View other reviews for this product:
tojar « Good machine but ... »
Published on 10/09/10 at 02:41I for ... MMHH ... 5 years
I tried other models, better but more expensive.
I loved the most, compared to the time it was the simplicity of use.
value for money does not mean much: it's now obsolete material and irreparable (or almost). I had been in OCCAZ, so the report was good for me (:
with experienc e for the same needs, I take the current version: the HD-P2.
Now you must know that all I saw DAP1 pass (y 'and had a package) all the mm problem: battery power on hand balls. The rest follows only way to use mains ... so it is more portable. it loses most of its interests. and for repair, there's qq years with mine, I tried .. after two years, I gave up, and I sold it as DAT salon to a friend qq roros.
I tried other models, better but more expensive.
I loved the most, compared to the time it was the simplicity of use.
value for money does not mean much: it's now obsolete material and irreparable (or almost). I had been in OCCAZ, so the report was good for me (:
with experienc e for the same needs, I take the current version: the HD-P2.
Now you must know that all I saw DAP1 pass (y 'and had a package) all the mm problem: battery power on hand balls. The rest follows only way to use mains ... so it is more portable. it loses most of its interests. and for repair, there's qq years with mine, I tried .. after two years, I gave up, and I sold it as DAT salon to a friend qq roros.