View other reviews for this product:
madcat
Published on 08/18/06 at 08:22
Made in Japan,
Bolt-on Maple 24 frets, rosewood fingerboard, and a nice binding around the neck and head in imitation ivory. The back key is shaped teeth of Piran, trs pretty.
The body is alder with a flame Saddle table for transparent colors, transparent black for mine.
This has really scratched the mouth
Config for the microphones, the MODEL 2006 is fitted with EMG 81 and 85, j'tais a bit skeptical at beginners, but it sounds.
Rglages standards, namely volume and Tone gnrale.
Floyd licensed jackson, for now he seems fine.
I put 9 because it is beautiful trs, trs finish is correct, but the origins rglages taient not tip top, so basically 8.5.
UTILIZATION
And the sleeve, bah I think many of those who will read me will also Louch of the ct ltd mh400, so I can tell you that this is the main difrence these two guitars. Jackson is quite the handle end is not an ibanez but far from a big gibson. It is fast and natural finisher at trs enjoyable, it slides on its own even if you sweat, unlike a painted stick (bark!).
As against it may be a bit more rounded at the bottom of the handle, but I chipotte.
Accs easy to high notes, except for Most recent internship frets on the strings, because of the hoof.
For usability, it's a superstrate bah, forum proves comfortable. Table bomb trs enjoyable, in a little quibble I to say that a muzzle on the way ibanez rg rear of the box comfort amliorerait standing, but would harm the aesthetics tick.
Balance correct, whatever it looks a little towards the head, but nothing to do with a kelly.
I forgot it was a scratch pluttlgre.
Sound
So this is what we INTERESTED MODEL compared to 2005: the sound!
In the saturated we obtain a full potato, trs prcis to play full of fast riffs while as well audible. Good sound as big on the big agreements, but scratch, due to its neck and pickups is intended more as a lead guitarist rhythm. Personal scared of cot cold emg 81, I am super happy, it sounds like I ultimately wanted. I tested the guitar
- At home, on my VS100, and the low volume should not be afraid to boost the bass and it sounds.
- In the BPS always VS100, one feels that the scraper is rveille, when you push the volume, the compression of the amp is most felt it was more bass, and normally you lose in precision but the fact that his job emg81 mr => excellent.
- Still with the BPS, but plugs into a VS100 cabinet mesa => Miami
- And finally a head engl powerball and cabinet mesa. ca sends the really good, but it is not my head I have not tampered with the rglages a little less than in the Previous config.
In his résumé for the saturated sends ca. Do not fear the lack of bass and warmth that low volume, it is when you go up the sound!
Amp lamp or hybrid best, however.
Its clear => the 81 is not too much for that, we pass on the 85, giving her a trs chalereu and a little round, personally I like it. Originally it silent enough prs strings and sounded louder than the 81, I rquilibrer moves away for all this and suddenly it sounds better, too round c'tait otherwise.
For those who want a little more than slamming the emg85 is not splittable, but coupled to 81 (position 2 of slecteur so) we would obtain almost the equivalent of a micro Splitt is returned to the shine.
I give 9 for sound, I am satisfied for now trs.
For those who squint on ltd, AIM had not the sound of this one, well that I have tried several times at some length. I found it more shrill, less deep (I know it is not logical when the ltd is mahogany, but hey ...)
SOUNDS
Obviously this guitar matches my style of music, his face we see immediately that it is made for mtal, and it's a jackson so hard to go wrong the above: D
Like I said I play on a Marshall VS100, soon I would have a baffle engl 4x12 "standard. I just pass my PERIOD effects, so I use it for now.
The sound the best that can be drawn from this are scratching sounds saturated rglages not too complicated, a lot of gain and digging in the legalization mdiums hop and sends ca.
If I really have to give a sound that I dtest I would say the micro-air bridge
9 still here
OVERALL OPINION
So this guitar is a 2006 MODEL forcment so I did not long ago: a good week. I think j'diterais notice when I had time to know the bte, but it's all good.
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
The best: the look in gnral, binding, transparent color, this guitar really throws.
The least: it costs them very little to jackson heel profiles for the junction body sleeve, and it would be a plus.
- How do you report qualitprix?
I pay 755 in thomman, I think it's the price. More CHRE store ok, but better then RULES.
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
After one week?! I think so, it's been a while that I wanted, even before it is mounted in emg active. I thought it put Duncan origin.
J'diterais if I change my mind, but I think it's a good guitar, better than my ex ibanez 7 string in the same price range, and especially more complete.
