View other reviews for this product:
Published on 02/18/06 at 03:20
I liked her face with her big toy papads and nipples. Regressive and friendly.
The spec is very good, those of a modern sampler, with MIDI sync, correct memory, two votes of effects, dual filters, automated sampling, SMDI transfers ...
Compared to the asr 10, you win the resonance filters, unfortunately not independently adjustable for each filter and certainly not available for high passes, but you lose the import effects (such as FM synthesis) and especially TRANSWAVE Only legible. At first glance, it's completely absurd, as the TRANSWAVE was the stuff of Ensoniq them alone. Why?
UTILIZATION
Probably becaufe TRANSWAVE schedule is too complicated for the target of the asr x, ie children aged 5 to 9 years. Special design for toys 'n' rus. A moron is slight indeed able to turn the machine into a shoot. Everything has been planned for him. He has put together a good physical interface and a beautiful bones minimum with virtually no submenus or group of pages to make them work too much memory. For use ultimately confuse usability and simplicity, it is not very profitable.
The two knobs with which it does most of the TAF are completely rotten. After replacing them, they are just vague ...
The menus are long as your arm. They were trying to break a record. See the end, it takes time. Since it is impossible to move in the microscopic screen, there is only one parameter per page. For envellope, instead of having a page like this:
A: D XX: XX S: R XX: XX, we have a page with written out in full attack (gné!) and the value, to release another page etc. ... It leeeeeeeeennnnnnnnnnt.
Louder, edit the start point of a sound is impossible. I thought it was a default in my copy, but in the forums, I saw not.
You have a sound of 4000 samples, you want the start point to two thousand? From 2 to 5 minutes (optimistic forecast) to turn the knob to the con. I know it's unbelievable. Besides, I still believe it, because there are lots of opinions where people say it's great to split with x. I'll be happy to know that I missed something.
A priori, it is quite necessary to use the SMDI transfers for cutting. Will revert to the concept of autonomous workstation. Especially since the sequencer inspires pity.
Banks that stores sampled sounds are buried under the sounds of plants that smell bad.
It simply maps kits, multi, it's not too scheduled.
Asr tools x, x is editor for the buggy. I have not tried soundiver.
Using an mpc is easy, after learning to use it. By providing this step, the next step asr x. I do not go to the bottom of things with a lot of samplers, but enough to know that chio, sorry, ergonomics such is far beyond the tolerable.
Edit after a new test: I still exaggeration regarding the editing of start and end points. But it's still very laborious. The resampling itself is fast. The threshold for automatic pre-trigger, it's really good, it can happen when cutting resample.
I rediscovered some things, however distressing that had contributed to my general feeling, including automatic backups useless for any cumbersome and very destructive audio editing, timing mean noon with an external sequencer, or requests for confirmation ups.
For the rest, I will not repeat my opinion. Even a year later for a test without budgetary pressure (I have been ready), the asr x is the bat-sampler slowest I know. Very frustrating. If you count his music stand on it, chances are having to regularly control the desires of the rock through the window, as a writing afien.
SOUNDS
Asr 10 with a cleaner sound, better definition in the treble, less grain but who cares, especially the really big bass. Also key Ensoniq: presence of aggressive and violent dynamics. It is subjective, but for me, this box has the coolest sound I heard out of a sampler. I would put 10 to any other.
Edit: the effects are even better than on the asr 10, such as distortion, rather poor for my taste on the 10, very correct on x. Delays are great, they go into a spin when changing the parameters while running. In the mind is like a tape delay, and it is also musical. The modulations are very beautiful.
The filters are not shattering, but they are nicely browned.
OVERALL OPINION
Like everyone else, I heard a asr10, found information that made me even more appetite for x: resonant filters, memory and too bad for TRANSWAVE, I even know what it is. Like everyone else, I sold the x and took a 10. Like everyone else I'm happy.
Especially since I had some technical problems with the x, which probably influenced my decision, and that allows me to warn you of a fragile and temperamental machine. If you do not believe me, trains on the forums. The asr x / x pro collects bugs and breakdowns.
