All user reviews for the PreSonus Studio One Professional
Presonus Studio One Software Review - Presonus Studio One: Crystal Studio
Fed up with Cubase? Sick of Logic? Bored by Sonar? PreSonus will take back your software in exchange for Studio One. But, is it really worth it?
Mcjs's review"Usability, usability"
Rarely overloaded; X79 PC I7-3820, 32Gb RAM, 480 Gb SSD and six 1T HDDs; CG GTX580 and GT610, 4 Full HD displays. Interface: It depends, but mainly a Steinberg UR28 due to the possibility to toggle between different monitors. It has never crashed.
It must be 5 years since I use it and follow the product. I used to use Protools and have Live 9 Suite, too (after having Live 8, etc.). This is my reference DAW, even if I have several programs to work with on the projects I get from other studios. I'm nevertheless thinking about buying PT11 and Cubase 7 for compatibility reasons. PT because I'm used to it and it's the software I work the fastest with. I'll still follow Presonus products, even if I'm not a big fan of the hardware. Studio one is super intuitive, practical, easy, and fast User manual? Does it have one? Oh, well... I've never read it. There's no need to. For me, the first criterion to choose gear is that there's no need to read the manual. With S1 it was love at first sight, from the first versions. A small drawback: The controllers and MIDI pianos. They could do better in this respect. It seems they've had a developer or a whole department on leave since 2007. Another small drawback that has always been a hurdle: The 64-bit versions accept only 64-bit plug-ins. Fortunately, almost everybody has made the jump, but I still have to bridge some 32-bit plug-ins, which I don't want to do without (the compulsory Sonar patches, for example)
Bugenzo's review"Awesome and very intuitive!"
PC, I7 processor, 8G ram, MOTU 896 MK3
I've had studio one for two years now. I currently have studio one 2.5 Pro.
I find this DAW very intuitive with a perfect drag-and-drop operation.
Everything can be done really fast so you don't lose your inspiration.
The section dedicated to mastering is awesome: You can edit a CD in a couple of minutes.
Anonymous 's review
Studio One is a little light on features, I would admit, but it is a program in its infancy, and the goal of Studio One, remember, is to make music production elegant, and not a process or a labor. It should feel like you’re dancing over the DAW. There are a few things that should be addressed, but as far as the structure of the DAW goes, there is not a single other program that does things as intuitively as Studio One does, nor as quickly.
What blew me away was the quality of the built in plug ins. What was lacking were some actual plug ins; a de esser, for example, does not come with the program, but the reverb is unreal for a DAW plug. And the EQ feels incredibly solid. The best part about this program, however, is the mastering integration. This makes it possible to sit down and pound out a project, or a rough cut quickly. I love everything about Studio One, and now that the second version has come out, I can only cross my fingers and hope that they did not go the way of the bloated program.
1 people found this review helpful
Lougarou's review"Optimized Workflow!!"
No incompatibilities with any of the VST/VSTi that I used and still use with S1.
VST/VSTi parameter recognition as soon as they load.
Fast and effective control surface recognition and setup.
Fast, flexible and effective setup of external soundcards.
Ultra-fast learning curve: I spent 3/4 hours to get a hold of it, tops. That same evening it took me 5/6 to redo 3 songs I had recorded with another DAW!!!!
HP DV6 notebook with 4 GB RAM.
PRO 24 soundcard.
S1 runs smoothly, stably and without any issues: It flows.
30-40 tracks with, at least, EQ+Dyn on every track plus 20+ VSTi (+ plenty of automation !!!): no problems.
I've used it for nearly a year and have tested (and continue to test) Samplitude, FL Studio, Reaper, Cubase, Sonar X1. The two latter aren't in my life anymore, not because they were not up to the task, but rather because they are too complicated to allow a good, effective workflow. I keep Samplitude because it has always been my favorite DAW (for mastering especially!!!), I use FL as pattern player (drums in particular...) and for some artistic effects. In my opinion, S1 is on par with REAPER.
But in terms of speed/workflow, S1 is the BEST. You can work really fast with Studio One!!!!
The BIGGEST ADVANTAGE of this DAW is the workflow: A musician wants to make music and the developers of Studio One understood that really well when conceiving the DAW!!
And you can even mix and master everything with a stunning simplicity!!!
Wedges2's review"My favorite DAW"
It isn't very CPU intensive and I'm saying that while using a bad computer for music. I've been using it for over a year and I'm still sticking with it. It rarely crashes. I use Studio One for recording vocals only, so I can't speak on making beats. I know FL makes it much easier to connect midi controllers and integrate hardware. With my setup when using Studio One, which is all hardware, I don't have problems with it.
Studio One is truly great when recording and mixing a song. I've never had such an easy time mixing in any other program. Recording is a breeze as well.
