Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Tascam X-9 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Tascam X-9
Images
1/40
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
kinship kinship
Published on 03/23/05 at 17:49
The table is in rack 19 ", supplied with equres.
Table 4voix with a master.
Send return and externality.
Digital output (SPDIF), Master in RCA and XLR, RCA Booth. headphone.
ENTERED INTO CAR: 4line, 4phonos, 2digitales
Fully parametric EQ, the most complete that I've never seen a DJ table: 3 eq per voice, you can set the Q and frequency of 3 eq on each see without other!! In the menu we chose the voice and by Q-med hi-lo.
2 sampler of 8 seconds each
between footswitch to manage the effects auxpieds
The table contains a section of double effect and assignable to m voix1.3.Mic.Sampleur1 autre2.5.master.sampleur2
Effects: Reverb, delay, echo, flanger, auto-pan, pitch, Low Pass Filter, Transform.
effects of quality sync to BPM, customizable presets and'''
Kills every cot the crossfader.

C is the complete: only regret the upgrade MIDI silent originally planned seems more NEWS. Too bad.

UTILIZATION

The table is very easy to use but you have to delve a little nose in it to use all the possibilities. To mix and using few effects, no more complicated than DJM. Handling immediate.

The digital architecture provides many opportunities, set these preferences before his set that might otherwise get lost in menus Abscon without the manual. But given the damage EXTENDED possibilites we can not say anything.
EVERYTHING is adjustable through the menu system: the curve of volume faders, EQ on the headphone output to correct the color, the Q of eq, the appearance of diodes levels - for q ca moves more or less slowly ....
The simplest is to determine the prefernces once and for all ... especially for eq.

The effects are easily manageable set. Few parameters, using preset, good sound no big surprise. Very usable.

A little regret for the part sampler that is a bit difficult to use al use. It is not as practical as a red or other sound that hold the bpm. You have to edit the sample, determining the beginning and end of the loop, then it can be addressed by the tempo in the Sampler menu if the tempo has changed. It s not flawed but it takes time, too much during a mix. I use the least that I'll have believed. Remains interesting, one-shot mode or loop, reading in or out.

The manual is ok. Enough.

SOUNDS

With regard to the sound, sorry I have not pushed the last stronghold with these 100Kilos ....

To use my home studio and some accessories on a small sound system, ca me look pretty good. Nobody did that grill of digital c silent, it sounds very good. J got a Tascam XS4 - ecler manufacturing - and it seems to me that it sounded a little worse. Good output voltage, aps need to push the master in the red to hear something.

I often used in the input line and dig but the phono inputs are also great, good converters. Nothing to say, c is pro.

No breath (ca me change my first Behringer, lol).

Eq very good, no complaints. The scope of parametric EQ c is far from being a gadget - the other brands should follow.

OVERALL OPINION

I have the last 2 months, bought a 770, it declined further since. At that price, NO HESITATION.

I am not especially interested in the digital adjustable but given the possibilities that this offers the n is not negligible.

The pros: the effects, parametric EQ, sound quality - c is a pleasure to mix eq.
(Small) unless: the use of samplers somewhat laborious, lack of upgrade noon.

Quality price, given the huge recent declines, no hesitation. For a midrange price you have the high end. Tres seen over the possibilities of the DJM500, Smac Pro40 for a similar price.
S why I trade? Allen & Heath Xone 92, Freevox, Rodec 180. Consoles immediately much more expensive ...