Berzin
Published on 02/19/07 at 05:12
This enclosure is Designed to accompany the head Shiva. Unlike what is said in the title, it is open and not closed. It is two Celestion V30 team for a impdance announcement of eight ohms, although mine is in sixteen. Its weight is about twenty-five kilograms. It is a mono speaker. It is extremely well finished, which is normal, considering the price. I find trs class. Although much smaller than its cousins in Bogner, its height is relatively large for a 2x12. A small regret: it has a unique grip on the top. Latrales the grips are comfortable and the grip up a little when ESG wants to ask a head or combo above. The balance is prcaire and must be put shims to stabilize the whole. It's bad when even pens!
Before possder the baffle, I had an E112 and a Peavey 1922 Marshall. I will not give you the insult to compare them to the Bogner. His level, I find that the records are well balance, even if the mdiums prdominent. Submitted are low and round. The only small acute Reserved For I find a bit garish. But I also think that HP need to be rods and the sound should soften with time. Level projection is Drout. When I test for the first time I played trs prs baffle for possible rgler the amp on. later, I drop a few meters and I took an earful. The projection is excellent. Above, a parat low, but four meters in front of you your deaf!
That's my opinion, an excellent speaker, although I have not had the opportunity to compare it with other high-end speakers (Mesa, Soldano, CAA, etc.).. I like its simplicity it sound quite traditional (open baffle), its projection and Aesthetics lgante trs. I regret the design of the grip. However, we do not have the ide Mtera it's a bit expensive for some boards and two HP. But in fact, competition poster rates in the same waters, so ...
Edit: After a few time, hps are now part of the small rods and garish appearance does feel more. The sound is beautiful. I could compare it with a Marshall 1960 4x12 standard and well spread, the silent Bogner comparable or better and Marshall had less bass!
Before possder the baffle, I had an E112 and a Peavey 1922 Marshall. I will not give you the insult to compare them to the Bogner. His level, I find that the records are well balance, even if the mdiums prdominent. Submitted are low and round. The only small acute Reserved For I find a bit garish. But I also think that HP need to be rods and the sound should soften with time. Level projection is Drout. When I test for the first time I played trs prs baffle for possible rgler the amp on. later, I drop a few meters and I took an earful. The projection is excellent. Above, a parat low, but four meters in front of you your deaf!
That's my opinion, an excellent speaker, although I have not had the opportunity to compare it with other high-end speakers (Mesa, Soldano, CAA, etc.).. I like its simplicity it sound quite traditional (open baffle), its projection and Aesthetics lgante trs. I regret the design of the grip. However, we do not have the ide Mtera it's a bit expensive for some boards and two HP. But in fact, competition poster rates in the same waters, so ...
Edit: After a few time, hps are now part of the small rods and garish appearance does feel more. The sound is beautiful. I could compare it with a Marshall 1960 4x12 standard and well spread, the silent Bogner comparable or better and Marshall had less bass!