Behringer Xenyx 1622FX
+

Behringer Xenyx 1622FX

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Pin it
  • Submit

Xenyx 1622FX, Analog Mixer from Behringer in the Xenyx series.


4 user reviews

Behringer Xenyx 1622FX tech. sheet

  • Manufacturer:Behringer
  • Model:Xenyx 1622FX
  • Series:Xenyx
  • Category:Analog Mixers
  • Added in our database on: 01/20/2006

We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed

Fill in the product description

»

Behringer Xenyx 1622FX user reviews

VvSurLeRiddim07/08/2013

VvSurLeRiddim's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Cheap, but poor ..."

Behringer Xenyx 1622FX
- Is the rack?
Yes, by screwing the two supplied brackets.

- How many lanes, bus attendant, departures, returns ...)?
* 4 slices mono (with mic preamps)
* 4 stereo channels (line level, without preamp)
* 2 AUX bus with each one start and two returns
* 2 subgroups

- What is the type of connectors (RCA, Jack, XLR ...)?
Everything is Jack, except four microphone inputs (XLR) inputs and 2 / CD / REC (RCA) outputs.

- The parametric equalizer is it?
Medium band semi-parametric (standard on this type of small mixers).


- The effects section is it integrated?
Yes. Digital multi-effect (classic effects: reverb, delay, flanger etc ...) applicable to the bus.

- For digital consoles ...: What type of sync are supported? ...
The console is analog, no sync.

- What is the accuracy of the sampling (bits / kHz)?
The console itself is analog.
However, in my case, it did come with a USB to connect it to a computer audio interface. (UCA 200, cf. My product reviews).
In fact it is quite simply a USB soundcard with 2 RCA (left and right) inputs and 2 RCA outputs (ditto).
Memory, it seems to me that this interface could go juqu'en 48KHz/16 bit, but verify.

CAUTION: The USB interface allows only record / play 2 tracks (= one stereo channel), do not expect to record multitrack with vortre computer!

- Automation is supported?
Not.

UTILIZATION

- The general configuration is it simple?
Yes.

- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
Yes.

- The usual functions are they easily accessible?
Yes.

It is a small mixer, the features are very classic, RAS on this side here.

SOUNDS

- The console is transparent?
It is especially bad. I do not know if we can speak of "color" in this case ...
The preamps are really bad. The sound is dull without dynamic and insufficient reserve gain. I happened to have to plug in multiple microphones with an output level a little low, impossible to leave anything of drinking in these conditions.

- The equalizer is effective? ...
No, no interest except to rot a little more sound.

- Introduced she breath?
A little. It is acceptable for the live at the MJC the corner if you're not too demanding, but it is unacceptable to make home studio recording.

- I would add a word about the integrated effects. They are fitting with the rest: cardboard, cheap, just use if you are not too demanding.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
I no longer use it for 2 years & 1/2: I have since been replaced by a small Soundcraft not much more expensive, but much better, it's night and day.
I had used for four years anyway.

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
No, it was almost my first mixer. Conaissant there anything at the time I bought it mainly for its features on paper, and unbeatable price (with time I understood why).

- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
* Least: its rotten
* Most: I'm still looking ... I am tempted to say the price but in fact not see that the money is fucked up

- How would you rate the quality / price?
Unattractive. Although it is cheap, but when we grew up a bit and we realize the invalidity of that stuff, the need for change will be felt sooner or later, and the resale of secondhand, it must not have a very good rating, so it is generally a bad operation.

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
NO!
»
07/08/2013

Anonymous 's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" enough passion for home"

Behringer Xenyx 1622FX
everything already said

UTILIZATION

Simple configuration for who knows the principle of buses,, send .....

SOUNDS

Sound nor bad nor good, for the price it does its job of home studio, breath that sounds at high speed,

OVERALL OPINION

I have 4 years, I've tried before pro eurorack of the same brand
I like the price, reliable knobs not as bad as some claim to the
satisfactory value for money for home prices
with time I redo this choice without hesitation
Must not break! without reason, have remained objective is the stuff for hobbyist musician, not for the pros on tour or to complete an album!
budget or relaxation music only passion is a good compromise
avoid buying secondhand without trying all the knobs
6.5 headphone jack that some crachouille
»
Zeknas12/23/2011

Zeknas's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Behringer Xenyx 1622FX
Table 16 analog channels
Complte connection, I chose for these sub-groups that allow me to have a single table in / out of the PC
No automated.
Intgr effect processor.
It comes with a USB audio interface

UTILIZATION

Use very easy.

SOUNDS

No breath.
Effective corrections: graph for serious and acute, paramtrique for mdiums
The effects are pretty average against (my BOSS SE-50 + 20 years is better!)

OVERALL OPINION

For that I use (home studio), I am satisfied.
It is well built, reliable (ending for 3 years of trouble-free), and cheap.
Report quality price trs satisfactory. Behringer products are often dcris, this is not always fair.
I no longer use the USB audio interface (sound card Submitted frquence of a Sampling suprieure well) and it saturates quickly if you ask him too ...
»
scope10/20/2006

scope's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Behringer Xenyx 1622FX
It is the rackmount brackets to put in 19 are provided
For specifications see in behringer
the equalizer is set to mono channels
there are 99 effects presets (24 bits) that are not transcendent but troubleshoot very well if we know the dose.

UTILIZATION

I will do the very short and general answer yes because this table is "very standard" after all

SOUNDS

I will not continue the debate behringer and breath I have not a huge experience for mixers but I would say that the Onyx series is still in it at this level compared to other gn rations.
if the rule like a pig so there is breath (also like a little all the tables not?) no seriously I did not notice a huge embarrassing!
I find the equalizer effective (I use it as a table to work on live) with the synths ordis

OVERALL OPINION

It's going to be one month
for the price it's a great product and especially full
as: routing functions
the least: the space between some knobs (but well done I would need a table dj lol lol)
the quality-price ratio is excellent yes
yes and no because I'm going to sell it because I have to spend a dj mix but otherwise yes I redeemed
»

Behringer Xenyx 1622FX images

  • Behringer Xenyx 1622FX
  • Behringer Xenyx 1622FX
  • Behringer Xenyx 1622FX
  • Behringer Xenyx 1622FX

Discover other products!

Other names: xenyx1622fx, xenyx 1622 fx, xenyx1622 fx, 1622fx, 1622 fx, 1622FX, 1622 FX

Cookies help us improve performance, enhance user experience and deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more.