View other reviews for this product:
phger « Superb »
Published on 10/31/10 at 06:48See manual configuration
UTILIZATION
ultra simple in Cubase Essential 4. First start: takes a small 1 / 2 hour to start with the OS (download from Access). After starting a small 1 / 2 hour for an update of the tracks in cubase.
I have connected the virus and the Midi USB interface with a USB-MIDI UM2G of Cakewalk (where y 'auusi my Korg Triton). I prefer to have the virus live on my console using midi tracks in cubase (via USB: loss of fishing, but he seems good with bare fingers, a good set that does not include). 'm A bit old school, so for me config TRITON + MIDI + + RM1X POLY61 and some VST plugins: the top.
In addition, to select your SHARES (1-16) y 'has a direct button on the virus, choose the correct patch and choose the corresponding MIDI channel on cubase is a simple as that there's no need USB. Except for programming the arpeggiator.
Editing sounds: top.
SOUNDS
Then, honestly, I'm still not. It's been awhile since I tried it (24 years in the synth). The reason I found my happiness now is that I dared not put the budget. So for years I tried some stuff maxi 200-600 Euro and always been disappointed and I sold within three months. QYes I know I speak? I had Korg X3, JP8000 (cold), AN1X (best VA in low budget), JUNO60, Korg MS10, Yamaha CS5, Alesis Micron, Roland XP10, Roland SH32 (sold after 1 week ....). The one I have left is the faithful and TRIOTN Poly61 and RM1X (for more than 900 phrases that I route my MIDI synths that I use as BAR)
. All intruments were nice, but coming out of the Virus TI is simply amazing! Even in the TRITON become pale. See if
OVERALL OPINION
above models already had.
Yes I would do without hesitation that choice.
The feature is the simplicity of tweaking sounds, MIDI implementation
UTILIZATION
ultra simple in Cubase Essential 4. First start: takes a small 1 / 2 hour to start with the OS (download from Access). After starting a small 1 / 2 hour for an update of the tracks in cubase.
I have connected the virus and the Midi USB interface with a USB-MIDI UM2G of Cakewalk (where y 'auusi my Korg Triton). I prefer to have the virus live on my console using midi tracks in cubase (via USB: loss of fishing, but he seems good with bare fingers, a good set that does not include). 'm A bit old school, so for me config TRITON + MIDI + + RM1X POLY61 and some VST plugins: the top.
In addition, to select your SHARES (1-16) y 'has a direct button on the virus, choose the correct patch and choose the corresponding MIDI channel on cubase is a simple as that there's no need USB. Except for programming the arpeggiator.
Editing sounds: top.
SOUNDS
Then, honestly, I'm still not. It's been awhile since I tried it (24 years in the synth). The reason I found my happiness now is that I dared not put the budget. So for years I tried some stuff maxi 200-600 Euro and always been disappointed and I sold within three months. QYes I know I speak? I had Korg X3, JP8000 (cold), AN1X (best VA in low budget), JUNO60, Korg MS10, Yamaha CS5, Alesis Micron, Roland XP10, Roland SH32 (sold after 1 week ....). The one I have left is the faithful and TRIOTN Poly61 and RM1X (for more than 900 phrases that I route my MIDI synths that I use as BAR)
. All intruments were nice, but coming out of the Virus TI is simply amazing! Even in the TRITON become pale. See if
OVERALL OPINION
above models already had.
Yes I would do without hesitation that choice.
The feature is the simplicity of tweaking sounds, MIDI implementation