Become a member
Become a member

or
Continue with Google
Log in
Log in

or
Log in using a Google account
Add this product to
  • Mon ancien matos
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Tascam US-122L
Images
1/94

All user reviews for the Tascam US-122L

Filter
Keywords
Average Score:
( 3.4/5 based on 23 reviews )
8 reviews
35 %
2 reviews
9 %
5 reviews
22 %
1 review
4 %
5 reviews
22 %
Write a user review
Value For Money : Excellent
Users reviews
  • Anonymous

    Tascam US-122LPublished on 03/29/12 at 06:45
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Use PC .... ableton, fl, soudforge, .... a skyscraper in Cygnus (rather rare)

    USE

    Easy to install, but a small annoyance, you must disconnect the cable from the PC after install (when the progress bar is at the bottom if I remember correctly) otherwise it's a juqu'à st glin glin;) ( the install will not be finished).

    IMPLEMENTATION

    this is my first card.
    MIDI files have motivated my choice.

    I can not compare, but I find acceptable.
  • Pjones9Pjones9

    Good quality for the cost, great for demos!

    Tascam US-122LPublished on 07/18/14 at 09:22
    I bought the Tascam US-122 looking for an affordable audio interface to record demos of my songs, and I wasn't disappointed! Since it's powered via USB, it's very useful for anyone who works on a laptop, light and portable.
    It has two phantom-powered mic inputs and two line-level inputs, so if what you need is to record a single source or a guitar and a microphone the US-122 will get the job done.


    UTILIZATION

    I work on Logic Pro mostly, and I did find some issues regarding the interface's compatibility. I had to download the drivers and although they were compatible with Apple Core Audio sometimes the software would not recognize the US-122 so I had to unplug it and set up ag…
    Read more
    I bought the Tascam US-122 looking for an affordable audio interface to record demos of my songs, and I wasn't disappointed! Since it's powered via USB, it's very useful for anyone who works on a laptop, light and portable.
    It has two phantom-powered mic inputs and two line-level inputs, so if what you need is to record a single source or a guitar and a microphone the US-122 will get the job done.


    UTILIZATION

    I work on Logic Pro mostly, and I did find some issues regarding the interface's compatibility. I had to download the drivers and although they were compatible with Apple Core Audio sometimes the software would not recognize the US-122 so I had to unplug it and set up again, but that would fix the problem most of the time. Also I had some minor latency issues, however as I said before, those were probably happening because of the lack of compatibility with the software I used.

    GETTING STARTED

    The configuration is very simple, after the installation you can start recording right away. All the typical functions are at hand. I stated above some of the compatibility issues that I had with the Tascam US-122.

    OVERALL OPINION

    This was the first audio interface I bought. Since at the time what I wanted from this audio interface was just recording demos, I found it very useful for that purpose and I'm happy with the work I did with it; however if you want to do audio work that requires great quality this would not be my choice. The Tascam US-122 is great for beginners, mobile recording systems and hobbyist musicians, etc. I still believe that it is a great interface to begin with. It's easy to use and affordable. But if you are serious about producing music with professional audio quality you should consider upgrading.
    See less
  • YoucasteY productionYoucasteY production

    Really for beginners! Provide a good hardware configuration.

    Tascam US-122LPublished on 09/12/12 at 19:52
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I'd buy this little machine to get lower latency and also to discover at the time, recording with a microphone.

    It also motivated me was the connection by USB, all digital anything, something that would make my job easier and with less breath.

    UTILIZATION

    The installation went without problems for me, although I have seemed long.
    Regarding updates to drivers in 3 years I do not see any change.

    Now move on to the problem:

    Since my purchase I run the install and try it directly and big crunches big surprise or even audio processor overhead.
    I stay calm, change hard disk with Windows brand new
    reinstall everything.
    The I a little better, but pushing the lowest laten…
    Read more
    I'd buy this little machine to get lower latency and also to discover at the time, recording with a microphone.

    It also motivated me was the connection by USB, all digital anything, something that would make my job easier and with less breath.

    UTILIZATION

    The installation went without problems for me, although I have seemed long.
    Regarding updates to drivers in 3 years I do not see any change.

    Now move on to the problem:

    Since my purchase I run the install and try it directly and big crunches big surprise or even audio processor overhead.
    I stay calm, change hard disk with Windows brand new
    reinstall everything.
    The I a little better, but pushing the lowest latency, you can not go below 256 ms without big cracks.
    I must content myself with a 512 ms 1024 ms project lean and with a more consistent.
    Result to make a recording with a guitar amp simulator must not only activate it with just a metronome to stall and play with better latency.
    For me it was doable but a colleague with whom I started producing it has been more difficult.
    In addition I changed my computer from a small Asus with whom I can walk when I'm not in the studio and compose the tascam Well I am no longer of any use, I said, I can with the sound card in my computer to get a latency up to 256 ms, whereas with the tascam 512ms is already finished for him.
    I think I must still be a big setup in order to enjoy a decent latency.

