View other reviews for this product:
boogie les bons tuyaux « not so bad, but .... »
Published on 04/10/14 at 02:02How long have you use it?
2 years, often or very often
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
weight, of course.
the weight tolerance curve is inverted to that of the age, the more veillit least we want to wear a 4X12 beech ...
and finish also pretty simple, efficient and very good.
least, and that is what triggered in me the need to share my opinion, it may be that it is quite difficult to transplant.
I tried everything, from Sennheiser, a 57, before the cone, X, with one foot, without foot ..
difficult to find the desired sound and lack of potato facade (live)
and even, I would say that the loop does not leave much of coup.comme if the speaker does not suppportait full range of sound.
I have for my part to acquire the palmer DI to solve this problem.
to € 500/600 baffle, it's moan.
something else, as I had said plusbas, mesa, engl of including a 4X12 Hugues & Kettner (only the weight makes me wish me to be separated), and although the DVMARK still does not measure up to V30 or greenback.
clear, Crunch, small or big it is saturated, it will encaisse.ça.
but if I really push, I feel it is at 110% capacity.
it cash, but not sublime sound.
it remains in the bowl, the projection is as compressed limited.
this is not why he is revealed.
So quick summary:
The pros:
- Weight ... on top, even
- Finishing, quality, wiring, connectors: the top.
the -:
I specify that is my case (cabinet is 100% of my live, I play twice a week) and I need 20% of the time a very large saturation.
- Transplanting; small piano bar, repet, studio, it fait.en the console, take a DI
- Lack of bass response is big and not cash my JVM 410 OD2 channel correctly
Have you tried many other models before buying it?
H & K, engl, marshall, engl and mesa
How would you rate the quality / price?
quite expensive, but innovation is paie.c is well finished!.
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
I'll keep it, but two or three things grieve me anyway, if I had known before, I might have expected (in my case again)
2 years, often or very often
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
weight, of course.
the weight tolerance curve is inverted to that of the age, the more veillit least we want to wear a 4X12 beech ...
and finish also pretty simple, efficient and very good.
least, and that is what triggered in me the need to share my opinion, it may be that it is quite difficult to transplant.
I tried everything, from Sennheiser, a 57, before the cone, X, with one foot, without foot ..
difficult to find the desired sound and lack of potato facade (live)
and even, I would say that the loop does not leave much of coup.comme if the speaker does not suppportait full range of sound.
I have for my part to acquire the palmer DI to solve this problem.
to € 500/600 baffle, it's moan.
something else, as I had said plusbas, mesa, engl of including a 4X12 Hugues & Kettner (only the weight makes me wish me to be separated), and although the DVMARK still does not measure up to V30 or greenback.
clear, Crunch, small or big it is saturated, it will encaisse.ça.
but if I really push, I feel it is at 110% capacity.
it cash, but not sublime sound.
it remains in the bowl, the projection is as compressed limited.
this is not why he is revealed.
So quick summary:
The pros:
- Weight ... on top, even
- Finishing, quality, wiring, connectors: the top.
the -:
I specify that is my case (cabinet is 100% of my live, I play twice a week) and I need 20% of the time a very large saturation.
- Transplanting; small piano bar, repet, studio, it fait.en the console, take a DI
- Lack of bass response is big and not cash my JVM 410 OD2 channel correctly
Have you tried many other models before buying it?
H & K, engl, marshall, engl and mesa
How would you rate the quality / price?
quite expensive, but innovation is paie.c is well finished!.
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
I'll keep it, but two or three things grieve me anyway, if I had known before, I might have expected (in my case again)