All user reviews for the Neve 33115a

Features

Transistors
Flying high Circuit (notice prcdent completely missing its object: a large number of devices use the same components, but strong sound differently: for example, prampli of Yamaha DM and a AL.SO have the same transformer ', but use an omni result in both you will hear a difference, obligat').
A Racker
Very lgants my opinion.


USE

Use

Excellent for those who love deep. Others may not like: the mlomanie evolves with the tools that prvalent; Today, it is always Neve that leads into the heart of aficinados but SSL is not in command "decision makers" and then the question of neutrality that tends to put two oeillres Sevres on creativity.
Optimally, taken in stereo, especially guitars.
Its price has csqce make a less ergonomic home studio, default can buy a mixer, for example; it may make an install 'impractical, it depends config'. Between the processing power of a small-Hearing, or SSL, Neve and grain, I chose the 'Methodius' Neve (AMS-NEVE still make as large automated consoles today off portemme of a big studio today).
On hard, lack of automation can trade expensive: a genius Jean Daniel automated himself the Neve console, I would like to distingus "scratch" No Tears .dropoff window


SOUND QUALITY

Sound quality

Brand coloration, which depends RESPONSE sources: particulirement appropriate for FM pop-rock productions (eg, points of qua 'have been designed for Specifications patiently refined BBC).


NOTICE GLOBAL

Overall Opinion

Here begins the upscale Neve, which restores my best senses the signal in the harsh mix. For the '' real '' ing-sound, who like to work "the art of sonority.
Yes, essays but also bcp coutes.
The particular feature I like most: in-fluence (it retains virtually all)
The particular feature I like least: perhaps a draft stranded without high-quality corrections.

Features

Transistors
Flying high Circuit (notice prcdent completely missing its object: a large number of devices use the same components, but strong sound differently: for example, prampli of Yamaha DM and a AL.SO have the same transformer ', but use an omni result in both you will hear a difference, obligat').
A Racker, o note down
Very lgants my opinion.


USE

Use

Excellent for those who love deep. Others may not like: the mlomanie evolves with the tools that prvalent; Today, it is always Neve that leads into the heart of aficinados but SSL is not in command "decision makers" and then the question of neutrality that tends to put two oeillres Sevres on creativity.
Optimally, taken in stereo, especially guitars.
Its price has csqce make a less ergonomic home studio, default can buy a mixer, for example; it may make an install 'impractical, it depends config'. Between the processing power of a small-Hearing, or SSL, Neve and grain, I chose the 'Methodius' Neve (AMS-NEVE still make as large automated consoles today off portemme of a big studio today).
On hard, lack of automation can trade expensive: a genius Jean Daniel automated himself the Neve console, I would like to distingus "scratch" No Tears .dropoff window


SOUND QUALITY

Sound quality

Brand coloration, which depends RESPONSE sources: particulirement appropriate for FM pop-rock productions (eg, points of qua 'have been designed for Specifications patiently refined BBC).


NOTICE GLOBAL

Overall Opinion

Here begins the upscale Neve, which restores my best senses the signal in the harsh mix. For the '' real '' ing-sound, who like to work "the art of sonority.
Yes, essays but also bcp coutes.
The particular feature I like most: in-fluence (it retains virtually all)
The particular feature I like least: perhaps a draft stranded without high-quality corrections.