    Another test:
    My ear and my equipment is evolved from my years of practice and it is that I wanted to use the tascam to record a music concert Reunion.
    Basically I made up all my equipment balances all the settings, and then I plug one of the dual outputs of the mixer to the XLR inputs tascam
    and I understand the quality of the preamps and converters, big loss of low frequencies, heat well attenuated but not breathing why he is doing well.
    The headphone output is a bad quality that it also pushes the gain, treble distorted coming for you gun down the ear.

    GETTING STARTED

    I returned to the driver of this sound card is not really "adjustable"
    On to the choice between 1024 512 256 128 96 ms if I'm not mistaken on the latter.
    So you'll understand if problm in low latency bin you switch to a large latency.

    OVERALL OPINION

    Used for more than 3 years he has rendered great service and allowed me to record my own Compos guitar and started producing other artists.
    For the beginning I thought it was great because it there's still quality but to experience it the more you realize what was in his hands.
    I do not have that choice again if I had to leave such a product there must be much better.
    However, it is highly portable and self-powered so it can be used in full secondhand.
    I added that was sold with Cubase 4 so it was a small matter anyway.
    See less
  • MGR/ShackManMGR/ShackMan

    Tascam US-122L USB 2.0 Interface

    Tascam US-122LPublished on 05/13/10 at 15:00
    It's the power behind my home studio right now, which isn't that much, but it's a solid Cubase setup that gets my tracks from 'Point A' to 'Done.' I've been using this for a few years now and I doubt it has a scratch on it. Solid metal grey chassis with plastic bumpers. It's really ruggedly built and rather hefty for it's size. I do sound effect recordings and samplings for various plays, musicals, movies as well as the usual full band recordings.

    I needed a cheap way to record. This came with a copy of Cubase LE for less than $100 from Pianos 'n' Stuff in Blawnox, PA, and it's been all I really need since.

    <a href="https://www.nstuffmusic.com">https://www.nstuffmusic.com</a>

    I thin…
    Read more
    It's the power behind my home studio right now, which isn't that much, but it's a solid Cubase setup that gets my tracks from 'Point A' to 'Done.' I've been using this for a few years now and I doubt it has a scratch on it. Solid metal grey chassis with plastic bumpers. It's really ruggedly built and rather hefty for it's size. I do sound effect recordings and samplings for various plays, musicals, movies as well as the usual full band recordings.

    I needed a cheap way to record. This came with a copy of Cubase LE for less than $100 from Pianos 'n' Stuff in Blawnox, PA, and it's been all I really need since.

    <a href="https://www.nstuffmusic.com">https://www.nstuffmusic.com</a>

    I think it's an absolute bargain for a two track recorder. It'll process MIDI, RCA, two mics or a single direct guitar/instrument at a time. I can layer them afterward in Cubase to do a whole band direct. For the combination off software and the features of the unit, I don't think there's a better cheap setup out there, and it's USB 2.0, so there really isn't any chance of latency. It's also powered by that USB cable, so there's really only one wire you need to mess with to your PC. 24-bit, 96kHz quality keeps the music clear and clean, too. And if I ever need more tracks, I can simply go out and get an un-powered mixing board and run it into the two front inputs of the unit.

    I just sat here for about 10 minutes and tried to think of something. I guess I'd like it more if it made orange juice, too. equals)

    As I said earlier, it's all-out steel and heavy duty plastic construction. Mine doesn't have a scratch on it, mostly because I've taken care of it, but it seems to be pretty darn rugged. None of the connections have ever seemed flimsy or in any way loose, and I've never had reason to suspect a problem with the unit.

    It's an absolute best buy. It gets my award for best budget product and best entry level product for recording interfaces hands down. The US-122mkII is really just the same thing in a new color with slightly better hardware. Either one will keep you happy for a long time.

    This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com
    See less
  • MGR/Derek MokMGR/Derek Mok

    Tascam US-122 USB Audio/MIDI Interface

    Tascam US-122LPublished on 01/19/05 at 15:00
    I bought this unit at Guitar Center in Hollywood for $199. I needed a means to input audio into my computer for film work.

