All user reviews for the Steinberg Cubase SX 3

yes, the are very simple installation,
and are a very practical configuration.

yes there there's inconsistencies, but he tj a means of arranged, but be patient!

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

I do not know her, but I think 4gb ram
internal sound card insufficient refrigerant, it takes an external.

And yes with external card are very stable configuration.

OVERALL OPINION

it is about 7 years, but I switched to 5
and I played su Fl studio / ableton / Traktor and can.

I prefer to voice sounds fx and pre adjustable automation!

concern that are all paying the vst sounds, but they are worth!

there are good, but I would advise you 5 or 7 (or 4 or 6) asse not change (improvement) in the other one!

installation without pb
configuration: do not hesitate to work hard to win more work in real time without latency
Compatibility: I work with an old Edirol UA1000: Never bp
Manual very clear both in french and English

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

with the current computer, no pb to run the same software with 2 gigabytes of RAM
The most important is to have fast hard drives (7200 rpm)
SATA 2 is better
where your resource will begin to put a lap if you will start to load a plug in
I went receemnent a dual core intel (due to failure) has an AMD quad core, I did not feel any real difference in performance
I stayed with Windows XP against .. not trust the new OS

OVERALL OPINION

I have now for years and do qq part with it for anything, because I already know on the fingertips and I do not want to réaprendre new software!
against it by, I think, really a tool to engineer the first. In the hands of a musician with no real knowledge of the mix (and I do surout offend anyone!) It may be a bit complicated in terms of musical composition.

can be for them should he prefer a good old logic audio (which in fact I ream out a mix correct!) much more intuitive.

in cubase, I find myself better in a studio setup "is the old"
with a console, rack effects and insert as the good old days of analog

course on the other hand I really appreciate not to have a cutter to cut the tape 1 / 4 inch to my audio editing!

I am certainly not here not to restart the old battle analog / digital, I think just simply the result of salvation has come to make the best of both.

regardless of the tool, the most important is the quality of the worker is not it?

Your musical

soundman172

installation without problem.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Yes stable, everything is ok at the technical level.

OVERALL OPINION

This version of Cubase SX3 is the most stable and most complete of all versions.

DO NOT cder to + mirrors larks new features in version 5 or CUBASE CUBASE 6, but at the cost of a philosophy diffrent well in the management of some parameter.
- VST plugins presets to the new application format "vst3preset" which is a format Cuabse Owner '5 / 6
- The impossibility of manually back up these so-called SETTING THE VST plugins and the obligation to go through the MediaBay, gre by Steinberg
- MediaBay, like all "virtualization library of deals, is to be much more dangerous than leaving the user grate by him even its own records.
Indeed what intrt Defines the amount of adjectives associated with WAVs, AIF, etc.. if it is to risk the whole day on one computer changes.
If you have a computer at home and in the studio, it becomes ingrable.

Although there is sr VST Expression, but I think it is a mirror for larks, it will take as given that the following plugins QUALITY. I mean, for example those of an artist can prfrer (example for me, "Synful Orchestra, Wivi Band," The Trumpet "," The Sax Brothers "and other exprimentaux). But the only follow this new standard (VST Expression) are Vienna (very nice but extremely coteux!) or ... Halion!: I think for the orchestra, General MIDI sounds amliors, but with an orchestral Halion, bah veil "shouts".
the old "Tchaaaaaang, Tchaaaaaaang" strings ... I like the vintage but l. Here I prfre Synful Orchestra /
(Some examples in music "contemporary"
# https://www.youtube.com/cslevine p/u/22/HEgzIUESU-I
http://www.cslevine.com/2008/Messiaen.htm
)
or the Reaktor. But those are not pass the VST Expression.
In addition to CUBASE 5 always ATTENTION the compatibility of old VST plugins one, some simply do not walk more!
When the VST Bridge caused me directly at my crashes.
More DirectX plugin no longer!


Strangely I have not spoken with version 5 as SX3, just to say that I was still with CUBASE SX3 now late 2011 and put my CUBASE 5 days I'm using it more.

SX3 v3.1.944 is the latest version of Cubase valid. APRS is that Steinberg t bought by Yamaha.

