minimumvital
Note : 4 sur 10
Published on 12/27/05 at 04:31
One of the first expander ddi hammond sounds
UTILIZATION
Using a nightmare! I no longer have this device, but I remember with horror the total lack of conviviality to program sounds. A real galre. Worse than Roland is telling you!
SOUNDS
Despite all the good that was said t the era (launch publiciataire? Cronyism?), The sounds of the expander are extremely dcevant. He has not the warmth of analog imitation (often even friendly without looking like the Hammond organ), but did not approach "raliste" found Now on other expanders or formulations.
OVERALL OPINION
He stood at the trs expensive era: more than 10 000 F in 1992! I'm having the pub. I was looking for a hammond sound module, and the only c'tait on the market.
UTILIZATION
Using a nightmare! I no longer have this device, but I remember with horror the total lack of conviviality to program sounds. A real galre. Worse than Roland is telling you!
SOUNDS
Despite all the good that was said t the era (launch publiciataire? Cronyism?), The sounds of the expander are extremely dcevant. He has not the warmth of analog imitation (often even friendly without looking like the Hammond organ), but did not approach "raliste" found Now on other expanders or formulations.
OVERALL OPINION
He stood at the trs expensive era: more than 10 000 F in 1992! I'm having the pub. I was looking for a hammond sound module, and the only c'tait on the market.