View other reviews for this product:
Published on 02/14/06 at 07:53
Value For Money :
Excellent
France
22 medium frets nickel silver United States Jim Dunlop, Seymour Duncan pickups (TB 4 (PAF) in bridge and an SH (Jeff Beck) in handle)
easel type tunomatic
2 volumes each of the microphone splitter corresponding a general tone, 3-position selector
Maple set neck in Canada
UTILIZATION
The handle is very nice, neither too large nor too late, and suits me perfectly, and after it is trying to get an idea.
Easy access to acute exteme seen cutting the cash
the guitar is a bit heavy and it takes a little time to adjust to be comfortable when playing sitting (no cutting back of the box). By standing up against, no problem.
3 position selector + microphones independently and split + 1 = general tone a multitude of sound combinations easily affordable.
SOUNDS
It suits me perfectly, especially as its wide range of sounds can tickle various styles. The splits are very effective in clean sounds, and complex sound palette goes by without the sound very clear to very heavy distortion, just playing on the set (and the stuff around can sometimes help too!). However, it is still closer than the Gibson Fender.
I use a digitech gnx2 and RC-20 directly into the speaker (amplifier peavey blazer recycled!) or a Vox AD30VT, and each time I am amazed by all the little sounds she sends Roxanne!
for sounds precisely, we can get clean sounds pretty slammin once the microphones splitter, as to distos, RAS, it sends and to sustain a class act in any situation!
all the sounds I like and I can never get bored and look for new things continuously
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 5 months only!
the look and sound are really terrible, and though I tried, I do not yet have negative
I tried some Fender and Gibson before, and being able to buy a French guitar (a little chauvinism!) with an excellent quality / price ratio has been in favor of Roxanne.
I do not regret my choice and would do it again without hesitation, and indeed, prospective buyers should include Roxanne Gibson Danxi their tests.
22 medium frets nickel silver United States Jim Dunlop, Seymour Duncan pickups (TB 4 (PAF) in bridge and an SH (Jeff Beck) in handle)
easel type tunomatic
2 volumes each of the microphone splitter corresponding a general tone, 3-position selector
Maple set neck in Canada
UTILIZATION
The handle is very nice, neither too large nor too late, and suits me perfectly, and after it is trying to get an idea.
Easy access to acute exteme seen cutting the cash
the guitar is a bit heavy and it takes a little time to adjust to be comfortable when playing sitting (no cutting back of the box). By standing up against, no problem.
3 position selector + microphones independently and split + 1 = general tone a multitude of sound combinations easily affordable.
SOUNDS
It suits me perfectly, especially as its wide range of sounds can tickle various styles. The splits are very effective in clean sounds, and complex sound palette goes by without the sound very clear to very heavy distortion, just playing on the set (and the stuff around can sometimes help too!). However, it is still closer than the Gibson Fender.
I use a digitech gnx2 and RC-20 directly into the speaker (amplifier peavey blazer recycled!) or a Vox AD30VT, and each time I am amazed by all the little sounds she sends Roxanne!
for sounds precisely, we can get clean sounds pretty slammin once the microphones splitter, as to distos, RAS, it sends and to sustain a class act in any situation!
all the sounds I like and I can never get bored and look for new things continuously
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 5 months only!
the look and sound are really terrible, and though I tried, I do not yet have negative
I tried some Fender and Gibson before, and being able to buy a French guitar (a little chauvinism!) with an excellent quality / price ratio has been in favor of Roxanne.
I do not regret my choice and would do it again without hesitation, and indeed, prospective buyers should include Roxanne Gibson Danxi their tests.