djougachvili
Published on 01/12/06 at 00:01
Amp transistor type low-end
-> + knob volume gain (we almond What is the volume!)
+ bass + treble middle
headphone jack
a clean channel !!!???!!!( see below) and overdrive
nothing very miraculous
(3 j'met because it has a price on that I hope the 40th exceeded in.)
UTILIZATION
The key question is: do you want to make the nag?
because if you want to do something else, it will be hard because the sound is proportional to the gain you put !!!!!!!! I really can not understand how you dare to ca !!!!!!
by setting the gain to a minimum and the volume at max win for you a mini clean sound, after thee as the crunch or distortion (and if you do not want t'exploser ears with distortion you've got to rediminue sound -> very long and very boring)
SOUNDS
Dipstick test with a godin lg (so I was thinking not that bad its just the guitar)
The distortion is proportional to the price: a din draft -> 2 / 10
the "crunch" (if you can call it a crunch): see opinion on the disto -> 2 / 10
the clean sound does not exist -> -4/10 (j'me can put a negative note!)
good will we will put a
OVERALL OPINION
If it was a bit bigger it might make a good coffee table style contemporary art ...
But seriously how they can be stupid enough to put a proportion to his gain? I mean it cost very little (if anything) to leave a clean sound!
Luckily that I was just ready to unwinding ...
added after notice: Randall is after what I understand a brand rather more into contemporary hi-gain (yes ok redundant), (I precise that I was beginning a bit hard to believe that he made tube amps quality) the reason for this criticism have certainly pejorative rather that personal, I'm more into blues, rock, 70's, so I c not found on the sound I'm looking after, p'tet appropriate to hardos ... Now to the 115th (yes dipstick has seen that price!) in my opinion should not expect a miracle ...
-> + knob volume gain (we almond What is the volume!)
+ bass + treble middle
headphone jack
a clean channel !!!???!!!( see below) and overdrive
nothing very miraculous
(3 j'met because it has a price on that I hope the 40th exceeded in.)
UTILIZATION
The key question is: do you want to make the nag?
because if you want to do something else, it will be hard because the sound is proportional to the gain you put !!!!!!!! I really can not understand how you dare to ca !!!!!!
by setting the gain to a minimum and the volume at max win for you a mini clean sound, after thee as the crunch or distortion (and if you do not want t'exploser ears with distortion you've got to rediminue sound -> very long and very boring)
SOUNDS
Dipstick test with a godin lg (so I was thinking not that bad its just the guitar)
The distortion is proportional to the price: a din draft -> 2 / 10
the "crunch" (if you can call it a crunch): see opinion on the disto -> 2 / 10
the clean sound does not exist -> -4/10 (j'me can put a negative note!)
good will we will put a
OVERALL OPINION
If it was a bit bigger it might make a good coffee table style contemporary art ...
But seriously how they can be stupid enough to put a proportion to his gain? I mean it cost very little (if anything) to leave a clean sound!
Luckily that I was just ready to unwinding ...
added after notice: Randall is after what I understand a brand rather more into contemporary hi-gain (yes ok redundant), (I precise that I was beginning a bit hard to believe that he made tube amps quality) the reason for this criticism have certainly pejorative rather that personal, I'm more into blues, rock, 70's, so I c not found on the sound I'm looking after, p'tet appropriate to hardos ... Now to the 115th (yes dipstick has seen that price!) in my opinion should not expect a miracle ...