.0, if n is a new logo, odds and ends twelve o'clock without immportance and organization of difrente menu, finally foutage of mouth.

track number = 32 on the LE version
latency is 7 to 12 ms here has little pret

the FW400 is really cheap, ca saturates quickly under logic pro (or c is my cpu / hd shitting, but I'm not so sure)

That said tle piotn c es ds mouth, is better now pa ing for her.
protools is direct, effective on the job, and will my reconaissance.
no fuss has cubase, no features, and translation option canister with logic!

NOTICE GLOBAL

J utilsie my 002 for 2 years has little pret

then here is the big worry Hardware:
the PREAMP are simply moldy !!!!
the breath is well presented and pass 3/4 of the knob, BIM! c is the tsunami of breath, the Siberian storm.

been telling a preamp for rec dynamic mic or GTR / bass, c is quite horible

the price quality ratio is not bad, the sequencer is to bcp in my opinion.
with experience, if I wasn inge her, I'll probably see a similar choice what presents. I know that al j esitai era between 002 and RME Fireface.
but hey it are preferable up with working on protools when you're inge his pro OPUR reason.

Purchased to replace an aging Digi 001 through use in my home / project studio. It is connected to a Mac Pro 8-core (second generation) with 12GB of RAM. Recordings are made in ProTools and a dedicated fast disk 1 TB connected internally (SATA). In most cases and for most users, the Digi 002 is fitted satisfactorily and allows recordings of excellent quality without using the additional gear. But for my part I wanted to push the possibilities a little further made especially for "critical" (voice, acoustic instruments), which is why I use external preamps (Focusrite ISA and / or Mindprint Envoice Mk I) better than those fitted to the Digi 002 and above equipped with excellent AD converters and digital output (S / PDIF and ADAT) to avoid the Digi converters which work certainly adequate but not extraordinary. Output I use a Presonus Central Station that allows me to select different plays and juggling different sources, particularly useful to avoid latency when monitoring Digi while shooting.

UTILIZATION

Most of the time my projects are done in ProTools (in order of updates, versions were used PTLE 7.4 PTLE 8.x, and currently PT9HD PT10HD), but I also occasionally used Logic Pro 8 and Ableton Live 8. The drivers I was never posed problems (except perhaps those of the 9HD which were a bit tricky). No worries regarding updates either, except the price asked by Avid extravagant enough to move from 8LE to 9HD (which, remember, was the first version to be able to use the HD without all have dedicated hardware), and then to the 9HD 10HD ...
I did not do any tests to see how many tracks it is possible to reach before the machine is on his knees asking me pardon, because I do not see the interest in my case. My projects often do not exceed 24 tracks 24bits/48KHz (I'm old school), I think the most I can remember is reaching 33 tracks without the slightest concern, so far theoretical possibilities of PT10HD which are 256 tracks in 24bits/48KHz ...
The issue of latency is however the biggest flaw of this interface is not better than other interfaces much cheaper, and for this price you can find better (eg RME). But this is a false problem in my case since I bypass using my Central Station, and it can also be solved if you use a console ... But there is also the "Low Latency Monitoring" ProTools allows to comfortably work with this interface.

GETTING STARTED

Trouble-free installation particular configuration clear, no incompatibility encountered manuals and more comprehensive in scope, you die! We see here that Avid / Digidesign is firmly rooted in the professional market, nothing is left to chance. Flawless on that side ...

OVERALL OPINION

I use my Digi 002 since 2006, before that I used its predecessor, the Digi 001 since 1999! My choice was on these interfaces especially because I was using ProTools studio for several years. So, I have not really tried anything else, since I wanted to use THAT ProTools and it did not turn solely on the interfaces Avid / Digidesign. This problem is more topical today because ProTools is quite capable of running on any interface, whatever its manufacturer. So I'm not sure I would do this choice today, because at the same price, you can find much better! UAD Apollo example or Apogee, RME or a ...

What characteristics have motivated your choice?
Many inputs and outputs on the FW.

For what purpose?
Applying effects Recording.

UTILIZATION

Driver sometimes capricious. The problem is well known (see Forum Avid and others)
Avoid standby.
More updated driver, Avid considers the machine obsolete.
I use 1024 sample latency under 44.1k. is 23.2ms. 50aine a track simultaneously readable.

