View other reviews for this product:
projectsoftx6
Published on 09/16/09 at 13:25
Hello all, I add my personal touch, you'll have plenty of information by reading the other reviews but I find it lacks the subtlety of the same all important.
Premire, you could not scratch the first beat, the cue point "slipped" shameful.
APRS update, this problem has disappeared, making room for the virtual disappearance of the BPM display. Super especially shameful that they have had nine months to fix the scratch the cue point. How long Submitted to fix this simple problem of BPM?!
The pitch is not linear!
When you are told that the pitch is 0.05% or 0.02% is a bit ironic! These values are correct for one direction of pitch, but in the opposite direction the change will be doubled. (0.02% in one direction and 0.04% in the other). So to reach certain values, you must move the pitch 2 times.
It is much more simple and reliable mixing on the Pio CDJ since 3500, the pieces are dcallent quickly, even if the correct value t mi. It sounds weird but I compared the 3500 CDJ 800, dernire on this, even if the value of the pitch is not good, it will stay longer with the 3500 call.
Fortunately, the new Update to correct this problem, but still not as reliable as the Pio.
The quick jump in a bad name, 2 seconds to resume playback APRS jump
Not to mention qques bugs bugs APELL random image (such as the break beat in one play and do nothing)
The board is slower than the Pio (at dtriment noise CD)
The CDJ is super fast search cue point, tracks, ... did not expect the same at all of 3500, even go your way.
To scratch, going for a 10 sec before and APRS point scratch impossible to scan the entire track to the plateau, its memory quickly saturates trs.
Denon is not enough the cost of the client, I am prs site, denondjforums.com
The 3500 is very well for the home and mix at home, it is not reliable enough for a club.
To mix the tempo, I recommend a plutt CDJ.
Could be better
Last updated:
Denon has released its latest firmwire. Submitted A Sampler slot is ais tempo and enjoyable. Since I switched over CD problem (no breaks beats). CDJ 800 Aprsravoir a test I prfre the Denon's 800 ... waiting to buy a CDJ MK3.
Last two days:
All told the DN-S 3500 are reliable, I never encountered bugs since the correction APRS firmware and especially the change in my burner (a Pioneer lol)
And no I still do not have CDJ Mk3 (too expensive for what it possde) and I will make a plutt upgrade to the DN-HS 5500.
Note rectification.
THE FIRST party will only benefit from its historic past.
I finally test the plate! Test specially for the tempo DJ mix
http://www.vincenhouse.free.fr ( http://vincenhouse.free.fr )
Premire, you could not scratch the first beat, the cue point "slipped" shameful.
APRS update, this problem has disappeared, making room for the virtual disappearance of the BPM display. Super especially shameful that they have had nine months to fix the scratch the cue point. How long Submitted to fix this simple problem of BPM?!
The pitch is not linear!
When you are told that the pitch is 0.05% or 0.02% is a bit ironic! These values are correct for one direction of pitch, but in the opposite direction the change will be doubled. (0.02% in one direction and 0.04% in the other). So to reach certain values, you must move the pitch 2 times.
It is much more simple and reliable mixing on the Pio CDJ since 3500, the pieces are dcallent quickly, even if the correct value t mi. It sounds weird but I compared the 3500 CDJ 800, dernire on this, even if the value of the pitch is not good, it will stay longer with the 3500 call.
Fortunately, the new Update to correct this problem, but still not as reliable as the Pio.
The quick jump in a bad name, 2 seconds to resume playback APRS jump
Not to mention qques bugs bugs APELL random image (such as the break beat in one play and do nothing)
The board is slower than the Pio (at dtriment noise CD)
The CDJ is super fast search cue point, tracks, ... did not expect the same at all of 3500, even go your way.
To scratch, going for a 10 sec before and APRS point scratch impossible to scan the entire track to the plateau, its memory quickly saturates trs.
Denon is not enough the cost of the client, I am prs site, denondjforums.com
The 3500 is very well for the home and mix at home, it is not reliable enough for a club.
To mix the tempo, I recommend a plutt CDJ.
Could be better
Last updated:
Denon has released its latest firmwire. Submitted A Sampler slot is ais tempo and enjoyable. Since I switched over CD problem (no breaks beats). CDJ 800 Aprsravoir a test I prfre the Denon's 800 ... waiting to buy a CDJ MK3.
Last two days:
All told the DN-S 3500 are reliable, I never encountered bugs since the correction APRS firmware and especially the change in my burner (a Pioneer lol)
And no I still do not have CDJ Mk3 (too expensive for what it possde) and I will make a plutt upgrade to the DN-HS 5500.
Note rectification.
THE FIRST party will only benefit from its historic past.
I finally test the plate! Test specially for the tempo DJ mix
http://www.vincenhouse.free.fr ( http://vincenhouse.free.fr )