Problem-free installation
Configuration gnrale takes a little practice (because complte trs)
No incompatibility.
Light & Full Manual

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Acer (quite old now) / pentium4 2.6 GHz / HDD 5400RPM / soundcard: M-Audio FireWire 410 / Control Interface: Tascam US-428 / master keyboard Fatar
Latency of 7.8 ms base
The software works well for trs what I did.
This config stuff / trs app is stable

OVERALL OPINION

7 years

not

most: trs complete
the least: sometimes compliqubr />
good value qualitprix

yes

Installation is no problem it?
Yes, in order:
- Installation of XP-Pro + sp3
- The driver for the Motu 828 MKII
- To end of SX3

Have you encountered any incompatibilities?
Yes with Native products: my machine does not include a CD player,
Systm the protection could not validate the installation of battery

Gnrale configuration is easy?
qunad we know a little cubase, yes


The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
yes (it is important to read to understand the routing)

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

What is the configuration of your computer? (Motherboard / CPU / RAM / disk / sound card ..)
4u rack PC P4E 200GB Hd

The software works there correctly on this configuration?
P4 shows the limits on projects of more than 8 tracks 32/96
with compressor, convolution reverb and paramtrique per track

This software + hardware configuration is stable?
yes

OVERALL OPINION

How long have you use it?
Since 2005

What is the particular feature you like best and least?
Do not plant

Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Logic Audio

How do you report qualitprix?
the silent era dplorable it, especially for a Shift!

With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
for MIDI yes + audio
for the audio only I would take reappear ...

The installation went smoothly.
Easy configuration
I encountered no hardware incompatibility.
I did not need the manual to turn it on, to really understand by against the beast and tried to manage at least 50% capacity I bought the official guide.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

My configuration of the time:
pc motherboard with AMD Athlon XP 3500 +
AMD Athlon XP processor 2200 ghz
1024 mb ram
hard drive - 80 GB (system)
- 320 GB (storage)
Soundcard: Tascam us122
Master keyboard CME MKEY
Operating system Windows XP
The software works perfectly on this setup.
The hardware + software is very stable

OVERALL OPINION

I used it from 2005 to 2010
I was working on VST32 cubase, cakewalk pro audio 8, cakewalk sonar 5.
I started working with the SX3 in my installation in France. The fact of attending studios homes where everyone is registered on the SX3 or protools made me do it. If not personally, at that time I had a preference for products cakewalk.
The special feature I liked best without hesitation, its perfect management rewire. Cubase and Reason in the master live in rewire, vst instrument in fruity loops while running without crashing!
The value for money is nickel, it is a good investment.
Yes I would do with the experience that choice, even if today I went on cubase 5

Cumbersome and tedious installation:
. I make an update of an SX SX 3,
. Dongle, shit and I do not think it is effective trs: I know there are web versions of Cubase SX trs many cracks,
. installation and day Syncrosoft: no real explanation Retailer in the doc,
. the installation software does not load the Uninstallation of previous version and do not automatically rcupre + VST instruments I had an SX in addition, I have to do everything by hand,
. no indication on how to follow: should first uninstall the previous version? how its rcuprer + VST instruments?
. when I want to do the updating of SX 3 SX 3.01.514 (download on the site of Steinberg), the installation crashes because it lacks the file asiodxfd.dll. I sent a message to support Steinberg and I think when I get a rponse rsolu my problem, as usual,
. when you first launch the application, I had problem during testing ASIO (ASIO Multimedia Setup) who rsolus alone after a while ... trs trs especially suspect Nerva.

for proceeds of this award and from the time, Steinberg would have made an effort, the messages are sometimes 'Cut' from the windows.

is the pdf doc.

Conclusion: I've had for 2 hours, yet I am not a computer sleeve (and I'm not bragging). I would deal with the Steinberg team of wankers.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

PC Pentium 4, 768MB RAM, Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2, Sound Card M-Audio Delta 66.

