à Chaud
Note : 10 sur 10
Published on 12/01/08 at 07:07
Classic passive direct box, so without requiring a battery that wears out or phantom power.
I bought my first DIB-100 in 1995, and since I bought in as and for my needs. I currently have 4.
Four advantages:
1. Its transformer high quality: 5 Hz to 30 kHz in use on guitar or bass, and even 30 Hz to 20 kHz using the impedance increase.
Therefore: do not bored with the disadvantages of active DI boxes, you will not get better sound.
2. Use extra simple.
3. Ability to connect to an HP or guitar amp with 3 attenuations 0, -20 and -40 dB.
4. Strong and virtually impossible to destroy.
Usual possibilities: the second jack to go to one amp, switch to isolate the earth.
I also have 2 passive DI boxes purchased from Millennium Thomann, much less expensive but far behind in sound quality.
I also bought the dual active DI box Behringer DI-120 that ended in the trash because it unusable.
Conclusion: a very good direct box for a reasonable price.
UTILIZATION
N / A
SOUND QUALITY
N / A
OVERALL OPINION
N / A
I bought my first DIB-100 in 1995, and since I bought in as and for my needs. I currently have 4.
Four advantages:
1. Its transformer high quality: 5 Hz to 30 kHz in use on guitar or bass, and even 30 Hz to 20 kHz using the impedance increase.
Therefore: do not bored with the disadvantages of active DI boxes, you will not get better sound.
2. Use extra simple.
3. Ability to connect to an HP or guitar amp with 3 attenuations 0, -20 and -40 dB.
4. Strong and virtually impossible to destroy.
Usual possibilities: the second jack to go to one amp, switch to isolate the earth.
I also have 2 passive DI boxes purchased from Millennium Thomann, much less expensive but far behind in sound quality.
I also bought the dual active DI box Behringer DI-120 that ended in the trash because it unusable.
Conclusion: a very good direct box for a reasonable price.
UTILIZATION
N / A
SOUND QUALITY
N / A
OVERALL OPINION
N / A