PSR-S900 classified ad
New ad alertImages
Videos
Reviews
4.7/5(8 reviews)
38 %
25 %
13 %
Write a user review
clav64beautiful machnine
Published on 10/25/11 at 09:25 (This content has been automatically translated from French)see the manufacturer website ...
USE
very easy to use, super hyper realistic sounds is bluffing
the manual is very well explained
NOTICE GLOBAL
I for 1 year
I had a lot of different keyboard before this one, 2 tyros I sold
I prefer the s900 compared to tyros because much easier to use than tyros and you can do almost the same thing ... for moin expensive
connect to a sound system, you put a tyros and psr s900, no difference means ...
what I like least: nothing
everything's great on this keyboard !!!
I would do without this choice problem eyes closed !!! …
USE
very easy to use, super hyper realistic sounds is bluffing
the manual is very well explained
NOTICE GLOBAL
I for 1 year
I had a lot of different keyboard before this one, 2 tyros I sold
I prefer the s900 compared to tyros because much easier to use than tyros and you can do almost the same thing ... for moin expensive
connect to a sound system, you put a tyros and psr s900, no difference means ...
what I like least: nothing
everything's great on this keyboard !!!
I would do without this choice problem eyes closed !!! …
Read more
see the manufacturer website ...
USE
very easy to use, super hyper realistic sounds is bluffing
the manual is very well explained
NOTICE GLOBAL
I for 1 year
I had a lot of different keyboard before this one, 2 tyros I sold
I prefer the s900 compared to tyros because much easier to use than tyros and you can do almost the same thing ... for moin expensive
connect to a sound system, you put a tyros and psr s900, no difference means ...
what I like least: nothing
everything's great on this keyboard !!!
I would do without this choice problem eyes closed !!!
USE
very easy to use, super hyper realistic sounds is bluffing
the manual is very well explained
NOTICE GLOBAL
I for 1 year
I had a lot of different keyboard before this one, 2 tyros I sold
I prefer the s900 compared to tyros because much easier to use than tyros and you can do almost the same thing ... for moin expensive
connect to a sound system, you put a tyros and psr s900, no difference means ...
what I like least: nothing
everything's great on this keyboard !!!
I would do without this choice problem eyes closed !!!
See less
00
»
girard.hubertPublished on 11/13/09 at 12:08 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Yamaha would do well to take as an example the Korg user guide that is perfectly clear and simple but especially trsdtaille approach.
Gnrale configuration and handling of extremely complex sounds and totally unusable without programming any prior notice for hours.
NOTICE GLOBAL
Using recent weeks.
I have also been a few months Korg PA500. Much simpler and intuitive especially with use in very quick evening.
I recommend especially not the PSR S900. A gale value, the Korg Pa588 is without doubt Superior.
Best Regards.
Gnrale configuration and handling of extremely complex sounds and totally unusable without programming any prior notice for hours.
NOTICE GLOBAL
Using recent weeks.
I have also been a few months Korg PA500. Much simpler and intuitive especially with use in very quick evening.
I recommend especially not the PSR S900. A gale value, the Korg Pa588 is without doubt Superior.
Best Regards.
00
»
Ruddy BOYERVery good keyboard
Published on 09/24/12 at 05:30 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Widely available on the web so I will not copy and paste but in any case sufficiently complete for my use.
UTILIZATION
Fairly easy to use, sound editing simple effective but less complete than Korg or Roland.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 9 months.
I Korg "PA 800" not bad at all (but further editing sounds less good in general from my point of view), Roland G70 (I do not).
There is aa really not something that I like most (all consistent).
The less cons: The "Vocal Harmony" unusable. Very poor quality!
The value for money is okay.
If it again with the same budget, I would do it with him because I earn my living for the moment and I still think for a while to save...…
UTILIZATION
Fairly easy to use, sound editing simple effective but less complete than Korg or Roland.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 9 months.
I Korg "PA 800" not bad at all (but further editing sounds less good in general from my point of view), Roland G70 (I do not).
There is aa really not something that I like most (all consistent).
The less cons: The "Vocal Harmony" unusable. Very poor quality!
The value for money is okay.
If it again with the same budget, I would do it with him because I earn my living for the moment and I still think for a while to save...…
Read more
Widely available on the web so I will not copy and paste but in any case sufficiently complete for my use.
UTILIZATION
Fairly easy to use, sound editing simple effective but less complete than Korg or Roland.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 9 months.