GETTING STARTED

No problem.
Buttons in facade do not look anything but devilish practice. ie "mono" and "Alt Src to Mon"

OVERALL OPINION

For almost a year.
I had used these machines recording studio with ProTools (I use Ableton Live).
For that price yes. Namely, despite its good quality, this equipment is aging and no longer supported (which is largely lowered its rating). Nine for the price, there are much better now (with many entries, better preamp and DSP).
Namely: MacOS Lion, there is a problem with the driver CoreMIDI over medium noon.

as explained: 4 mics and 4 simultaneous lines.

UTILIZATION

Mega stable - simple.

GETTING STARTED

more than easy! and better than other bcp.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 10 years.
- Converters audio / digital / audio quality questionable.
- The preamps indisputably bad ...

... BUT

- Extensive connectivity and perfectly thought for this price range (there is always a solution with 02).
- 8 inputs - 8 outputs - and finally possibility to buy a preamp later to compensate for the lack of quality of those provided ...

Certainly a Motu is better but I think it is much more expensive 8x8 version that Digi.

Brief often criticized but eventually we see everywhere as very practical.
If you are after a fade its proximity to the preamp wide open ... this is not bueno!

It made me proud to service!

4 mic inputs
4 line inputs
2 ADAT
Monitor output L / R Utilis (Jack)
6 additional outlets in jack
1 MIDI IN, OUT 2 midi
Optical IN and OUT
SPDIF IN and OUT.
Front:
Headphone jack, and headphone monitor volume, gain mic inputs with selectable mic or line level and a low cut.
The level 4 line inputs is not adjustable.

UTILIZATION

Used on mac book, very easy to install, very stable.
Have to play a little on the buffer size according to whether it is or mix rec.
Slight latency with Pro Tools LE (normal considering the price).
For the rest everything is clear, I / O configuration modular Pro Tools.

GETTING STARTED

I'm a bit of a quiche computer but I have managed to install everything without too many problems.
Pay attention to the internal clock if you pair a octo-in ADAT preamp.

OVERALL OPINION

Good machine, does the job.
Integrated preamps are not crazy but considering the price that is normal, that is not there for that.
Very robust, solid metal construction, solid knobs too.
No surprise with this Bécanne if you want to work on Pro Tools with more than 4 inputs I see no better (at the same time I have not tested everything either!).
Coupled with a octopréamp gives 16 inputs and there you can work, save the concert etc, very convenient.

This is the only way to 8 inputs / outputs to run pro tools 8 on a G5 that has motivated my choice, I use an analog console with 16 tracks, and I used to record (voice, bass , guitars, synths, sound effects and mix externally), I use an external preamp, I am not using the internal preamps.

UTILIZATION

I am using the card only for Pro Tools.
Firewire tends to lose the connection with the card, it happened to me only mix at a rate of once per session, I can record 8 tracks simultaneously, and I must have sessions that run over 30 tracks .

GETTING STARTED

Installed without a problem, very simple configuration, and no incompatibilié

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 1 year and a half, I'm working on a Pro Tools HD system at work and DIGI 002 converters that are soft and do not transcribe the feeling that I have taken, I know that the result will not the pitch when shooting, what I like most is the 2 track controls, mute and mono.
Bypassing prémps and converters, this card can only run older versions of Pro Tools.
I would do this choice under the constraint of an old Pro tools ...

I have used both the DigiDesign 002 Rack as well as the actual console model. There are some small differences between the two. Mainly just that the rack doesn’t have the mixing sliders on it (because there is no room) but that doesn’t mean that the 002 Rack isn’t good. The great thing about this interface is that it is affordable, there are not many interfaces that are great with PC or with MAC that run on Fire wire and are made for pro tools. It is like having a real full professional studio right in your house. With the 8 channels that are balanced analog and also 8 of ADAT optical I/O you cant go wrong. On the DigiDesign 002 Rack there are 4 mic preamps with 48V phantom power, there is also some midi ports as well, I cant remember exactly how many there are though but there are well more than the average home musician needs.


UTILIZATION

When you purchase DigiDesign 002 Rack it will come with Pro Tools LE (if I remember correctly). Since this rack is pretty much made for Pro Tools it makes it really easy to configure and to set it up and start using it right away. If you are new to Pro Tools then that’s where the trouble will come in. Pro Tools is not easy to understand right away, it will take some time. But the DigiDesign 002 Rack will cause you no problems setting it up. The latency is almost 0 and the drivers are very stable, I don’t think I have every had any updates for it though. I used it on a Quad Core PC and also with a Mac Book.


