22hh22
Note : 10 sur 10
Published on 01/23/12 at 09:36
This small device, an aesthetic extremely modern for its time of occurrence, is a wonderful prémpli that I bought used in 1993. I use it every day. And I have met with no failures!
UTILIZATION
The Quad 33 is equipped with tone controls otognales very funny and well studied (although not in use most of the time!)
Operation is very simple.
SOUND QUALITY
On my installation, it is followed by a Quad 405.
What I think best characterizes the Quad 33 is his rectitude, honesty. The bass is firm. The stamps are just right.
OVERALL OPINION
I tried two preamps: a Sansui (an integrated amplifier at 555 A, part of which was pre-amp disconnect and use separately) and a preamp Elipson (very rare machine, with its rough and tiring (not for notes; sounds were cut with a knife) and of questionable reliability, the sound was so bad that it ended with bulky I close the parenthesis)
If there was one criticism to make on the Quad 33, this would be the use of DIN taken: it forces them to make connections to the RCA. A shame.
I would do the same choice.
UTILIZATION
The Quad 33 is equipped with tone controls otognales very funny and well studied (although not in use most of the time!)
Operation is very simple.
SOUND QUALITY
On my installation, it is followed by a Quad 405.
What I think best characterizes the Quad 33 is his rectitude, honesty. The bass is firm. The stamps are just right.
OVERALL OPINION
I tried two preamps: a Sansui (an integrated amplifier at 555 A, part of which was pre-amp disconnect and use separately) and a preamp Elipson (very rare machine, with its rough and tiring (not for notes; sounds were cut with a knife) and of questionable reliability, the sound was so bad that it ended with bulky I close the parenthesis)
If there was one criticism to make on the Quad 33, this would be the use of DIN taken: it forces them to make connections to the RCA. A shame.
I would do the same choice.