View other reviews for this product:
devine
Published on 08/01/07 at 02:55
Electro-acoustic amplifier 180 w. many effects. an anti feedbach. compressors etc.
for more info, to merchant sites rfrer
UTILIZATION
The use is very simple. The manual is not ncessaire
SOUNDS
I pass the electro-acoustics to amplify and improve my voice.
I sing and accompany children with my guitar for a fifteen years. I am therefore of the popular song Franaise and English.
A marshal's amiem'a prt as50r with whom I amused myself for a month APRS have amplified my classical guitar cuenca 45
I wish qq bought something a little more powerful (on paper) and I ordered online (with return if not satisfied) this amp behringer without trying.
When I turned it on I heard a hollow sound, accompanied by a mtallique rsonnance dsagrable. in 5 minutes I had tried all rglages effects and possible, without getting anything to correct.
I pushed my song and I dyed the BTE, the hyper.
A cot that, the marshall that I found nice no more, until you have tried the behringer, I feel really great now. In comparison, the sound is warm, full.
It gives relement want to sing.
I also found by testing that the 180 watts
the behringer is not more effective than the 50 watt marshall amp larsennent since both at the same level of power. Manufacturers talk about power as he would return. Power means nothing if the return is zero.
OVERALL OPINION
By the time the service comes back looking for the behringer (more than a week), he's running 2 hours maximum (and because I had made my friend's amp).
I cut all want to sing.
Since I bought an old Marshall AS 50 R for 165 euros. reverb and chorus being hs, I added a home picoverb alesis 75 euros (excellent) and a case behringer phantom power 23 euros (trs works well)
head with a micro-hc95 t-bone 49 euros (condenser microphone) and a small hand apx6 yamha 175 euros, it's nothing but happiness for about 500 euros. The report qualitprix is stunning.
To end the Berhinger, I would say that this instrument on paper seems INTERESTED trs. There are plenty of small Lumire that light. trs is beautiful. but all these and many frioritures effects only serve to look pretty. Basically, the sound is ugly and metal and 50 000 rglages not change anything. The compressor, anti feedback, it all seems also gadget ..
Voila, a test is INTERESTED when you have a point of comparison. So I cit the marshall found everywhere and very easy on occasion, but there are also Carlsbro trs that work well for not too expensive
I wanted to give this notice because I have been waiting for someone talks about the acx and this purchase has made me lose time.
If like me you live in the countryside, it's not always easy to go try a little hardware store REPRESENTATIVES.
I also left a little notice on the form of marshall.
for more info, to merchant sites rfrer
UTILIZATION
The use is very simple. The manual is not ncessaire
SOUNDS
I pass the electro-acoustics to amplify and improve my voice.
I sing and accompany children with my guitar for a fifteen years. I am therefore of the popular song Franaise and English.
A marshal's amiem'a prt as50r with whom I amused myself for a month APRS have amplified my classical guitar cuenca 45
I wish qq bought something a little more powerful (on paper) and I ordered online (with return if not satisfied) this amp behringer without trying.
When I turned it on I heard a hollow sound, accompanied by a mtallique rsonnance dsagrable. in 5 minutes I had tried all rglages effects and possible, without getting anything to correct.
I pushed my song and I dyed the BTE, the hyper.
A cot that, the marshall that I found nice no more, until you have tried the behringer, I feel really great now. In comparison, the sound is warm, full.
It gives relement want to sing.
I also found by testing that the 180 watts
the behringer is not more effective than the 50 watt marshall amp larsennent since both at the same level of power. Manufacturers talk about power as he would return. Power means nothing if the return is zero.
OVERALL OPINION
By the time the service comes back looking for the behringer (more than a week), he's running 2 hours maximum (and because I had made my friend's amp).
I cut all want to sing.
Since I bought an old Marshall AS 50 R for 165 euros. reverb and chorus being hs, I added a home picoverb alesis 75 euros (excellent) and a case behringer phantom power 23 euros (trs works well)
head with a micro-hc95 t-bone 49 euros (condenser microphone) and a small hand apx6 yamha 175 euros, it's nothing but happiness for about 500 euros. The report qualitprix is stunning.
To end the Berhinger, I would say that this instrument on paper seems INTERESTED trs. There are plenty of small Lumire that light. trs is beautiful. but all these and many frioritures effects only serve to look pretty. Basically, the sound is ugly and metal and 50 000 rglages not change anything. The compressor, anti feedback, it all seems also gadget ..
Voila, a test is INTERESTED when you have a point of comparison. So I cit the marshall found everywhere and very easy on occasion, but there are also Carlsbro trs that work well for not too expensive
I wanted to give this notice because I have been waiting for someone talks about the acx and this purchase has made me lose time.
If like me you live in the countryside, it's not always easy to go try a little hardware store REPRESENTATIVES.
I also left a little notice on the form of marshall.