View other reviews for this product:
Published on 02/01/08 at 18:51
.
UTILIZATION
.
SOUNDS
.
OVERALL OPINION
I just bought a SP1200 to United States. I made one with her now.
Warm: samples must pitch the dead. In 2.5 seconds it does not fit much. But even when not pitching too because if the tune is not enough to bring a normal speed. I personally go through an MPC before. Dja J'dites quick sounds and I scales "square" in the Sp
For the drums are not mistaken. I had 3 machines 12 beats. A MPC60, I dtest because ... the sound is too intrusive. too fat, too fat, too Submitted. has sounds too bloated I think. S950 for which a price is really interresting BCAN. I always have mine, and frankly I carrment gets off. And so a SP1200.
Frankly it's the rolls for drums. They are fat mga while remaining thin and prcis. I TACL of drums on old records in the Sp as they sound out of a database .... but for the better! Clean, dynamic, fat. MS me frankly sci.
APRS in terms of sampling and the famous tune we like it or not. If you want to sound exactly the same with grain on your disk .... forget (almost) The Sp dfonce the frquences tunant in and you have something that is super dirty cringe. But! a killing! You stuff without samples and they sound in the Sp + +!
APRS is the old school. Must love. Even if the use for an old bleuff me as a BCAN because the menus are clear, well organized and functions at all, still has the old stuff that Mr. Everybody throw the bucket. You must love to spend some more time and make the "cheap". You no samples in every way you drive a loop, a drum and sailing. Squence for MIDI in (keyboard) I do not know, I have not ssay.
The squenceur is cool but frankly I did find anything extraordinary groove if it is because these are the sounds of that groovy Sp. But once I squence the same beat in the Sp, once in my MPC uh .... the idolatry of squenceur SP excuse me but frankly I have not .... pfff Difference striking for such "rhooaaaa squenceur the MS it's too groooove mrr ..." brief. For comparison I find the MPC60 squenceur smoove much and I find that the yes, a particular groove.
I would say that we should not buy a Sp above a certain price (which I will not say to not get pissed off those who sell Reuche hyper '). I find it even when CHRE for what it is and frankly this is much BCAN the "legends" that raises its rating.
However, out of the question that I spare my own. )
For those who want the 12 beats but not the means I highly recommend the S950. It is a machine that makes beautiful things on the drums.
Finally I would say the least MS is not so much the 10sec sample of the fraction 4 * 2.5 and also the absence of a note off. It is CHRE I Tuva ('BPS me ...) but frankly it's really a pretty BCAN for lovers of vintage and beat 12.
Couple another sampler and a l. ... kill!
UTILIZATION
.
SOUNDS
.
OVERALL OPINION
I just bought a SP1200 to United States. I made one with her now.
Warm: samples must pitch the dead. In 2.5 seconds it does not fit much. But even when not pitching too because if the tune is not enough to bring a normal speed. I personally go through an MPC before. Dja J'dites quick sounds and I scales "square" in the Sp
For the drums are not mistaken. I had 3 machines 12 beats. A MPC60, I dtest because ... the sound is too intrusive. too fat, too fat, too Submitted. has sounds too bloated I think. S950 for which a price is really interresting BCAN. I always have mine, and frankly I carrment gets off. And so a SP1200.
Frankly it's the rolls for drums. They are fat mga while remaining thin and prcis. I TACL of drums on old records in the Sp as they sound out of a database .... but for the better! Clean, dynamic, fat. MS me frankly sci.
APRS in terms of sampling and the famous tune we like it or not. If you want to sound exactly the same with grain on your disk .... forget (almost) The Sp dfonce the frquences tunant in and you have something that is super dirty cringe. But! a killing! You stuff without samples and they sound in the Sp + +!
APRS is the old school. Must love. Even if the use for an old bleuff me as a BCAN because the menus are clear, well organized and functions at all, still has the old stuff that Mr. Everybody throw the bucket. You must love to spend some more time and make the "cheap". You no samples in every way you drive a loop, a drum and sailing. Squence for MIDI in (keyboard) I do not know, I have not ssay.
The squenceur is cool but frankly I did find anything extraordinary groove if it is because these are the sounds of that groovy Sp. But once I squence the same beat in the Sp, once in my MPC uh .... the idolatry of squenceur SP excuse me but frankly I have not .... pfff Difference striking for such "rhooaaaa squenceur the MS it's too groooove mrr ..." brief. For comparison I find the MPC60 squenceur smoove much and I find that the yes, a particular groove.
I would say that we should not buy a Sp above a certain price (which I will not say to not get pissed off those who sell Reuche hyper '). I find it even when CHRE for what it is and frankly this is much BCAN the "legends" that raises its rating.
However, out of the question that I spare my own. )
For those who want the 12 beats but not the means I highly recommend the S950. It is a machine that makes beautiful things on the drums.
Finally I would say the least MS is not so much the 10sec sample of the fraction 4 * 2.5 and also the absence of a note off. It is CHRE I Tuva ('BPS me ...) but frankly it's really a pretty BCAN for lovers of vintage and beat 12.
Couple another sampler and a l. ... kill!