Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Behringer Eurorack UB2442FX-Pro reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Behringer Eurorack UB2442FX-Pro
Images
1/78
Behringer Eurorack UB2442FX-Pro

Analog Mixer from Behringer belonging to the Eurorack series

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Chris Martins Chris Martins
Published on 04/06/05 at 13:02
Table Rack, 24 channels, 10 mic preamps with +48 V phantom power supply, bus 4, 8 direct outs ... a correct sections without effect. EQ on all channels, parametric medium. On paper There's everything you need.

UTILIZATION

The config is pretty simple overall. It does not differ from other tables and you have a little experience goes smoothly ca. The manual is fairly brief, but enough to attack if we start altogether.

SOUNDS

The preamps are quite transparent, not super subtle but they can work properly. We are not in Avalon, America is not to be mistaken, but it is not in the same price either. Frankly, a good compressor and insert the work is really effective and clean, to use the votes. A good condenser mic is also very important. The amp makes a big difference, however, and the voices and acoustic guitars I have a twin price of Q at Joe Meek. It is more pointed. But globalemnt can not complain, it's already very clean. As clean as the Mackie, but actually clear. The effects are really there to decorate, even if they are not really bad, but we are used to much better. Let's say it'll live for the good, the masi enregistrment prefer the effects of your soft or external rack.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a year. The price / quality ratio is simply enormous. I have a 1604VLZ it 6 or 7 years and believe me if you want, but the sound of the behringer is good. The price he has nothing to do with cons. For the price of lmackie you can have this table and an external stereo preamp plus a compressor 2 or 4 channel behringer always with an end result that will give much more successful and a pro table alone. Just for the ratio Q / P deserves a 10.