View other reviews for this product:
hexalto
Published on 12/18/07 at 14:50
Dj Retailer below.
9 / 10 more difficult to complete in a 75W combo of 50cm3 ...
UTILIZATION
Enough to satisfy the most demanding ct diversity. These simulations (roughly the sound of a POD + Celestion speaker) but an illusion. The simulation of Mesa Boogie Rectifier is buffa. There are plenty of presets (too?) But many of the same ring fawn. Besides the choice of amp and effects, SETTING THE qualisation plays for many in the definition and the original sound.
I have not opened the manual, the faade of the amp is self-explanatory for now ...
The LCD menu allows, in addition to presets, CHAC a tuner. Practice but not as sensitive and took a digital tuner (type Boss TU80)
SOUNDS
To play rock nag, the mtal, the heavy is pretty convincing. In clean sounds, it sounds less raliste, more artificial, but usable. With a guitar and violin making correct active pickups (EMG 81/60 in this case), it sends the wood. The 75W are l. on the other hand I have the impression that the del 2 / 3 of the volume, the sound loses frankly DEFINITIONS. To be confirmed.
OVERALL OPINION
Some days, it's little but I immediately filled by the t ct "plug and play" of the BTE.
Previously I tried the Vox VT 100 (not bad but the distos are "light"), the Marshall transistors (yuck) and amps lamps (Sovtek Mig 100, Rectifier, JCM2000 etc.). Of course, the Spider does not sound like an amp lamps, but the illusion (for the common man and especially the listeners) is well worth the investment (299).
For rpt, home and small rooms (but that play in stadiums?) Ct is more than enough power.
The arguments "presets raliss by major rock stars" are somewhat misleading. You will never sound the preset Mick Thompson Slipknot nor Andy Summers with Roxanne. Should not RVer.
Nanmoins Report qualitdiversitprix / power unbeatable for those who like me (and many of us) have not put in a 2500 + head Mesa cabinet + rack effects.
If I had to change to a lgrement suprieur budget, I allow myself to be tempted by the 120W or 150W version can be.
9 / 10 more difficult to complete in a 75W combo of 50cm3 ...
UTILIZATION
Enough to satisfy the most demanding ct diversity. These simulations (roughly the sound of a POD + Celestion speaker) but an illusion. The simulation of Mesa Boogie Rectifier is buffa. There are plenty of presets (too?) But many of the same ring fawn. Besides the choice of amp and effects, SETTING THE qualisation plays for many in the definition and the original sound.
I have not opened the manual, the faade of the amp is self-explanatory for now ...
The LCD menu allows, in addition to presets, CHAC a tuner. Practice but not as sensitive and took a digital tuner (type Boss TU80)
SOUNDS
To play rock nag, the mtal, the heavy is pretty convincing. In clean sounds, it sounds less raliste, more artificial, but usable. With a guitar and violin making correct active pickups (EMG 81/60 in this case), it sends the wood. The 75W are l. on the other hand I have the impression that the del 2 / 3 of the volume, the sound loses frankly DEFINITIONS. To be confirmed.
OVERALL OPINION
Some days, it's little but I immediately filled by the t ct "plug and play" of the BTE.
Previously I tried the Vox VT 100 (not bad but the distos are "light"), the Marshall transistors (yuck) and amps lamps (Sovtek Mig 100, Rectifier, JCM2000 etc.). Of course, the Spider does not sound like an amp lamps, but the illusion (for the common man and especially the listeners) is well worth the investment (299).
For rpt, home and small rooms (but that play in stadiums?) Ct is more than enough power.
The arguments "presets raliss by major rock stars" are somewhat misleading. You will never sound the preset Mick Thompson Slipknot nor Andy Summers with Roxanne. Should not RVer.
Nanmoins Report qualitdiversitprix / power unbeatable for those who like me (and many of us) have not put in a 2500 + head Mesa cabinet + rack effects.
If I had to change to a lgrement suprieur budget, I allow myself to be tempted by the 120W or 150W version can be.