The stock plugins with Studio One are up there with plugins you have to pay for. I know I love the delay, EQ, and reverb. I've never used the compressor but I'm sure it's pretty good.
If you want a smooth time recording a song, editing audio, and mixing it FL is definatly the program for you. To top it off it comes with a "Mastering Section" that I've used for mastering an album. It's very easy to make the levels of the tracks even, and to trim the beginning and ends of all the song. It integrates in with the "Song Mode" so if you make an adjustment to a mix it updates automatically in the mastering section.
Overall Studio One is great in my opinion. It is about the same price as other DAWs but you get more bang for your buck with the plugins it comes with it. I'd recommend it.
mickpecq6's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Understanding simple with a clean interface.
Runs on a laptop Packard Bell i7 dual core 3.1 Ghz, 750 GB HDD and 8 GB of RAM, Windows 7 64-bit. External audio interface Motu Ultralite mk3 hybrid. This works well with a more than acceptable latency of 8 ms.
I own version Producer for 5 months and I am totally satisfied. I also work with Ableton Live Suite 8 and Reaper 64 I should be less since! I especially like the simplicity of the interface, quality plugins and stability provided!
It is a choice I would do without hesitation
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
mikyreale's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Version 2 Producer. A Must"
No inconsistency, it recognizes my imédiatement Presonnus Inspire 1340 keyboard and my Alesis Q 25.
Until now pretty happy, but I did not work on a big project.
At least on my config (Macbook Intel Core two Duo 2.4 Ghz 4 Giga more RAM in Leo.
I've had it three months, I went through the version and then migrated to Artist Producer for a problem of VSTi instrument in unmanaged version Artist.
The pro version is for those who really want to mastering, but hey, I'm not able and I leave that to professional studio after having done my part in me ...
fruityloopseur's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Nice little card"
ASIO codec configuration panel is simple and easy to access.
Then the problem is on my laptop, asus 4gb ddr ram, intel dual core 2GHz, I have constant problems sizzling whatever the choice of latency. On my desktop computer (2g ddr ram, amd athlon 64 dual core 3ghz), no problem, even at the lowest level of latency.
The manual? kessesé it manually?
FITNESS / PERFORMANCE
The supplied software (studio one) is quite limited sequencer (not import new VST) but otherwise very easy to use and quite powerful. but the card is compatible with a large number of software so just take another one if it's not for you.
this is the first usb card I use.
The preamps excellent (it's a bit which made the reputation of the mark)
phantom power supply for static type microphone is available, no problems.
The catch is that PreSonus recommend returning the instrument level line as a drum machine, synthesizer, drum machine or even a mixer. Yet I do it anyway with TD-4K home roland and all is well (setting the knob to the minimum so as not to activate the preamp), and lowering the output level of the battery. The level does not saturate and peak LED (available on boiboite) does not light.
the problem is that a mistake can cause the twisted preamps. At your own risk!
48khz sampling is enough to house the production, quality is very good.
MrIceStorm's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" a nice shot Presonus"
- Perfect, and even on Vista
The general configuration is easy?
Have you experienced any incompatibilities?
- None to date, Vst recognized without any worries.
What is the configuration of your computer?
- AMD Athlon (tm) Dual Core Processor 5400B 2.80 Hz
- Windows XP Professional SP2
- Sound Card: Presonus Inspire 1394 IEEE
The software works he correctly on this configuration?
This software + hardware is stable?
- Except woes of Vista in general, the software is stable on this version of Windows.
For how long have you been using it?
- A few months
Did you try many other models before getting this one?
- Not really.
What thing do you like most/least about it?
+ The effects are of a quality unstoppable.
- = Interface a bit difficult to take in hand.
What is your opinion about the value for the price?
- Excellent, puisqu'acheté with 90% discount.
Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice?
1 people did not find this review helpful
Recognition of other VST and carefree
Installing a PRESONUS 16.4.2, transparent.ma grandmother could do it!
Core ™ 2 Duo E4000 Series
2 GB Dual Channel DDR2 800 (OC bis 1066 MHz)
Presonus 16.4.2 FireWire
Windows XP (SP3)
No worries with this configuration
Can be some bug with Native Instrument (GR4) if abused by activating a 15 simultaneous effects per track
For cons, I had some surprise with Seven in PRO version
Functions, kind of drag midi file or disappeared or mixdown deffectueu
I therefore counsel under WIN XP
After a year and a half of use, no regret at having to pass under one studio
I worked with Logic Audio (V3 and V5), Cubase (VSTi)
I shall never return because the use of Studio One is user friendly, intuitive and final rendering is huge
Mastering tools like "multiband dynamics" are awesome and so on ....
The possibilities with this software are simply magnificent
1 people found this review helpful