Ecler nuo3

As indicated in the news:

* Power dcoupage (90-260V) oversized.
* Pr-amp Intgr.
* 60mm Fader with VCA.
* Extra large rotary knobs.
* 3-band EQ with Cut.
* Switch off by bass.
* RCA input / output for external effects stro.
* Double VU nitre ultra prcis (PFL / Mix).
* LEDs prsence signal and clip through.
* Switches rtro-clear LEDs tilted by 20.
* Symtrique output XLR.

UTILIZATION

Trs easy to use, no need to read the instructions to understand the basic functions.

Orders have t r-organized from the smacpro30 and are really willing.
Aside from possibly be the rglages faders and x-fader situs forward, I do not have, but it's a personal decision.
The faders are nice and soft trs, however I find the curve a little bit special.
Precision: We can rgler the curve tracks 1 & 3!
This time it leaves the placement Ecler oblique and vertical prfre faders.
The large knobs are nice correction, nanmoins is lacking a bit of space, for example to turn a two corrections same way is not the top. They are notched on the 0, but we feel pain, it's nice, but I fear that a lack of precision hair.
Given the two-nitre are useful because trs trs prcis, finished tracks that balance in the mix than the other 10 dB!

SOUNDS

I find the best correections dcoupes as the smacpro30. Indeed, now the medium cup + in medium / high as + smac that drew in the medium / bass.
Nuo3 on, when you cut the bass is not heard in rsons mediums.

Sonoritsgnrales level we remain in the quality Ecler, no surprise, then.

OVERALL OPINION

I reu the mixer this week, so I do not have much down to really judge everything, but I can already say that it is a good table trs, which succde dignity the SMAC.

No rack
3-way RCA
3 outputs: one in XLR3, and CAR, plus the output rec CAR.
Output / FX CAR between the levels of which are adjustable by a knob for each channel.

UTILIZATION

The table is super simple to understand is how a table.
The knobs are large, so friendly enough tater, and their race is just the right length to be able to send a ct the other a "click". I personally think there is enough space between each but some are found too close ...

There is a knob of SETTING THE vertical cross curve 1 & 3 (why not 2?) And a reverse, it's pretty cool ... but not essential.
The vumtre is super prcis and many cal.
Buttons to select tracks or not to send the headphones are in the eqs each track.
The send level knobs effects on each track are also under the EQS, which is good too.

Rglage of the cross is a great rgalll ... Dj switch to select between short and sharp, a knob to fine tune, and a small button to place the dpart of the race. Prcis If we can have cross open and closed in one millimtre.
I really enjoy the fact that they are on the front of the table, but the button is not running dpart being protected at all, so it's pretty boring, a can of settle for nothing ...
on the other hand, not rely on the manual that explains how to turn A Z the table but that is limited a. Although the logic of things like "not plug your amp 3kils between the phono" are explained, but dmerde to replace your cross.

SOUNDS

I have not yet been tested on a good amp with good speakers, but dj with headphones the sound is clean (and thankfully), the eqs are very clear and spars. If you cut the Aiges we were able to Aiges AT ALL. the three eqs own. Regret: If we lower med hight and it was always a little bit of meds in the low, but that's nit-picking, nothing embarrassing, it's not a table of monitoring either ...
No breath (and then what else?).
The pan is also pretty clean, but still a gadget my taste.

EDIT: APRS almost a month of use, I can say that the sound is good. Trs good in the same mediums.
For the scratch was really a diffrence because the volume is slowed almost the same as in acclrs. So no need to touch the volume in mid-sentence.

OVERALL OPINION

It's only been a week that I have, so my opinions are still fresh, and no real walls, but I'm in love with the dj cross adjustable quarter of millimtre prs. I rgl opening half of millimtre dpart, and it really is pure mass murder ...
What I find con is the fact that the two vertical cross 1 & 3 are adjustable, not 3, so should not be forgotten in a mix, if for example changes the shape of the curve or direction, does not affect the way a 2 ...
Otherwise, as I said eqs are good, the sound is clean, there is a basskill on each channel, the more I see why, but clean.
The whole gives an impression of solidity the box is massive thread about the cross (those who have dj cass the nail in the palm of a screw know it's important).
I tried a lot of scratch mixers up the but not long enough not to have a real opinion, truth is my Premire true mixer, but I feel it will take me a long time. ..
Regarding the report qualitprix this day seems to me appropriate, try to think back to ask my opinion APRS 6 months-1 year of use ...

EDIT: One month, even happier.

No need for you dcrire, what you want to know is what I think.

UTILIZATION

Accustomed to an old Freevox 80's, the handling of this table "Punchy" is bizarre. (But of quality.

SOUNDS

Extra finish, velvet faders, knobs are all plastoc and do not reassure, (on Freevox is metal and it is screwed dessu / dessou, ca not move!) At this point, I wish more "solid", the Gmini Sounds a bit but I'm STRID. I do not use the crossfader but Sounds interresting. It is expected to use a cross spcial, sold with an optional feature of supplmentaire well chiade curve SETTING THE ... When we cut the three bands, there's been a sound, cash is: we are in the "very effective". Even if the need be.
You can also place internal jumpers to change the output level ...
In short the quality of the sound remains buena-buena, it's clean, powerful and precise.
The headphone level is good. Gains Azro tracks do not cut the sound completely.

OVERALL OPINION

But I saw a production that persists with the changeover function faders, (even after a first return SAV)
it looks like an over-amplification sudden phono tracks when I almost lost my monitors. continued ...