I Korg "PA 800" not bad at all (but further editing sounds less good in general from my point of view), Roland G70 (I do not).
There is aa really not something that I like most (all consistent).
The less cons: The "Vocal Harmony" unusable. Very poor quality!
The value for money is okay.
If it again with the same budget, I would do it with him because I earn my living for the moment and I still think for a while to save time to go to the Tyros 4.
I put 8 because of the harmonizer, otherwise nothing to complain for the price
UTILIZATION
Fairly easy to use, sound editing simple effective but less complete than Korg or Roland.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 9 months.
I Korg "PA 800" not bad at all (but further editing sounds less good in general from my point of view), Roland G70 (I do not).
There is aa really not something that I like most (all consistent).
The less cons: The "Vocal Harmony" unusable. Very poor quality!
The value for money is okay.
If it again with the same budget, I would do it with him because I earn my living for the moment and I still think for a while to save time to go to the Tyros 4.
I put 8 because of the harmonizer, otherwise nothing to complain for the price
See less
00
»
le_pierreHe hides his game ..
Published on 12/05/11 at 12:24 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Well, you know the dj prs little while.
UTILIZATION
The manual may be a little lightweight, but at the same time, the LCD screen is so explicit that it does not impede.
OVERALL OPINION
It's been a few months I use it. That happiness. O When I bought it I was able to compare a Motif ES7. Well, ok the keyboard of the PSR is a bit soft, and it has no sampler Intgr but his ct, we find the same thing for 2 cts. And so, guess who stayed home? Whoever has more amplification and incorporates a harmonizer ... But that's not all: ct of the arranger, it also offers 4-part multitimbral. Hear sounds by 4 DIFFERENT on 4 MIDI channels, with their rglages effect (indpendants those of the...…
UTILIZATION
The manual may be a little lightweight, but at the same time, the LCD screen is so explicit that it does not impede.
OVERALL OPINION
It's been a few months I use it. That happiness. O When I bought it I was able to compare a Motif ES7. Well, ok the keyboard of the PSR is a bit soft, and it has no sampler Intgr but his ct, we find the same thing for 2 cts. And so, guess who stayed home? Whoever has more amplification and incorporates a harmonizer ... But that's not all: ct of the arranger, it also offers 4-part multitimbral. Hear sounds by 4 DIFFERENT on 4 MIDI channels, with their rglages effect (indpendants those of the...…
Read more
Well, you know the dj prs little while.
UTILIZATION
The manual may be a little lightweight, but at the same time, the LCD screen is so explicit that it does not impede.
OVERALL OPINION
It's been a few months I use it. That happiness. O When I bought it I was able to compare a Motif ES7. Well, ok the keyboard of the PSR is a bit soft, and it has no sampler Intgr but his ct, we find the same thing for 2 cts. And so, guess who stayed home? Whoever has more amplification and incorporates a harmonizer ... But that's not all: ct of the arranger, it also offers 4-part multitimbral. Hear sounds by 4 DIFFERENT on 4 MIDI channels, with their rglages effect (indpendants those of the arranger!), Volume, and the whole shebang. With a keyboard 88 notes matre agile connect the MIDI input of bte, then you get the best piano sounds available on a synth and you no longer need to input 2 Are your favorite mixer for apprcier the expertise of Yamaha made available. Thank you that?
UTILIZATION
The manual may be a little lightweight, but at the same time, the LCD screen is so explicit that it does not impede.
OVERALL OPINION
It's been a few months I use it. That happiness. O When I bought it I was able to compare a Motif ES7. Well, ok the keyboard of the PSR is a bit soft, and it has no sampler Intgr but his ct, we find the same thing for 2 cts. And so, guess who stayed home? Whoever has more amplification and incorporates a harmonizer ... But that's not all: ct of the arranger, it also offers 4-part multitimbral. Hear sounds by 4 DIFFERENT on 4 MIDI channels, with their rglages effect (indpendants those of the arranger!), Volume, and the whole shebang. With a keyboard 88 notes matre agile connect the MIDI input of bte, then you get the best piano sounds available on a synth and you no longer need to input 2 Are your favorite mixer for apprcier the expertise of Yamaha made available. Thank you that?
See less
00
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Yamaha
- Model: PSR-S900
- Series: PSR
- Category: Keyboard Arrangers
- Added in our database on: 01/15/2009
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other Yamaha keyboard Arrangers
Other categories in Electronic instrument
Other names: psr s900, psrs900, psr s 900