And another 9!
Bolt-on Maple 24 frets, rosewood fingerboard, and a nice binding around the neck and head in imitation ivory. The back key is shaped teeth of Piran, trs pretty.
The body is alder with a flame Saddle table for transparent colors, transparent black for mine.
This has really scratched the mouth
Config for the microphones, the MODEL 2006 is fitted with EMG 81 and 85, j'tais a bit skeptical at beginners, but it sounds.
Rglages standards, namely volume and Tone gnrale.
Floyd licensed jackson, for now he seems fine.
I put 9 because it is beautiful trs, trs finish is correct, but the origins rglages taient not tip top, so basically 8.5.
UTILIZATION
And the sleeve, bah I think many of those who will read me will also Louch of the ct ltd mh400, so I can tell you that this is the main difrence these two guitars. Jackson is quite the handle end is not an ibanez but far from a big gibson. It is fast and natural finisher at trs enjoyable, it slides on its own even if you sweat, unlike a painted stick (bark!).
As against it may be a bit more rounded at the bottom of the handle, but I chipotte.
Accs easy to high notes, except for Most recent internship frets on the strings, because of the hoof.
For usability, it's a superstrate bah, forum proves comfortable. Table bomb trs enjoyable, in a little quibble I to say that a muzzle on the way ibanez rg rear of the box comfort amliorerait standing, but would harm the aesthetics tick.
Balance correct, whatever it looks a little towards the head, but nothing to do with a kelly.
I forgot it was a scratch pluttlgre.
Sound
So this is what we INTERESTED MODEL compared to 2005: the sound!
In the saturated we obtain a full potato, trs prcis to play full of fast riffs while as well audible. Good sound as big on the big agreements, but scratch, due to its neck and pickups is intended more as a lead guitarist rhythm. Personal scared of cot cold emg 81, I am super happy, it sounds like I ultimately wanted. I tested the guitar
- At home, on my VS100, and the low volume should not be afraid to boost the bass and it sounds.
- In the BPS always VS100, one feels that the scraper is rveille, when you push the volume, the compression of the amp is most felt it was more bass, and normally you lose in precision but the fact that his job emg81 mr => excellent.
- Still with the BPS, but plugs into a VS100 cabinet mesa => Miami
- And finally a head engl powerball and cabinet mesa. ca sends the really good, but it is not my head I have not tampered with the rglages a little less than in the Previous config.
In his résumé for the saturated sends ca. Do not fear the lack of bass and warmth that low volume, it is when you go up the sound!
Amp lamp or hybrid best, however.
Its clear => the 81 is not too much for that, we pass on the 85, giving her a trs chalereu and a little round, personally I like it. Originally it silent enough prs strings and sounded louder than the 81, I rquilibrer moves away for all this and suddenly it sounds better, too round c'tait otherwise.
For those who want a little more than slamming the emg85 is not splittable, but coupled to 81 (position 2 of slecteur so) we would obtain almost the equivalent of a micro Splitt is returned to the shine.
I give 9 for sound, I am satisfied for now trs.
For those who squint on ltd, AIM had not the sound of this one, well that I have tried several times at some length. I found it more shrill, less deep (I know it is not logical when the ltd is mahogany, but hey ...)
SOUNDS
Obviously this guitar matches my style of music, his face we see immediately that it is made for mtal, and it's a jackson so hard to go wrong the above: D
Like I said I play on a Marshall VS100, soon I would have a baffle engl 4x12 "standard. I just pass my PERIOD effects, so I use it for now.
The sound the best that can be drawn from this are scratching sounds saturated rglages not too complicated, a lot of gain and digging in the legalization mdiums hop and sends ca.
If I really have to give a sound that I dtest I would say the micro-air bridge
9 still here
OVERALL OPINION
So this guitar is a 2006 MODEL forcment so I did not long ago: a good week. I think j'diterais notice when I had time to know the bte, but it's all good.
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
The best: the look in gnral, binding, transparent color, this guitar really throws.
The least: it costs them very little to jackson heel profiles for the junction body sleeve, and it would be a plus.
- How do you report qualitprix?
I pay 755 in thomman, I think it's the price. More CHRE store ok, but better then RULES.
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
After one week?! I think so, it's been a while that I wanted, even before it is mounted in emg active. I thought it put Duncan origin.
J'diterais if I change my mind, but I think it's a good guitar, better than my ex ibanez 7 string in the same price range, and especially more complete.
And another 9!