The software works well but eats and eats CPU resources. trslger not all. it is rapidly slowed down when using more VST Ohmforce type and I do automation.

configuration seems stable.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for one day.

from the weight of the product, there is a new trick that dchire: CRER the ability of VST virtual synths that drive external devices.
example:
I have a Novation A-Station. I CRER a window that mimics the front of my computer with all the pots, I can assign each MIDI signal knob adquate. well, I drive my synth from a user-friendly that even I myself cre (quite easily) and I can do automation like any VST synth! So the ball.

the interface is nice, but too thick.

qualitprix report: bof. if I have the courage, I change to something more squenceur lightweight which is essential.

Installation nikel, no inconsistency, logical configuration when the manual ... I have fortunately not had to use it for now ... finally

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

PC Pentium 4, 1GB Ram, Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2, Sound Card M-Audio Delta 10/10.
The software works perfectly, I use the audio (minimum20 tracks) + MIDI (external and internal instruments) no conflict ptites full of tricks to free up CPU is stable, well done ...

OVERALL OPINION

I use Cubase SX3 since late March, I am printing all its new features and well thought trs trs practices, for my part I did steinberg RVer ...
qualitprix report ... well ok it is when even super expensive but good vla the killing ....
I would do without this choice hsitation ...

- Installation: no problems. I regret that the update driver Synchrosoft (dongle) is required for an update, but good (it is imposed each time the same day when the minor is dernire). In this regard, consider dcocher check box "Install drivers for dongle parallle" if your dongle is a USB, Vitera has an install and a reboot of the PC useless. -1 For a.
- Incompatibility: I have not met my Systm hardware and software.
- Configuration gnrale: nothing wrong, is in line with the previous version. I think the management of MIDI I / O done better (sparation drivers 'Muls' clearer).
- Clarity manual: paper always minimum PDF version complte still and clear my mind.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

- Computer Configuration: Asus P5AD2, P4 3.6 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 4 x HDD 200 GB, RME Fireface800
- Correct operation of the software in this conf: Yes, perfect!
- Performance: pfff! Far more than I need, even with multiple VSTi greedy!
- Stabilit software + hardware configuration: Absolutely no problem since the day of SX2 SX3 (was 3 months now). I had no problems with SX2 either.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it? : For years I use Cubase, I started with APRS Pro24. I use this version SX3 the past three months.
- What is the particular feature you like best and least? : Finally, it is not the "heavy duty" Audio Warp style that make me drool. Small dtails style automatic change of the function of the mouse in the editor PianoRoll (MIDI) according to whether the cursor is in the box score or in the area controller, which save a lot of time (no need to change tools every two seconds to change the VLOC dplacer and notes). Better management as well (I think it at least) of navigation in the project, more enjoyable than before (I can not explain it well but I find it more convenient, it is faster o you will).
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir? : No.
- How do you report qualitprix? : Trs good!
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ... Yes.

New installation without problem, everything is clear in the manual, you must be a user of calculator and no PC is wrong!

No incompatibility everything works normally until proven otherwise.

Take the time to customize their software but I think the possibilities are now standard and can do almost anything.

The manual, I like all the t's have not had one of fontions advances. The grip is plmutt for beginners but once you know the principle of Cubase SX, it is plutt other feature will matter most!
For the price, I expected better from Steinberg!

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

I possde a P4 3.2GHz, Asus P5P800 motherboard, 2GB Ram, 5DD (UltraATA 200GB, 160GB, 120GB and 40GB External USB2 and USB2, 250GB FireWire800) And all with an audio interface RME HDSP9652.

No problem running the software.

I used a pass 10 times VSTi (not the smaller) a convolution rverb or two, other effects ... and I got used 1600Mo RAM and the processor did not suffer too much, then, with my config, perfect c

Everything is perfectly stable.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it now for 2 weeks

Cubase is great compared to other full pro software that I use too (I will mention no names) and I find agnial I said is, if when I need to do a, I am not brake.

I dj essay Cakewalk, Sonar, Logic, Samplitude

It's expensive for a normal budget but the power of the product, I think the normal price.

No problem, I intend to stay updated with the program.