    Solidly built, simple interface, good input options. Attractive in appearance -- so it looks good beside your computer. My computer setup doesn't have space for a full-sized mixer, so the compact size of this unit is a major plus.

    When I first acquired it, the US-122 was guaranteed to work with Macintosh computers. It didn't -- at least, not for awhile. Tascam tech support responded quite promptly, to its credit, but I had to download a new driver from their website several months after the purchase, and then suddenly the unit started working. Now it does a fine…
    Read more
    I bought this unit at Guitar Center in Hollywood for $199. I needed a means to input audio into my computer for film work.

    Solidly built, simple interface, good input options. Attractive in appearance -- so it looks good beside your computer. My computer setup doesn't have space for a full-sized mixer, so the compact size of this unit is a major plus.

    When I first acquired it, the US-122 was guaranteed to work with Macintosh computers. It didn't -- at least, not for awhile. Tascam tech support responded quite promptly, to its credit, but I had to download a new driver from their website several months after the purchase, and then suddenly the unit started working. Now it does a fine job, but I felt I shouldn't have had to go through the hassle. Most of the bonus software that comes with the box (Cubasis, GigaStudio 24) couldn't be installed on my Mac G5. Finally, you obviously don't get the number of channels as on a real mixer -- it's not what this thing was designed for.

    Looks and feels very well built. The metal chassis feels like it can withstand a beating, even though it shouldn' t have to.

    The driver problem is what I had been really concerned about. Looking back, I think I might have been better off spending double the money and getting the Digidesign Mbox bundle, which is tried and true with Mac-based film-production systems. Still, after some hassle, this unit now does work with my computer and is doing its job, so at least I'm finally getting my money's worth.

    This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com
    See less
  • cedricfourn-78cedricfourn-78

    Do not buy

    Tascam US-122LPublished on 04/13/12 at 05:06
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    On board of a seller for the price.
    Use voice recording.

    UTILIZATION

    The utisation is simple I never had any problems, use with Cubase.
    No worries at latency.
    Regarding the number of tracks that can simultaneously record, no idea, knowing that I recorded the voice.
    I do not remember against by having an update?

    GETTING STARTED

    The installation, no problems, and configuration is fairly simple.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I used it for 2 years, it was my first audio interface for the price and therefore I did not hesitate.
    To start it's not bad, and again.
    It can quickly be totally discouraged by the preamps that are really poor. It blows, occasionally crackli…
    Read more
    On board of a seller for the price.
    Use voice recording.

    UTILIZATION

    The utisation is simple I never had any problems, use with Cubase.
    No worries at latency.
    Regarding the number of tracks that can simultaneously record, no idea, knowing that I recorded the voice.
    I do not remember against by having an update?

    GETTING STARTED

    The installation, no problems, and configuration is fairly simple.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I used it for 2 years, it was my first audio interface for the price and therefore I did not hesitate.
    To start it's not bad, and again.
    It can quickly be totally discouraged by the preamps that are really poor. It blows, occasionally crackling.
    I think you can do better but much better at the same price (maybe slightly more).
    I recommend to summarize, even for beginners.
    For example, my record was better with a sound blaster audigy, a small mixer, and an SM58.
    See less
  • Anonymous

    good

    Tascam US-122LPublished on 03/29/12 at 06:46
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    PC use .... ableton, soundforge, .... a little scratching at the Cygnus (rather rare)

    UTILIZATION

    Easy to install, but a small annoyance, disconnect the cable from the PC after the install (when the progress bar is at the bottom if I remember correctly) if it has the st juqu'a glin glin ;) ( the install did not finish).

    GETTING STARTED

    this is my first map.
    The MIDI files have motivated my choice.

    I can not compare, but I find acceptable.
  • Titris06Titris06

    Dcevant

    Tascam US-122LPublished on 12/15/11 at 11:42
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    - What technical specifications motivated your choice?
    I bought in a shop in central Brussels on the "advice" from a vendor. The motivation for the purchase price mostly silent

    - For what purpose?
    Home recording studio with computer music

    - Config
    I used it on multiple computers, the latency silent identical in all cases.
    Computers taient quips the latest firmware from windows 7 and I always used Cubase (3, 4 and now 5) pro versions.

    -Uses
    I use a sm57 regarding guitar amp and wind instruments, sm58 for voice, and I use the DI my bass amp for bass pramplis because of the sound card is really bad quality .
    So all through the XLR, I also use the afternoon to an electronic…
    Read more
    - What technical specifications motivated your choice?
    I bought in a shop in central Brussels on the "advice" from a vendor. The motivation for the purchase price mostly silent

    - For what purpose?
    Home recording studio with computer music

    - Config
    I used it on multiple computers, the latency silent identical in all cases.
    Computers taient quips the latest firmware from windows 7 and I always used Cubase (3, 4 and now 5) pro versions.

