Sam75018
Note : 10 sur 10
Published on 12/04/04 at 16:28
Just an additional note of advice (most relevant) mentioned above:
preamp quality .... very average, same for the converter ... but hey the camera date and it is also somewhat related to the perfs of other devices when it was released.
I / O SPDIF poor: it difficult to synchronize with a super clean signal NUM (measured with a jitter <2 / 3 ppm (regular stalls ...). The output is a bit better, but "sticks" just in SPDIF specifications level: do not expect to make a few meters to the exit or risk losing the samples (mostly hidden by the receiver which interpolates between ...).
Attention, motor strip running (for rewind / forward rap) seems to get tired over time (seen on three copies ...).
Otherwise, it must be recognized that effective, compact, and it saves time!! It is also suitable for the report: So tough!
preamp quality .... very average, same for the converter ... but hey the camera date and it is also somewhat related to the perfs of other devices when it was released.
I / O SPDIF poor: it difficult to synchronize with a super clean signal NUM (measured with a jitter <2 / 3 ppm (regular stalls ...). The output is a bit better, but "sticks" just in SPDIF specifications level: do not expect to make a few meters to the exit or risk losing the samples (mostly hidden by the receiver which interpolates between ...).
Attention, motor strip running (for rewind / forward rap) seems to get tired over time (seen on three copies ...).
Otherwise, it must be recognized that effective, compact, and it saves time!! It is also suitable for the report: So tough!