Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Roland A-90 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Roland A-90
Images
1/134
Roland A-90

88-Key MIDI Keyboard from Roland belonging to the A series

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
alcools alcools
Published on 12/14/12 at 04:35
Someone asked an opinion more so here I am!

I've had this keyboard for many years ago. I then had a config that required a master keyboard managing multiple MIDI channels simultaneously.

I then had the EX version A90 (128 GPs sounds outdated nowadays, but an organ and piano remain usable memory).

Memory: 3 Midi Out, 2 MIDI IN, 8 Parties twelve o'clock simultaneously with controllable access to parts afternoon (channels) by dedicated buttons.

UTILIZATION

I think this is one of the best keyboards on the market masters, and it was for me the best imitation of piano touch. Programming is "you can not simple" or intuitive (well, it's still noon!)

I kept two months its 25 Kgs killing me back, and went to A70 who is 16 and has the same function (but semi weighted touch, but I play some piano, and I also stated that the A70 touch was bliss as its kind ...)

I subsequently had an Oberheim MC2000, which had the advantage of having a keyboard 88 keys heavy yet lightweight (17 lbs memory), a beautiful face, and functions primarily further twelve o'clock. The MC2000 is actually the best master keyboard that I have had, even if touching piano at the A90 crushes without problems. The MC2000 makes it possible to change everything in each piece while the A90 was a part of the parameters to be adjusted in the menu system (therefore fixed for all songs).

OVERALL OPINION

I never saw so long ago, but I have good memories to share her weight.

To summarize, if you are primarily a pianist, is the top for my taste.

If you play the synth, the A70 will be more portable, or MC2000 is more portable and more complete (and then, even without internal sounds, Oberheim written on the back, it throws on her white dress!)

I just note "very good" especially because of the heavy weight which clearly limits the transport (in addition, it is very long and does not fit in the rear seat width on many cars, and even limit the vertical seat passenger).