I think sometimes in resume, for the sound and features. Even if not everything you expect from a musical instrument.
The spec is very good, those of a modern sampler, with MIDI sync, correct memory, two votes of effects, dual filters, automated sampling, SMDI transfers ...
Compared to the asr 10, you win the resonance filters, unfortunately not independently adjustable for each filter and certainly not available for high passes, but you lose the import effects (such as FM synthesis) and especially TRANSWAVE Only legible. At first glance, it's completely absurd, as the TRANSWAVE was the stuff of Ensoniq them alone. Why?
UTILIZATION
Probably becaufe TRANSWAVE schedule is too complicated for the target of the asr x, ie children aged 5 to 9 years. Special design for toys 'n' rus. A moron is slight indeed able to turn the machine into a shoot. Everything has been planned for him. He has put together a good physical interface and a beautiful bones minimum with virtually no submenus or group of pages to make them work too much memory. For use ultimately confuse usability and simplicity, it is not very profitable.
The two knobs with which it does most of the TAF are completely rotten. After replacing them, they are just vague ...
The menus are long as your arm. They were trying to break a record. See the end, it takes time. Since it is impossible to move in the microscopic screen, there is only one parameter per page. For envellope, instead of having a page like this:
A: D XX: XX S: R XX: XX, we have a page with written out in full attack (gné!) and the value, to release another page etc. ... It leeeeeeeeennnnnnnnnnt.
Louder, edit the start point of a sound is impossible. I thought it was a default in my copy, but in the forums, I saw not.
You have a sound of 4000 samples, you want the start point to two thousand? From 2 to 5 minutes (optimistic forecast) to turn the knob to the con. I know it's unbelievable. Besides, I still believe it, because there are lots of opinions where people say it's great to split with x. I'll be happy to know that I missed something.
A priori, it is quite necessary to use the SMDI transfers for cutting. Will revert to the concept of autonomous workstation. Especially since the sequencer inspires pity.
Banks that stores sampled sounds are buried under the sounds of plants that smell bad.
It simply maps kits, multi, it's not too scheduled.
Asr tools x, x is editor for the buggy. I have not tried soundiver.
Using an mpc is easy, after learning to use it. By providing this step, the next step asr x. I do not go to the bottom of things with a lot of samplers, but enough to know that chio, sorry, ergonomics such is far beyond the tolerable.
Edit after a new test: I still exaggeration regarding the editing of start and end points. But it's still very laborious. The resampling itself is fast. The threshold for automatic pre-trigger, it's really good, it can happen when cutting resample.
I rediscovered some things, however distressing that had contributed to my general feeling, including automatic backups useless for any cumbersome and very destructive audio editing, timing mean noon with an external sequencer, or requests for confirmation ups.
For the rest, I will not repeat my opinion. Even a year later for a test without budgetary pressure (I have been ready), the asr x is the bat-sampler slowest I know. Very frustrating. If you count his music stand on it, chances are having to regularly control the desires of the rock through the window, as a writing afien.
SOUNDS
Asr 10 with a cleaner sound, better definition in the treble, less grain but who cares, especially the really big bass. Also key Ensoniq: presence of aggressive and violent dynamics. It is subjective, but for me, this box has the coolest sound I heard out of a sampler. I would put 10 to any other.
Edit: the effects are even better than on the asr 10, such as distortion, rather poor for my taste on the 10, very correct on x. Delays are great, they go into a spin when changing the parameters while running. In the mind is like a tape delay, and it is also musical. The modulations are very beautiful.
The filters are not shattering, but they are nicely browned.
OVERALL OPINION
Like everyone else, I heard a asr10, found information that made me even more appetite for x: resonant filters, memory and too bad for TRANSWAVE, I even know what it is. Like everyone else, I sold the x and took a 10. Like everyone else I'm happy.
Especially since I had some technical problems with the x, which probably influenced my decision, and that allows me to warn you of a fragile and temperamental machine. If you do not believe me, trains on the forums. The asr x / x pro collects bugs and breakdowns.
I think sometimes in resume, for the sound and features. Even if not everything you expect from a musical instrument.