GETTING STARTED

The manual isn’t the easiest thing in the world to understand, but you can get through it if you need to use it.


OVERALL OPINION

My favorite thing about the DigiDesign 002 rack is that its like having a major studio right in the privacy of your own home, and it’s a great tool to understand how things will work in the major studio. I do suggest getting the actual 002 Digital Mixing Console (board) over the rack though, it will come in handy later down the road.

I have used the DigiDesign 002 Rack in a few different studio’s and I must say that its amazing! I wish I could have this at my house! Its an amazing audio interface with all of the ins/outs you need to have a powerful session.


UTILIZATION

It seems pretty simple to run, they had it in pro tools in the studio that I was in. I am very familiar with pro tools so it was simple. I am not too sure if you can use it on a different DAW though. Digidesign does create other audio interfaces that can be used on several platforms though. But the whole time we were using it, we had no lag/latency. Well there is no such that as 0 latency , but you would think the DigiDesign 002 Rack had 0 latency with how well it worked! Probably the best interface of I have every worked on. It didn’t crash on us or anything. We had absolutely zero problems with it, for the few hours we were using it.


GETTING STARTED

Getting started with it wasn’t hard at all , as I said before I am really good with pro tools. But with a newbie it could be an issue getting started. But I am sure the manual will clear up any questions or concerns you might have. It does allow you to run several tracks at once, so if you are running this on a mac with a lot of ram you will be good to go! Very powerful tool right here!


OVERALL OPINION

Overall, I say if you can afford this unit buy it now! You probably wont find anything better on the market that can fit in your rack at home. This unit is used in major studios all across the world, and after using it I See why. No complaints at all with this one! Buy it!

Four channels, 24-bit at up to 96kHz sample rate support. Analog, digital, and MIDI capabilities with dedicated monitor and headphone outputs. The unit can supply phantom power if need be.

I ran it into an ancient mac book and used the version of protools that came with it. Worked great.

UTILIZATION

This unit is (i think) discontinued, which means no more driver updates. I had no issues with the unit crashing or freezing, so no updates were needed.

There was some latency, but the unit allows you to directly monitor the signal (with the monitor and headphone outs) which means latency is a moot point.

I never used it with anything besides the version of protools it came with, which worked flawlessly.

It allows you to record 4 tracks simultaneously. I only ever did it with 2. I had no issues what so ever.



GETTING STARTED

The only issue I ever had with it was when it came to MIDI. I tried to use it to program my FCB1010, however the 002 rack wouldn't recognize it. Its was just a compatibility issue between the two units, the MIDI worked fine when it came to anything else.

I never had a need to consult the manual, so I cannot comment.

As for the setup, it was really simple. Simple enough that I did not need the manual.

Everything is clearly laid out and clearly labeled, so its really easy to find and access all the functions.

OVERALL OPINION

Besides the lone MIDI issue there is not much to complain about, the built in mic preamps sound great, its really easy to setup and use, and its runs flawlessly.

I used this unit on lone from a friend, and as great as it is I can't really see paying full price for it. Its an excellent unit, but not $1200 excellent. I'd much rather pickup a Makie onyx board or some other equivalent unit for half that price.

DCID has several things very promptly choose the 002 rack:
- Reliability: I had a DSP2000 for 3 months, it sounded okay, but the glitches taken during the ... my hair has taken a hit! it sounds and it is the reliable +
- Stabilit: A soft, program = less problem, the choice is between tinkering with full of possibilities on paper or have something that works for what is announced in this ca us closer to the philosophy " hardware ", it is reassuring.
- Compatibility asio (2in/2out for now), go, we can just laugh even when ...
- Jobs software bundle with the live / Reason / AmpliTube / SampleTank / DigiRack / eq tracks!! (For the price of a 002 rack, there are full of good stuff too ... naked!)
- Pro tools, even when, the fact that ca ... As we do not have MIDI (this is irreplaceable cubase)
config: clron1.7/ASUS P4PE/512Mo/3 120GB HDD for a total

UTILIZATION

It's going to install itself. Thank you for prvenir when there is a manual trans REFERENCE ProTools LE 6.1, even in PDF m'interresse aussitt ca!

