Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Edirol UA-25EX reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Edirol UA-25EX
Images
1/85
Edirol UA-25EX

USB audio interface from Edirol belonging to the UA series

LeKing56 LeKing56
Published on 10/11/09 at 04:33
What technical specifications motivated your choice?
The possibility to connect condenser microphones with food phantme, USB connection.

For what purpose?
Recording voice and guitar, composed characters and for personal use.

What is your config (motherboard / CPU / Ram / Hard ,...)?
Packard Bell laptop mid-range (intel core duo 1.8GHz, 3GB of RAM)

In addition the interface possde 2 compressors, a limiter, the possibility to record up to 96khz, ports and MIDI IN OUT, Audio port, everything you need!

UTILIZATION

The drivers are stable trs (on Windows 7 and more!), Are not often put day but who cares. I use it with Sonar and I do not lag, unless I start fucking full of live effects monitoring (costs of live sound). I can read a lot of tracks at the same time. By playing against some, and even an audio file of any con, there are jumps. But fails all the time. When a registration occurs in the open, it's more fcheux! Fortunately, it's rare!

GETTING STARTED

Word, excellent documentation, and everything happens automatically!

OVERALL OPINION

How long have you use it?
I would say me now for several

What is the particular feature you like best and least?
An audio interface that works great. I love its simplicity of use, we do not take the head rglages miles. The sound is good, if somewhat dull. Unfortunately I was not able to compare with other products of the same range. I have long hsit with the FastTrack Pro but low on the advice, I DCID for it. I could not tell whether a worthwhile, but in any case I am Fully satisfied! Attention all the same: I like the least, it is the compressor Intgr. In other words, it is better not to use it at all, because they give her a mtallique on vocals and it's not pretty! Is better to settle for limiting and compressing the sound with a plug numrique later if the need arises.

Exprience with, you will do again this choice?
Hmm, let's say the price is expensive I find, but it's a hardware necessary for the recording! I would look can be seen if there is not the best quality for the price diffrence too leves. But dpenser 50 100 euros more, if the diffrence is really feel (and particulirement level of compression for example), why not! May be as many as between food phantme are not luxury (at least 2, for a sound recording Stereo with two condenser microphones). Sr what is, is that the quality is the appointment and I do not regret my purchase away!