View other reviews for this product:
Dj_Garfield
Published on 04/01/08 at 14:40
- Buy in January 2007, a pair Unitbr 490 />
In other words, it's been a year since I use them regularly, one to two hours a day, I Emene wherever I can mix, (outside / inside), and frankly NOTHING TO SAY, tjrs it works as well, not of problems with the system of front-loading Issue if I'm not mistaken technology used on the Car of the same mark as that is robust ...
The particularity that j'aprecie most, simply use all falls under the fingers, the effects simple but terribly effective not need 20 000 effects when it is known to use these little gems.
After testing Gemini / Numark / Denon, I "stayed in the CDJ200 parcequ'elle are simple no fuss or Blal the goal is not to mix and meter impress with 40,000 unnecessary buttons. The I only regret today is not to be able to test the CDJ400 with their USB ports, but as I do almost no MP3 mix because for the vast majority are CODS files in VBR (Various bit rate, sample rate variable), and the CDJ200 does not interpret them too well, in fact they can be read but impossibility to be a hot fix or broadcast so that's not to wedge evident (shark), so exit the MP3, I encodes wave for those who are at least a 320 Kbps otherwise should not expect a quality great, and others .. I have ben cleared and I pay the equivalent on Beatport (a 2 1 See the MP3 it's cheap to pay for quality).
In terms of quality and price, I do not think I have seen better elsewhere for the degree of sophistication of these Wonders, maybe the Denon would be the height if the Jog of the latter was less flexible ... is a matter of feeling ... As with the CD and it's not even bother to look for a scratch that has nothing to do with the vinyl then must not count on ... MP3 to scratch on there is only one material: RANE and Serato ... Here it says!
If I had to make another choice with the same given without hesitate I repaid a pair of CDJ200 ... If you have the opportunity to test careful you risk leaving them to cry ...
Maj. DJ Laurent -=] C [=- Stinger aka ....
In other words, it's been a year since I use them regularly, one to two hours a day, I Emene wherever I can mix, (outside / inside), and frankly NOTHING TO SAY, tjrs it works as well, not of problems with the system of front-loading Issue if I'm not mistaken technology used on the Car of the same mark as that is robust ...
The particularity that j'aprecie most, simply use all falls under the fingers, the effects simple but terribly effective not need 20 000 effects when it is known to use these little gems.
After testing Gemini / Numark / Denon, I "stayed in the CDJ200 parcequ'elle are simple no fuss or Blal the goal is not to mix and meter impress with 40,000 unnecessary buttons. The I only regret today is not to be able to test the CDJ400 with their USB ports, but as I do almost no MP3 mix because for the vast majority are CODS files in VBR (Various bit rate, sample rate variable), and the CDJ200 does not interpret them too well, in fact they can be read but impossibility to be a hot fix or broadcast so that's not to wedge evident (shark), so exit the MP3, I encodes wave for those who are at least a 320 Kbps otherwise should not expect a quality great, and others .. I have ben cleared and I pay the equivalent on Beatport (a 2 1 See the MP3 it's cheap to pay for quality).
In terms of quality and price, I do not think I have seen better elsewhere for the degree of sophistication of these Wonders, maybe the Denon would be the height if the Jog of the latter was less flexible ... is a matter of feeling ... As with the CD and it's not even bother to look for a scratch that has nothing to do with the vinyl then must not count on ... MP3 to scratch on there is only one material: RANE and Serato ... Here it says!
If I had to make another choice with the same given without hesitate I repaid a pair of CDJ200 ... If you have the opportunity to test careful you risk leaving them to cry ...
Maj. DJ Laurent -=] C [=- Stinger aka ....