I am new to compltement Contents computer music: first bought squenceur APRS software testing with Cubase SX1 Intervac I found the atmosphere.
So it's not an update, problem-free installation
Large box containing the software, the key, the manual paper (modif: amber too! Good for beginners ... but APRS must print the equivalent of a ream of Parpia and qq ink cartridge = add to the price?) dmo two CDs (and hypersonic Halion 3)
Otherwise the installation it is not same problem this is on C: or another partition or another DD

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Edit: P IV 560 (3.6) with two 300 GB HDD 16 MB cache and 78 GB (backup), 1.5 GB DDR2 400 MHz
Emu 1820 sound card, Win XP
Software trs stable (no crashes in 4 months!)
MIDI Instrument: Korg Triton
VSTI: Arturia vintage pack and Spectrasonics Atmosphere

OVERALL OPINION

I find the software still expensive and it took me some time to get the DCID acqurir! The key policy is ridiculous and annoying compltement and especially it is fragile! And this does not prevent the software be pirate! And designers should be aware that pirated software is Russian will eventually be purchased by his employer! A kind of BMD with a longer time!
Using other software professionals in other fields and more expensive but less "anti security security at all" (and less cracks!) I find this idiot to piss off the buyer of the software : this alone makes me lower the note.
modif:
I use it for 5 months:
Rather beginners, I use just for MIDI
difficulties encountered are difficulty = Intgr some plug-ins (atmosphre Spectrasonics), but dernire MAJ appears to have corrected this! The work on the air less flexible and user-friendly than Sound Forge! protection policy steinberg trs irritating and ridiculous pnalisante! The closure of the software a bit long!
The pros: the appearance grip fast enough for recording audio, the interface enjoyable
I personally do not find too much gas plant as can be read here or the possibilities seem endless

To be honnte, I will not change the standard choice given the work to get used to the software and go around ...

The installation was without problem, the update also.
on the other hand I do not understand why but that initially the branch copy protection dongle usb ports on the rear of my tower, it is inefficient if I now connects the port faade (which are branchs, however, I use them for other peripherals).
The software is very easy to customize, by the way the update 3.1 brings tural amliorations for ergonomics.
The printed manual is very well but it would aprci a paper version also features Retailer. If not using HTML is very practical.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

- What is the configuration of your computer? (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Disk / sound card ..)
2.8GHzC Pentium, motherboard ASUS P4P800deluxe, 1GB of Corsair RAM, sound card RME Fireface, UAD1 dsp cards, pci firewire card (firewire port on the motherboard is incompatible s'tant rvl with the Fireface or not good enough)
No problem of stability I even have a fairly large number of applications other than cubase launchers without this seems to bother with anything.
Performance is good trs, no problem with audio sessions over 30 tracks "linear" (I mean by this is not just bits of audio 2sec rp ts taken but the length of the piece.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it? 2 months sx3 for several years for older versions
- What is the particular feature you like best and least? the possibilities s version x3 to use external effects. if the ergonomics standard software. [/ b]
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir? I had the opportunity to use a system that protools caliber throughout my studies, also Logic Audio, Cubase for me is the most ractif and more intuitive.
The report price is trs good quality (I bought just under 700)
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ... it is precisely with the exprience that I made that choice.

Installation: I have installed this software several times (because of the crash of the motherboard, among other concerns), each time the installation went smoothly.

Incompatibilities: None.

Easy configuration?: Without any difficulty.

Manual: getting started is frankly too brief, and I agree with other users, for the price, a paper manual is not a luxury. Especially since the manual partition editor in French is not available to my knowledge. Owners of Steinberg would they be shareholders Eyrolles editions?

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

My current configuration: P4 2.4 Ghz, Asus P4P800X, a P-ATA HDD 80 GB, an S-ATA HDD 300 GB, Sound Card Wami Rack 192-X

Cubase SX3 works perfectly with all the features I've worked with, even if it means that the software Intel prefers to the more exotic such as VIA or SIS: I want this information from my dealer.

Performance: a score using virtual instruments and plug-ins per session CPU consumers, I've never had a major concern and it happened to me in reading the CPU is a little behind, but in this case, I increase the latency of the sound card, and voila!