GETTING STARTED

No worries up Submitted, I'm still waiting to reach the limits of Systm ... that will depend on my config, as native PTLE. But that changes when you can Save even without any concern (nothing like a hiccup file for taking the shekel to the ground, is not Mr ca Hoontech?). Latency is exceptional even with a growing but not exagree use of plugs.
As for the audio engine is subjective, but I think overall ar more than the SX (better spatial Stereo), and dynamic.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a month without problem, so I change!

Lectroniciens and hackers of all kinds, choose plutt a Motu 828, 8 outputs that will make your sampler ... Cubase SX is when even more is that PTLE. That said, if your most real machines that virtual synths, you can also mix prferer has pro tools.

Save for those who want a well made dmo without s'nerver while shooting is the best compromise at the time. Well, it is only my opinion ...

For my part I own the non-rack version, and I am fully satisfied, if ct is again it would be now! After all that you use depends on its subject ...

UTILIZATION

Just put the installation CD and everything was going perfectly: just right to be secured to ensure the serial or no resettlement possible!

GETTING STARTED

Drivers very satisfactory, just as we would like to have an asio that takes into account all the features of the table (automation) but for the rack version is irrelevant

OVERALL OPINION

Use since November
0 crash
even if the price is a bit high frankly worth the blow given the reliability of the product

See digidesign sit,
I use with the Alesis AI-3 and a Mackie 32/8/2

UTILIZATION

No problem for installation is just a guide to let it work alone, no pb with acid, no crash yet

GETTING STARTED

Very easy to use even for a beginner are simple functions

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for three months, I have an earlier and much DSP2000 tell you guys that there is a world between my dsp deux.Avec I were always obliged to retoucher.La it works alone.
The sound is very clear and well defined.
Only downside, lack of plugin, enough for my taste compared to VST.
But in a studio, pro tools becomes essential.
best choice on the market today in this price range

Used with a PowerBook G4 1.5 GHz. A REGAL installation use. I wanted an impeccable sound card and so far, it fills all my expectations (I bought it a month ago and she keeps walking). Right now (September 2004) is found from new 1100, but by running the competition, we can have it for 1050 (I took the test). Made 50, but will not do without!

UTILIZATION

Installation without problems, no conflict, handling and use of a childish simplicity

GETTING STARTED

Protools 6.2.2 book (it works with the fire of God)
BUT not enough plug-ins and it's really dcevant (but for the price ...)

OVERALL OPINION

I can only recommend this great sound card. I had a DSP2000 before .... if you want the terrace of the winery of the Montparnasse tower, buy this machine!
I use it for recording voice, scratches, synth analogigues, and string instruments. I am not yet totally fun with the beast, but I can tell you that a 4-track recording and 24-bit 96KHz him no problem (the song silent jou live there and the session lasts 8min30 a last 2:30)
Report qualitprix the advantage of acqureur
If I had to make another choice, I immediately buy the digirack002. But this is not a board; dpend all of what you want to; suohaitez you continue to eat and sleep set hours? If you are always behind the base, do not buy this sound card .... Your friends, friends, and parents do not forgive anything. A word!

I do not score 10 for gnerale because the number of plug-ins is disappointing.
For personal info, I know the reasons Bombois to put that machine 3 medium. Can he tell me? In advance, thank you.

A good asset: 4 pramps microphones, in 10 lines, 10 lines out (+ adat)
Config: Mac G4 dual processor running OS 10.3.2 2 x867

UTILIZATION

- Installation fastoche. We put the CD, one connects, it is an update internet ...
- ATTENTION with the wanadoo modem FAST800 from home!
I 0 crash if I unplug my modem to boot the computer against 5 per night if I leave it plugged!
- The manual comes in pdf ... like 800 pages in English :-( print self-same, but hey, the use is instinctive enough to do without if it contains the English vocabulary is quite easy to read even when.

GETTING STARTED

- Zero-latency mode in the software
- 26 tracks with 30 plug-in 24 bit 44.1 khz, and still running ... Reason without derrire. Reason in the background is resource intensive. So I import audio mixes in Reason in Pro-tools if I need a lot of runs.

OVERALL OPINION

- Use the past year.
- What is enjoyable pro-tools!
- The pramps are good, it's stable, pro, the interface is enjoyable, a hardware price of a quality "almost available" ...
and when we see qu'oin finds Used now! too cool!