We do not speak of snobbery when critical Berhinger sub prtesque their price. It is all the same to monitor speakers and as such it must respond constraints in terms of precision.
Of course as their prices are not that bad !! but you have to get things their way, and entrust them with a mix ...

SONORITS

Small correction on the linearity of these speakers:
I say that is never the answer according to the frquence was rotten, but these speakers ntaient not very neutral, especially flattering. Jai prcis same as for the price it ntait not so bad (compares FURTHER).

I find the comparison with NS10 and some dare Genelec:
1) If there are NS10 in most studio that nest surely not listen a whole. If we can afford more denceintes pairs, so take a good pair ds the departure, so not Berhinger (which are not so rotten that has either, but really just for the monitoring !!) Moreover, it is precisely the flaws of linearity (bump in the top mdium) that make NS10 are very reprsentes in studios (they are suitable work spcifique and not to the overall mix): I do not see a studio choose a pair of Berhinger for these defects in the low (too prsentes and too blurry).
2) Mrs. fight for Genelec which are also chosen for their bump in the medium: they allow a certain security in the mix, but hey, we love it or does not like (I naime not too much).
3) In-del linearity of the big difference with the Berhinger also remains the precision (and the comparison would even dare)
Warning, this is not the 1030 that lon found in studios (there Genelec Genelec and).

I repeats the Berhinger Nont not a bad quality for money. But are really just for monitoring. (And yet I havent afford me a pair of Genelec, Focal, Adam, Far.).

NOTICE GLOBAL

If you want more precision and hear pretty mdium plustt so go see the ct of HS80 from Yamaha, you will be surprised at the precision of mdiums. (Even if they cost a 200euros has more worth it to wait unu little).