Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Bose Acoustimass 5 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Bose Acoustimass 5
Images
1/41
Bose Acoustimass 5
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
centurygold centurygold
Published on 02/27/07 at 02:37
Value For Money : Poor
As I said later he s acts of good phnomne a fashion diametrically opposed to the high Fidler and it is technically impossible to obtain a sound quality due to the concept of mini-speakers in small plastic boxes poorly relayed by a small subwoofer quip too hps size of the ridiculous sound lifeless all in a small box in aglomr somewhat rigid vinyl covered all sold way too much! they can always get out versions of a ... a. .1000 and multiply the number of satellites of this type of material that will change absolutely nothing to the problems most haut.Il deficits is even more worrying that the housing of severe snoring and that there is a clear need to put in a corner to make it "work better". In Ralite in stereo it is essential to avoid the corners and everyone knows the problem of the speakers in the corners ... The concept of the subwoofer and satellites t invent a manufacturer 3A THERE OVER 20 YEARS and has not made the capital of that manufacturer. It was a quip of powered subwoofer and enslaved and worked perfectly. These speakers are no bad copy that one good rod but the marketing of the brand that it sells like hotcakes. The most mnageres fortunes (c is very expensive) is better off with the strong argument that the seller takes up less space and c is design ... and now everything is done as miniature dear MDME !
The in-store demonstrations are done with movies that "break a lot of cars"
and give as they say so. sound, the loudness constantly icing on the cake with a nice hole in the bottom mdium!
I vai WAF in the direction of making the market "was take up less space and as we do everything miniature and now you can buy dsign c Ms. c is new is necessarily better!" j bought Mr. seller you will know in fi ...
It seems that I RPET because c is the same language across both the public pro.