OVERALL OPINION

I use Cubase Cubase since version 5.1 and I went through all the upgrades and updates since then I've never regretted it. Steinberg was the genius who is editing software that adapt to all kind of users, from amateur to professional composer beginning, from studios to home studio through the DJ ... everyone can find their account.
That is why if the adventure was Cubase again, without hesitation I would do, even if the initial investment is heavy (5000 in F at the time), as soon as that step, the world of computer music was flung open and barrier-free ...
A note on the protection policy Steinberg: I ​​feel the only hassle is that the USB port protection occupies a USB on a desktop PC, no problem, most PCs today are teams of 6 to 8 USB ports, but on a laptop in most cases only contains three! What if you use several software claiming all their USB drive and want to connect more USB mouse, a USB hard drive or a USB sound card?

No problem to install, no configuration incompatibility gnral do me any possible problem specific.
So for the manual! Bin Obviously it's really abuse it is not printed for that price ... but at the same time I understand because I printed the Steinberg intgralit of manual functions that given my size and a standard volume! its thickness should be 8cm and A4 size! then on a small format like the manual handling something that would make too gros.Je think is why Steinberg does not deliver in print.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

AMD Mobile Sempron, 512 MB RAM, sound card m-audio fast track.
No bug yet so yes it is stable.
Its performences are Ingals ... We can all do ... no brakes! Simply magical ...

OVERALL OPINION

That I am now 1month use.
What I like most is its simplicity.
What I like least euuuuu .. .. I find anything I do not like ..
Before I cubase SX SE, so I upgrade to SX.
Quality good price trs nothing to say on it.
OOOO yes I refer this choice! it's great!

The installation couraging no problem. As against it seems to me that this software works only under XP. It's a shame.
No inconsistency.
I Cubase VST 5. Cubs 3 SX possde a more user-friendly interface and offers more possibilities (which I use a small part).
This is an excellent program that addresses all (beginners as professionals) provided to devote some time and its use to refer to the manual (which could be even more detail.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

My computer is not puissannt trs (Athlon XP 1600 +). It dates from 2001. Yet it is sufficient to run the software.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it recently. It is true that the price is quite lev. Anyway it is a product of high quality.

Easy installation. some incompatibilities with RME Fireface quickly settled by the Swiss supplier of the product (drivers).
Easy config for anyone interested in sound and computers in general.
I found the manual a bit light for me.
I have often called a buddy at the beginning for reasons not detailed in the manual but when I need a function, I'm looking far enough in compréhenssion and it is not the purpose of the manual to tell all .

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

XEON dual processor, 2 GB of RAM, half Tera drive, ASUS, RME Fireface 800 ...
Machine installed with Windows Server 2003 and not XP (not flexible enough for music)

I often work 13 to 15 hours without restarting the machine when none or Cubase.
Even at Mac, I have not seen that. His running for three years and I never again anything at all maintenance or separate config defrag and an occasional cleaning (file transfer).
The perfs? Ben I run frequently from 15 to 30 stereo track, MIDI at the same time, the effects on each track (compr-gate-delay-flange etc. ..), a dozen reverbs and everything is fine people working without problems.

In general, I have more than half of perfs after that. I have never used the feature freeze. Well, I had to say it anyway.

Against by the start of the config, I edited the sub tasks and I am still a disk image. Worth for ten minutes, reboot the whole system in case of problems.

OVERALL OPINION

I started with the older versions and am now SX3.xx.
No such monitoring on large consoles to send a premix in the headphone of the singer. Apparently this is possible in version 4 but frankly I'm tired of ironing every time at the checkout!
Original effects that are worth nothing! If only they were in steinberg some reading! I use no effects of origin.
Good value. Something finally pro evolving but we need guys to talk more with Cubase musicos because I may not say but the effect worthless. For if I say? Oh sorry!

I stand at the moment but the competition looks increasingly VST so in the future, I guarantee nothing.

Ah, I've said I was not happy effects in Cubase?

Happy New Year 2007 to all. Full of music and small or large projects!

- The installation was done alone
- I had some problems with my usb ports, it is enough that I install the drivers for USB 2.0 so that it works correctly.
- After 2-3 clicks, go!
- The tutorials on the net have summers much more effective ...

8 / 10 because of the manual

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

- I use a Line6 POD XT as "sound card" and guitar amp, otherwise the bike side, AMD Athlon 1700 + 512MB

- It's more than enough for a couple of tracks, with MIDI and more.

