View other reviews for this product:
absolu75
Published on 08/13/08 at 11:35
See below for compltes CHARACTERISTICS.
UTILIZATION
-Touch is enjoyable and trs trs close to that of a real piano, even if diffrent, can be a little harder, which is not bad when you pass on an acoustic piano for that matter. This is one of the best I numrique touch up the test in this price range.
-The configuration is very simple, the manual is comprehensive and clear trs and the number of buttons is rather limited for easier configuration.
SOUNDS
-First of all I prcise I bought the EP 880 as a piano and not a synthtiseur. So I speak here only of piano sounds, which seem pretty good, even trs good, even if it can certainly do better, but certainly not at the same price.
-I am still beginners at the piano, not cost nanmoins I wrong, and I find the sound trs correct, even if I would have the costs in an empty room, This is not the IDAL home.
OVERALL OPINION
I use the Roland EP 880 for over a year now.
J'apprcie much the srieux ism, the quality of touch and sound to a piano numrique. The mtronome Intgr is also very practical. There are many classic songs recorded on it, which is a dtail apprciable trs.
The weak point for me would be the only design that I find quite heavy and not very refined but not hideous.
When buying, I hsit length between the EP-880 from Roland and Yamaha P-140 I think.
In sound, it is true that Yamaha had a piano sound pretty impressive cock, but c'tait one of the few positive points that I raised in relation to Roland. The diffrence in price as trs important (the era was worth the Yamaha 1200 I believe and I pay the Roland 899), my choice turned to Roland. I also essay and Knorg Casio DIFFERENT, but select the final was between the Yamaha and Roland.
The report qualitprix is empty. It's perfect.
I also strongly recommend the purchase of this piano numrique, especially for beginners, and I do it again the same choice as I am happy with this instrument!
UTILIZATION
-Touch is enjoyable and trs trs close to that of a real piano, even if diffrent, can be a little harder, which is not bad when you pass on an acoustic piano for that matter. This is one of the best I numrique touch up the test in this price range.
-The configuration is very simple, the manual is comprehensive and clear trs and the number of buttons is rather limited for easier configuration.
SOUNDS
-First of all I prcise I bought the EP 880 as a piano and not a synthtiseur. So I speak here only of piano sounds, which seem pretty good, even trs good, even if it can certainly do better, but certainly not at the same price.
-I am still beginners at the piano, not cost nanmoins I wrong, and I find the sound trs correct, even if I would have the costs in an empty room, This is not the IDAL home.
OVERALL OPINION
I use the Roland EP 880 for over a year now.
J'apprcie much the srieux ism, the quality of touch and sound to a piano numrique. The mtronome Intgr is also very practical. There are many classic songs recorded on it, which is a dtail apprciable trs.
The weak point for me would be the only design that I find quite heavy and not very refined but not hideous.
When buying, I hsit length between the EP-880 from Roland and Yamaha P-140 I think.
In sound, it is true that Yamaha had a piano sound pretty impressive cock, but c'tait one of the few positive points that I raised in relation to Roland. The diffrence in price as trs important (the era was worth the Yamaha 1200 I believe and I pay the Roland 899), my choice turned to Roland. I also essay and Knorg Casio DIFFERENT, but select the final was between the Yamaha and Roland.
The report qualitprix is empty. It's perfect.
I also strongly recommend the purchase of this piano numrique, especially for beginners, and I do it again the same choice as I am happy with this instrument!