View other reviews for this product:
DyoSynth « the largest of the family »
Published on 04/05/12 at 06:44I started with a zero, then 61 and then a 25.
This is because I have done a great job on the mapping that I made the collection.
I wanted to have on hand a controller that can, through a hub noon, my racks and control all my synths (which are sometimes stored in the ceiling!
Thus, I have never used the GUI machines
UTILIZATION
Touch is very correct, but the knobs are not great.
The best is the double row of LCD.
To order the hardware is better than version 2 (which loses a screen).
I spent my first zero very quickly, then I got another. My 25SL getting tired. The 61 is the one that uses the least, but I do not regret having it.
For programming, it is tedious. When I passed the 100 programs, I realized it was better to have several remote SL ...
OVERALL OPINION
It's like a software computer music, once you start a program or use the Automap, you can not live without it: you need a SL on hand at the risk of losing their investment. Therefore, it is addictive ...
This is because I have done a great job on the mapping that I made the collection.
I wanted to have on hand a controller that can, through a hub noon, my racks and control all my synths (which are sometimes stored in the ceiling!
Thus, I have never used the GUI machines
UTILIZATION
Touch is very correct, but the knobs are not great.
The best is the double row of LCD.
To order the hardware is better than version 2 (which loses a screen).
I spent my first zero very quickly, then I got another. My 25SL getting tired. The 61 is the one that uses the least, but I do not regret having it.
For programming, it is tedious. When I passed the 100 programs, I realized it was better to have several remote SL ...
OVERALL OPINION
It's like a software computer music, once you start a program or use the Automap, you can not live without it: you need a SL on hand at the risk of losing their investment. Therefore, it is addictive ...