- My computer crashed when I run SX3 because there was the sound card of the computer that fesait conflict with the pod xt, but it was enough that I remove completely the sound card of the computer and it was in cubase set.

8 / 10 because of the mismanagement of the program to switch between the two motherboards

OVERALL OPINION

- I use it since September 2005
- I find it extremely easy to use, the effects I use them because of the Quantity already present in the pod (with 3 packs of effect), the interface is ergonomic, customizable, who could ask for more?
- I tried other programs like samplitube, SoundForge and other freeware sx3 but still one that suits me the most.
- Well for the price when a student is expensive! But it's worth Vallue.
- If I had to redo the election, yes I would do now.

8 / 10 because of the price

Steinbergs Cubase sx3 is a great program for audio production. You will be able to compose great songs with the Cubase line of software. I have been using Cubase sx3 for a while now and its very similar to the other versions of Cubase software. I ran it on a windows xp computer with 3gigs and it ran very well and fast.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Most of the stock sounds that come with the program I didn’t use. I am never a fan of the stock sounds that most programs come with because most of them sound thin and not full and well rounded. But after purchasing a few racks I was right in the mix and started making great music. I love the midi control with this program you can sync all of your gear up right away and very easy. Not too mention the ability to edit your midi notes, which is very easy.

OVERALL OPINION

Overall it’s a powerful program but in my opinion since I wasn’t using any stock sounds and rewiring fl studio into this program there really wasn’t too much of a need for the program its self. Most other high quality music production software’s are just like this one, and for the price its about the same as all of the other softwares. But Cubase continues to come out with upgrades and keep improving on the product that they put out so hopefully they will find a way to separate themselves from all of the other midi softwares that are on the market today. I suggest trying other softwares if you are just starting out though, they navigation through Cubase sx3 can get to be a bit overwhelming if you are new to it. But if you are a vet and understand programs like these then Cubase sx3 will work perfect for you and you will be creating music in no time.

- Installation is it without problem?
without any problem.

- Have you experienced any incompatibility?
When I was Digi001, Cubase does not recognize her, I had the good ASIO driver but can not put (erreur.) I reinstalled cubase and now it works.

- The configuration gnrale is easy?
there is not much to do. If an interface possde multi I / O must be configured and you can save lots of preferences so it's customizable trs.

- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
Aps I actually read the manual, I looked on the internet plutt when I needed to know something. But indeed we touch a little while to learn (well I always do as a)

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

- What is the configuration of your computer? (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Disk / sound card ..)
Pentium IV 2.93GHz, 2.46 GB DDRII, HDD: 160GB internal + 320 GB external sound card from Hercules Muse 5.1 and Digi 001 interface

- The software works he correctly on this configuration?
Trs Yes well, I dj record multiple tracks simultaneously with plug-in without crashing or anything rammer. (A hand that Digidesign ASIO ancessiter Reinstalling a)

- This software + hardware configuration is stable?
yes no problem

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
9 months

- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
most: we save: the mixer with an infinite number of tracks, all rack effects imaginable thanks to the VST plug-in (many free), once we lose the least in all cables (quoique. ..), the audio edition, midi in real time, go with a tape recorder or other magntique simple. And also, and especially the possibility of recording space: the sounds are recorded on Monday (the studio to get a better sound) and we all the rest of the week or more to mix, edit, ...
the least: we lose can be a little atmosphere of the studio, we must remain planted in front of the computer (has No Life), and this computer must be relatively strong so quite new for the maximum capacity software.

- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
I Mix Music Studio 3: Cubase 3.0 go, and WaveLabLite MasterUnit is equivalent, but older.

- How do you report qualitprix?
Even when it is expensive, especially that there are versions ultrieures, but when you think that has SAVE.

- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
Yes

No installation problems. As a letter in the mail ...
No incompatibilities.
Very simple configuration.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

AMD 5000 + Dual-Core/3Go ram / 500 GB HDD / Audiophile USB
The software is very stable.

OVERALL OPINION

I'm working on it for 2 years. And I will not change so soon ...
Most: Everything ...
The -: Nothing ...
I tried Cubase and Cubase VST 5 SL2 and SX3 is the best.
A little expensive but vautle time.
I will take it without worries.