View other reviews for this product:
BuBuOne
Published on 01/23/09 at 15:19
Value For Money :
Excellent
Finally an opinion on the pad
I use it for about a year. Previously I was playing on a TD-3 module with the CY-5. I will not give you the insult to compare the two, so I prefer to compare the rendering of a real charlest: this is expected to be in an amount of a VH-12 TD-20.
So in general: it is not bad at all! There is a sensor that detects the pressure between the two plates, and one course in typing.
The charlest is well managed, but I find that there is a flaw in shades of openness. Indeed, the move charlest lot when struck while it is semi-open, and this causes differences in the detection of the opening level. Therefore play regularly in open and semi-open is much harder than on a real charlest. Once we found the right position, it stays there, but as we had not found the sound is approximate.
To address this, I wanted to secure the plates more rigid, to be under the effect of oscillation. But if it is feasible for the top plate, the bottom one problem: it is mostly held by two plastic straps, which I do not find a rock-solid. I'm still looking how to improve rigidity, if anyone has any tips thank you to send them to me!
The price / quality ratio is hard to say. Roland is the best material to date, so if you want something that looks realistic, is for you. If however you are looking for efficiency and better quality / price ratio, I suggest you also consider the purchase of the VH-11, which seems to have less of a problem of oscillation.
I use it for about a year. Previously I was playing on a TD-3 module with the CY-5. I will not give you the insult to compare the two, so I prefer to compare the rendering of a real charlest: this is expected to be in an amount of a VH-12 TD-20.
So in general: it is not bad at all! There is a sensor that detects the pressure between the two plates, and one course in typing.
The charlest is well managed, but I find that there is a flaw in shades of openness. Indeed, the move charlest lot when struck while it is semi-open, and this causes differences in the detection of the opening level. Therefore play regularly in open and semi-open is much harder than on a real charlest. Once we found the right position, it stays there, but as we had not found the sound is approximate.
To address this, I wanted to secure the plates more rigid, to be under the effect of oscillation. But if it is feasible for the top plate, the bottom one problem: it is mostly held by two plastic straps, which I do not find a rock-solid. I'm still looking how to improve rigidity, if anyone has any tips thank you to send them to me!
The price / quality ratio is hard to say. Roland is the best material to date, so if you want something that looks realistic, is for you. If however you are looking for efficiency and better quality / price ratio, I suggest you also consider the purchase of the VH-11, which seems to have less of a problem of oscillation.