healeyblue
Published on 03/27/09 at 12:11
Bought in the 90 to replace an amplifier Revox dfaillant (yes, sometimes ...) this amp quieter and the Aesthetics srieuse t has backed a haphazard ancient JBL 4320 Studio Monitor enchres purchased with a recording studio.
This chance was given a wedding trsrussi dmontrant an effective and dynamic special but all curves, these standards JBL RESTORED nine prsence making a rare in all the frquences Dcibel distilled felt less by the LV 105.
Test with many other amplifiers on the same speakers, whose performance is rarely enough trs largely a fraction of the power of Luxmann, but none MRIT a similar appeal, making LV 105 that, although running every day, is still here and healthy almost twenty years later, still associated with its Fidler 4320, pregnant too rare today to be RECOMMENDED.
Fortunately this is not the case that the LV 105 t APRS quickly leaving an absolute REFERENCE its class, and today continues to shine in the sound quality which number of amplifiers even more contemporary high-end content themselves.
This chance was given a wedding trsrussi dmontrant an effective and dynamic special but all curves, these standards JBL RESTORED nine prsence making a rare in all the frquences Dcibel distilled felt less by the LV 105.
Test with many other amplifiers on the same speakers, whose performance is rarely enough trs largely a fraction of the power of Luxmann, but none MRIT a similar appeal, making LV 105 that, although running every day, is still here and healthy almost twenty years later, still associated with its Fidler 4320, pregnant too rare today to be RECOMMENDED.
Fortunately this is not the case that the LV 105 t APRS quickly leaving an absolute REFERENCE its class, and today continues to shine in the sound quality which number of amplifiers even more contemporary high-end content themselves.