    -Uses
    I use a sm57 regarding guitar amp and wind instruments, sm58 for voice, and I use the DI my bass amp for bass pramplis because of the sound card is really bad quality .
    So all through the XLR, I also use the afternoon to an electronic keyboard or a battery

    UTILIZATION

    -Drivers
    They are relatively stable, I had a few crashes dj but it's really not a problem rcurent.

    MAJ-
    There is actually an update from time to time

    Latency-
    (Max 14ms, min: 3.90 ms; normal: 4.85 ms) Correct but does not allow monitoring of the recess ...

    -Software
    Trs mostly Cubase as said above

    -Number of tracks
    It is possible to record a power trio with no voice, the bass guitar a cot on the other, and by noon the battery using a battery electronic

    GETTING STARTED

    -Installation
    No problem with installation

    -Configuration
    The configuration is fairly simple, the buttons all have a clear purpose. As against the ergonomics leave a little catch DSIR are not very easy accder depending on the position of the device.

    Compatibilitbr-/> I do not remember incompatibility

    -Manuel
    The manual is not really as ncessaire given the simplicity of the device

    OVERALL OPINION

    I have now for over 4 years, I found the beginners trs well, I also beginners in home recording studio. J'tais trs satisfied with the product.
    But now looking back I realize that pramplis are a fool quality of output is likely to grill (no longer functioning) (output "line out") which is quite problmatique.
    Entries begin grsiller now I'm going to change by trs soon as this sound card does enough for me and for my use over 2 inputs is not enough ...

    -Report qualitprix
    I will not say it is bad but not good either, there are ways to beat for the same price.
    With the exprience, I think I turned to something else, and I would take something directly from just over onreux.
    See less
  • s-ailleurss-ailleurs

    Tascam US-122LPublished on 05/27/07 at 02:47
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I had bought to make mock of voice on Final Cut Pro, but it s'avre estincompatible with the software. ( )

    UTILIZATION

    Installation ease.
    Incompatibility with Final Cut Pro & Soundtrack Pro.
    Unable to configure 16-bit for the video: 24 bits only available.

    GETTING STARTED

    Upon activation of the power fantme, there have been crashes and disables the card USB2 port to which it silent branch (direct port, no hub).

    OVERALL OPINION

    Back to the store. Not for my use.
  • vanpetvanpet

    Tascam US-122LPublished on 09/07/07 at 09:13
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    EDIT: works on Vista since September 2007!

    Everything works well, the latency is improved, I can play guitar amplified by AmpliTube live without apparent delay, same with my MIDI instruments. Nickel.

    A "bug" is that between XLR and Jack share the same channel, we must choose, and sometimes it's boring (synth Stereo, hop the two inputs are taken)

    UTILIZATION

    Vista drivers work well trs, installation is clear and easy. The manual is clear.

    GETTING STARTED

    The drivers put more n'taient day long, it took a little squeezing Tascam deign to leave the Vista version, but since it's done, I have nothing to say that ct l.

    I use this card with Cubase LE (bundled with, gr…
    Read more
    EDIT: works on Vista since September 2007!

    Everything works well, the latency is improved, I can play guitar amplified by AmpliTube live without apparent delay, same with my MIDI instruments. Nickel.

    A "bug" is that between XLR and Jack share the same channel, we must choose, and sometimes it's boring (synth Stereo, hop the two inputs are taken)

    UTILIZATION

    Vista drivers work well trs, installation is clear and easy. The manual is clear.

    GETTING STARTED

    The drivers put more n'taient day long, it took a little squeezing Tascam deign to leave the Vista version, but since it's done, I have nothing to say that ct l.

    I use this card with Cubase LE (bundled with, great!), And they go well together trs, good average latency (between 5 and 10 ms) as appropriate.

    It's two mono tracks, or up to a stereo. Guitar + voice that's enough.

    OVERALL OPINION

    Buy 160 euros, this card is a good deal, I think. I use it for 4 months to replace a Sound Blaster somewhat limit the entries (no XLR, a single jack). The Sound Blaster Audigy 1 cost me 100 euros discount for 60 euros more I have a faster card, with more IO, USB and supplies for my laptop. Everything is bathed.

    With exprience, I would choose this or another card of the same template, I guess they are worth. This is the entry level there is nothing special. It works, that's what I asked!

    8 / 10 score. For 60 euros less, c'tait 10/10!
    See less
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.