StolenSpirit
Note : 10 sur 10
Published on 09/13/03 at 11:10
CHARACTERISTICS Audiofanzine on, I note that just touches are more enjoyable, I test almost everything that exists in this CATEGORY synth and I had a K2500X before. The S90 is not envy.
UTILIZATION
Use easy enough for me, organiss menus into two levels only.
I find the manual parcontre not explicit enough on some points (you can not compare textbooks Roland)
SOUNDS
So it's really the advantage of this synth all is good and impressive.
I DSOL but Triton, Roland XV Exceeds. The sound of the same basic pattern seems to not sound better than the S90.
Even better, the piano is an absolute rgal. We must try it to believe it.
OVERALL OPINION
I tried two times in a store, compared with competitors before you buy.
Attention is rare because a synth is not clear policy of Yamaha. It may be as P80, stopped production when it is sought-trs.
I would definitely recommend those who seek the SON, not fonctionnalitspriphriques (sampling, squenceur, CONTRL amlior in real time. Now I have and I keep.
UTILIZATION
Use easy enough for me, organiss menus into two levels only.
I find the manual parcontre not explicit enough on some points (you can not compare textbooks Roland)
SOUNDS
So it's really the advantage of this synth all is good and impressive.
I DSOL but Triton, Roland XV Exceeds. The sound of the same basic pattern seems to not sound better than the S90.
Even better, the piano is an absolute rgal. We must try it to believe it.
OVERALL OPINION
I tried two times in a store, compared with competitors before you buy.
Attention is rare because a synth is not clear policy of Yamaha. It may be as P80, stopped production when it is sought-trs.
I would definitely recommend those who seek the SON, not fonctionnalitspriphriques (sampling, squenceur, CONTRL amlior in real time. Now I have and I keep.