View other reviews for this product:
Bilouli
Published on 01/24/06 at 08:08
I take the characteristics of this news (https://fr.audiofanzine.com/news/index 2Cid_news%%% 2C52283% 2Cnews 2Csiel-numark dxm-pro.html-).
* Cross fader interchangeable polymer with adjustable curve inversion.
* 2 Phono, 5 Line inputs, a microphone input.
* Outputs Master symmetrical monitor outputs, optical and coaxial digital outputs.
* 3-band EQ per channel with full cut
* 24-bit digital signal for sound quality copy.
* Interchangeable faders with adjustable curves and reverse.
* Peak Limiters out in advance.
* Previewing Cue by mini crossfader with tone control.
UTILIZATION
- The general configuration is it simple?
Yes the general configuration could not be simpler, that's what I liked.
- The usual functions are they easily accessible?
Absolutely. Note the lack of balance on the table.
I would like to add my opinion on the mnicrossfader for mixing tracks in the headphones. This is the black point of the table (for me), this "mini crossfader" is not really solid (though I'm kind of careful and quite tricky with the stuff).
I use this table for four months (not in heavy use, small techno mixes from 2 to 3 hours at home in some irregular) and I am entitled for some time to false contacts when listening in the headphones . Of course in a mix that is very annoying and the problem is getting worse. So SAV back for repair.
The crossfader and faders are in turn much stronger than minicrossfader.
Also there is no balance on the table. For simple installation with little equipment, turntables, mixer, amp and speakers, not to the scale can be really annoying but it's a personal opinion.
SOUNDS
- The console is transparent?
I use it in a techno HiFi installation, I think the sound is slightly muffled, but I'm not experienced enough to rate a really clear.
- Introduced she breath?
It has never shocked, and my listeners (tested in a Technics headphones and JM Lab of HP and Infinity), but the table must surely introduce a very light wind.
- The equalizer is effective?
Quite the equalizer are good qualities, that's what I was looking particularly good at this point .. In terms of total break I confirm it works on hair.
OVERALL OPINION
- How long have you use it?
I use it for four months. Mix techno only.
- What is so special that you like most and least?
Plus, the quality of the equalizer and, I admit, aesthetics.
(S) less, the fragility of minicrossfader for headphones, the inversions of the faders that (for me) are useless.
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
I started there eight years on a Gemini (a very old low-end table), I tried an Ecler Smac Pro20 and I had an Ecler Smac Pro4 (good stuff).
- How would you rate the quality / price?
Relatively correct, for there can be little more better.
- With experience, you do again this choice?
Not that table was a little disappointed at the sight of the price I expected something a bit beefier. If it again, in roughly the same price I would take again in a Rodec Mixbox MKII for use techno of course.
* Cross fader interchangeable polymer with adjustable curve inversion.
* 2 Phono, 5 Line inputs, a microphone input.
* Outputs Master symmetrical monitor outputs, optical and coaxial digital outputs.
* 3-band EQ per channel with full cut
* 24-bit digital signal for sound quality copy.
* Interchangeable faders with adjustable curves and reverse.
* Peak Limiters out in advance.
* Previewing Cue by mini crossfader with tone control.
UTILIZATION
- The general configuration is it simple?
Yes the general configuration could not be simpler, that's what I liked.
- The usual functions are they easily accessible?
Absolutely. Note the lack of balance on the table.
I would like to add my opinion on the mnicrossfader for mixing tracks in the headphones. This is the black point of the table (for me), this "mini crossfader" is not really solid (though I'm kind of careful and quite tricky with the stuff).
I use this table for four months (not in heavy use, small techno mixes from 2 to 3 hours at home in some irregular) and I am entitled for some time to false contacts when listening in the headphones . Of course in a mix that is very annoying and the problem is getting worse. So SAV back for repair.
The crossfader and faders are in turn much stronger than minicrossfader.
Also there is no balance on the table. For simple installation with little equipment, turntables, mixer, amp and speakers, not to the scale can be really annoying but it's a personal opinion.
SOUNDS
- The console is transparent?
I use it in a techno HiFi installation, I think the sound is slightly muffled, but I'm not experienced enough to rate a really clear.
- Introduced she breath?
It has never shocked, and my listeners (tested in a Technics headphones and JM Lab of HP and Infinity), but the table must surely introduce a very light wind.
- The equalizer is effective?
Quite the equalizer are good qualities, that's what I was looking particularly good at this point .. In terms of total break I confirm it works on hair.
OVERALL OPINION
- How long have you use it?
I use it for four months. Mix techno only.
- What is so special that you like most and least?
Plus, the quality of the equalizer and, I admit, aesthetics.
(S) less, the fragility of minicrossfader for headphones, the inversions of the faders that (for me) are useless.
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
I started there eight years on a Gemini (a very old low-end table), I tried an Ecler Smac Pro20 and I had an Ecler Smac Pro4 (good stuff).
- How would you rate the quality / price?
Relatively correct, for there can be little more better.
- With experience, you do again this choice?
Not that table was a little disappointed at the sight of the price I expected something a bit beefier. If it again, in roughly the same price I would take again in a Rodec Mixbox MKII for use techno of course.