Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Scott Sommerfeldt stereomaster 299d reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Scott Sommerfeldt stereomaster 299d
Images
1/1
Scott Sommerfeldt stereomaster 299d
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
gabsnack gabsnack
Published on 08/07/08 at 11:55
Here is the latest lamps produced by HH SCOTT SCOTT between 1964 and 1966, the one I get to possder in 1965, more than 40 years and still the DSIR to pay tribute to the musicians.

- How long have you use it?
Several months ago I came across an ad for this wonder 150 sold, not yet had the chance to cel connatre before the "tube", I start. RVision needed a little good, he arrived in its own juices and all the better as cel no bricolos dtruise miracle that more than anything else. But the chemicals that have condos that age are a bit limited, the power tubes do more powerful, and finally just replacing spices become dfaientes.

- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
Finally I treated a small APRS time running lights all the same, take advantage of this machine. Wow now I really know why there is a producer derrire an album, the sound is one that does DSIR really a hard one and everything changes for the first time I ' costs all of my records as new acquisitions.
Good for the shape I put some points ngatifs: the advantage of the transistor that I plug a play, right before the really enjoy the potential of the amp he must heater two hours, the the sound after twenty seconds, but a draft, after one minute you gain a little power, but the quality is not the cell can listen to France Info. This is the default amp has all major lamps clean, quality cel also learned to wait for good things.
Other "default" when it's good to forgive and not a bad source bin is a bad source and means.

- How do you report qualitprix?
Of course the ratio quality price is unbeatable, Tuva a "tube" current trs good quality less than 4000.

- With the exprience, you do again this choice?
You will not do again do not you?