Kamuzik « Precision on the Prophet 600 »
Published on 02/15/14 at 06:35- Already described
5/10
UTILIZATION
- Already described
8/10
SOUNDS
Spend quality manufacturing, which was more cheap than the Prophet 5.
The Pro600 does not equal Pro5, there is a safe bet that the filters were not Curtiss. Nevertheless, the 600 delivers a big sound, maybe a little metal relative to Pro5.
The BIG default 600, which is rarely pointed, is the cruel lack of nervousness envelope filter and VCA. It is hard to believe that they were analog ... In my view, they were probably digital and .... coded on 8 bits! There, no attacks and decays as short slap on the Pro5 or MiniMoog but absolutely crippling weakness. Review!
Besides, I have kept a year.
Despite the quality of filters and polymodulation these catastrophic envelopes require me to note 2/10
OVERALL OPINION
I quickly resold.
I must say that I had at the time an Oberheim OB-Xa.
5/10
UTILIZATION
- Already described
8/10
SOUNDS
Spend quality manufacturing, which was more cheap than the Prophet 5.
The Pro600 does not equal Pro5, there is a safe bet that the filters were not Curtiss. Nevertheless, the 600 delivers a big sound, maybe a little metal relative to Pro5.
The BIG default 600, which is rarely pointed, is the cruel lack of nervousness envelope filter and VCA. It is hard to believe that they were analog ... In my view, they were probably digital and .... coded on 8 bits! There, no attacks and decays as short slap on the Pro5 or MiniMoog but absolutely crippling weakness. Review!
Besides, I have kept a year.
Despite the quality of filters and polymodulation these catastrophic envelopes require me to note 2/10
OVERALL OPINION
I quickly resold.
I must say that I had at the time an Oberheim OB-Xa.